Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

B-Girl, a Red Herring? Friday Palin Testified to Investigator

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 07:01 AM
Original message
B-Girl, a Red Herring? Friday Palin Testified to Investigator
ST. LOUIS (AP) — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin testified for two hours Friday in an abuse-of-power investigation that has been a distraction to her Republican vice presidential campaign. Palin's leadership was questioned this month in a stinging but largely toothless legislative report that found she violated state ethics laws by letting a family dispute influence her decision-making.

Palin is hoping the Alaska Personnel Board, which is running a parallel investigation, will clear her of wrongdoing. It's unclear, however, whether any conclusion will be reached before Election Day.

"I am so pleased to finally have gotten the chance to tell what really happened and get the truth out," Palin said in a statement released by her attorney. "It was the right thing to do to bring this before the Personnel Board and have a true arms length unbiased and apolitical investigator look into this."

The board is investigating the firing of her public safety commissioner, Walter Monegan. Monegan claims he was dismissed because he refused to fire Palin's former brother-in-law, a state trooper involved in a messy divorce from Palin's sister. The controversy, known as "Troopergate," took on national significance after John McCain selected Palin as his running mate.

The legislative inquiry found that Monegan's firing was proper but the pressure to fire the trooper, Mike Wooten, was not. Griffin says Palin stands by her decision to fire Monegan and her concerns about Wooten.

more at link: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jOTk11gvqDAgD0cY3i4WjI_2YOxwD94170SG1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vanderBeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wouldn't it be funny if her own personnel board found her guilty?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Essene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. They already expanded the investigation and hired a democrat to do it
As far as i can tell, she's REALLY pissed off the local Republican power brokers in Alaska.

The previous investigation was a republican-dominated Committee... the guy she fired was a beloved Republican. She insulted all of them when she turned on the investigation, brought in fancy DC lawyers, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Having a staffer commit a felony as a diversion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It worked?
:shrug:

Little conversation about the investigation was had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Rachel Maddow was pointing out last night why it is odd that Palin
refers to the scandal as Tasergate instead of Troopergate. Palin is on record as saying the firing had nothing to do with the behavior of the brother-in-law and more to other issues. So why call the scandal Tasergate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC