I wrote two posts yesterday complaining that the infantilization of economic argument (abetted by both parties, though the pugs are worse) makes it impossible to properly counter John McCain's single most disastrous and disqualifying policy proposal: A government spending freeze and short-term goal of a balanced budget. (Which was Herbert Hoover's reaction to economic crisis.)
I said it would ne nice to see a presidential candidate willing to defend the basic, seemingly uncontroversial tenets of the Keynesian economic theory employed (to varying degrees) by all modern industrial democracies for the last several generations. (HINT: Family finances are a piss-poor analog for the world's largest economy. For starters, families don't control the money supply.)
Well, this morning Obama economic adviser Austan Goolsbee was on MSNBC and was asked the perennial talking-head question: How does Obama you plan to pay for all these stimulus proposals?
Goolbee replied:
If you pay for it it's not stimulativeThe startled talking head said, "So you're talking about deficit spending?" Goolsbee said, "Yes."
THANK YOU! Maybe not ideal politics, but very refreshing.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x7435289http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=7436598&mesg_id=7436598