|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:53 AM Original message |
BREAKING-Supreme Court OVERTURNS RULING on OHIO DATABASE SHARING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
1. woooooooooohoooooooo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerrad (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
90. Guess Again Link> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. This is the Ohio State Supreme Court, I'm sure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. no, it's the SCOTUS nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeepBlueDem (433 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. the US Supreme Court ruled on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Cool!! I stand correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
67. Maybe they sense that impeachments could be on the table if they rule incorrectly!... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #67 |
87. Scalia should be impeached in any event. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. It didn't say the OH State SC. I'm not sure, but even if it is, and the Repubs. appeal, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrToast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. The next level beyond the Supreme Court? God?* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:59 AM Original message |
Even GOD agrees that the republicans are idiots.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cjsmom44 (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
18. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
63. And that speaks volumes about what God Thinks.. "GOP" = |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alter Ego (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #8 |
61. The newly-created ULTRA-MEGA SUPREME COURT 2000-X |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. Was it simply a temporary stay or a reversal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. NOT a temporary stay. They overturned the ruling. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Just saw the link - terrific news, saves maybe 200,000 new voters (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #4 |
56. It was a reversal of the Temporary Injunction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:55 AM Response to Original message |
5. ha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:57 AM Response to Reply #5 |
12. I bet Faux will be fuming all day today! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
11. Link! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. THANKS! I'll put it in my OP! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
14. i wish Andy were here to see this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
15. this is awesome news !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
16. Fantastic news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ebdarcy (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:59 AM Response to Original message |
17. Ha! Suck it Ohio republicans. K&R for Jennifer Brunner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Every Man A King (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
19. Vote in the poll at the link nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueclown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
21. Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:03 AM Response to Reply #21 |
23. I edited my OP with a link provided up-thread. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
22. Oh Thank Gawd!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. I think WE were concerned about this, too! Afterall, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #28 |
39. I know, I know, but Ohio has been getting the short end of the stick... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Oh... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:06 AM Response to Reply #22 |
29. Amen!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #22 |
31. JENNIFER BRUNNER ROCKS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #31 |
86. She rocks indeed. I hope her political future grows bigger and brighter than ever. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #22 |
37. Why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ebdarcy (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #22 |
41. I emailed her office to thank her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellacott (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Good idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alter Ego (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #22 |
64. I want to know how this got past a Republican Supreme Court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marsala (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
24. Kickass! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Godhumor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
25. LOL, so does the US Supreme Court have a majority of "Activist Judges" now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
26. The biggest factor in why this happened |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Yup. No more evil Repub. Ken Blackwell! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #26 |
44. So SCOTUS Justice Stevens acted alone in this decision? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. The decision was unsigned, but I doubt he acted alone. Usually these petitions are shared. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #46 |
51. You're right. This just in... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TornadoTN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 01:33 PM Response to Reply #51 |
77. "Justice John Paul Stevens took the appeal to the full court" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okieinpain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #26 |
73. good news, but does the total number of new voters have to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
80. I just read their site. Isn't the NPR news clip dated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #26 |
81. DUpe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
27. this is all I can get so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CitizenLeft (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
30. FANTASTIC FANTASTIC FANTASTIC!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
33. This is EXCELLENT News for Joe the Plumber |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #33 |
42. LOL, but it gives a well-known face to the reality that legitimate voters can be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kukesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
34. This Buckeye is very happy! Thanx, jenmito. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #34 |
38. My pleasure! This New Yawker is very happy, too! It's good news for ALL of us! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Essene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
35. any details on their decision? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yellowcanine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
36. I thought it was only Justice Stevens that was going to review it. Did he take it to the whole |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kukesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
62. See Post #49 -- the entire Court agreed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
40. Great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
47. anybody know if there was any dissent and if so was it the usual suspects? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
48. This is probably the difference in Obama winning OH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:20 AM Response to Original message |
49. THE PER CURIAM ORDER IS HERE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kukesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #49 |
59. Wonderful! Thanks, Steve. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
budkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
50. Great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
52. Damn Liberal activist judges! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindMatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
53. Let's get to first principles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nini (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
54. but but.. Rolling Stone said it was already stolen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
55. How does this affect the six other states reported as pursuing purges? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Depends on whether its being done by the state, or urged by a private party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HelenWheels (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
58. That should help shoot down the AG in Wisconsin's suit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
60. Heya, Jen.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:06 PM Response to Reply #60 |
65. Hey, Hepburn! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
66. OHHHHHHHHHMYFUCKINGLORD!!!!! This is huge! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Yes it is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EnviroBat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
69. YES YES YES YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quantass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 12:55 PM Response to Original message |
70. Wow. And phew!@ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. That's for sure! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
72. Evil does not rule the day!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhollyHeretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 01:22 PM Response to Original message |
74. Great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SunsetDreams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
75. K&freakinR YESSSSS!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
76. YES!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
78. What's the story behind why the records "don't match?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Misspelled names, wrong middle initial, address change, typos, etc. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
82. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
83. WOO HOOOH!!!! Yes. WOW! And, they won't be able to pull this shit in other states!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 03:24 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. It looks like they're TRYING in PA. I doubt it will work, though... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
85. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadowLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
88. Awesome, according to politico it was even a conservative legal arguement dems used to win the case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windoe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-17-08 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
89. Congratulations Ohioans!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC