Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A 2.2% McCain lead is greater than a 13.8% Obama Lead

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:17 PM
Original message
A 2.2% McCain lead is greater than a 13.8% Obama Lead
from Open Left:

The Washington Post maintains a webpage titled "Political Landscape 2008." This webpage has been updated recently enough to reflect Obama's 13.8% polling lead in Pennsylvania, a trend that uses polls released as recently as Wednesday. On this webpage, the Washington Post collects recent polling data, and then declares a state to either be a "battleground," or leaning toward one party or the other. Here are some of their polling averages and diagnoses:

Obama +13.8%: Battleground state (PA)
Obama +10.4%: Battleground state (NH)
Obama +10.0%: Battleground state (NJ)
Obama +9.5%: Battleground state (IA)
Obama +9.0%: Battleground state (OR)
Obama +8.2%: Battleground state (MN)
Obama +8.2%: Battleground state (MI)
Obama +8.8%: Battleground state (WI)
Obama +7.3%: Battleground state (NM)
McCain +6.8%: Leaning Republican (GA)
Obama +5.1%: Battleground state (VA)
Obama +4.0%: Battleground state (CO)
McCain +3.8%: Leaning Republican (IN)
Obama +3.5%: Battleground state (OH)
Obama +3.1%: Battleground state (FL)
Obama +3.0%: Battleground state (NV)
McCain +2.2%: Leaning Republican (WV)



Notice anything wrong with this list? Could it perhaps be that any state where McCain leads, no matter his margin, is defined as "Leaning Republican?" Could it be that states where Obama leads by 7.3%-13.8% are defined as "battleground states," while states where McCain leads by 2.2%-6.8% are defined as "leaning Republican." Does the uneven math in this strike anyone as problematic?

The Washington Post claims that a 2.2% lead for McCain is larger than a 13.8% lead for Obama. That is objectively wrong and quantifiably unfair. This is as blatantly imbalanced as election reporting can possibly get. For more on this, see my related post on the persistent inability for big media to admit that Obama is over 270 electoral votes, no matter what polling indicates.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UnrepentantUnitarian Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. WashPo needs to do something unusual...
...come up with some actual facts to prove their assertions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. kand r
I hope rachel or keith or someone will pick up on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have always noticed
Obama can lead by 10 points and he is slightly ahead according to the talking heads. Whereas if McCain is ahead in a poll by as little as 3 points it is a significant lead.

The Obama campaign and us have to beat two entities, the GOP and the M$M
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. We've always had the corporatemediawhores to
Edited on Sun Oct-12-08 07:26 PM by zidzi
fight (in my involvement, anyway)..only now we have the Internet to make them accountable.

We have to call them on it. After Obama wins it will be one constant stream of fighting them off the Obama Biden team leading America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yet the myth of the 'liberal media' lives on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. That's because the blowhatehards spew
it constantly. It is incumbent on us to change that with the facts and thanks for helping with that, FloridaDem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. WTF is that shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. and it is sooo blatant!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. I would guess a one-sided race doesn't sell a lot of papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Amazing
that there isn't even one state that's "leaning Democratic"! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. its unreal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
10. How can Michigan be a battleground state when the McCain campaign has pulled its resources?
Hell, the McCain campaign has all but conceded Michigan to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. funny - Obama has a larger lead in Pennsylvania than McCain does in Texas
think about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. yet Texas is "solid red" and Penn is "a tossup"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aaaaaa5a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. I have sat in my living room for the last 2 weeks...


and tried to figure out how PA was still a battleground state! I don't get it!


To top that, this weekend, the MSM even added IA as a battleground state. It's just more bias we are going to have to work through!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. A battleground - - Like Custer's Last Stand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fucking media.. Let them know we notice.
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Tue Sep-30-08 02:14 PM
Original message
Here's your "CONTACT THE MEDIA NOW" friendly Assistant! DO SOMETHING!
Whether it is the Push to skew towards McCain, plain ol' GOP bias, blatant sexism, ugly racism, or just totally incorrect reporting.....give media a piece of your mind!

Drop a tip on a good story to our "friends", holler at the biased ones, write a letter to the editor of newspapers!

Don't just get pissed; do something!



Phone Numbers:
CNN-
(404) 827 – 1500
Comment line: (404) 827 - 0234
(From grasswire
CNN NEWS CHIEF Eason Jordan. 404.827.5111. fax: 404.827.4215. [email protected]
CNN NEWS DIRECTOR Kim Bondy. 404 827 1500. fax. 404 827 1099
CNN NEWSROOM 404.827.1500 . 404.827.1500. [email protected]
Call Anderson Cooper at 1-866-NY-AC360


MSNBC
- Phone: 1-212-664-4444

CBS
-Phone: 212 975 3247

ABC-
ABC NEW YORK NEWSROOM: (212) 456-5100 [email protected] Newsroom Fax Machine 212.456.5150

Peter Salinger (THE MAN IN CHARGE OF ELECTION COVERAGE) Director, Special Events & Sports 212.456.5105 [email protected]

Cristi Landes, Manager, Programming 212.456.5107 [email protected]

Wayne Fisk Director, Programming 212.456.5327 [email protected]

Jeff Fitzgerald Executive Director, Operations 212.456.5554 [email protected]

Heidi Oringer Executive Director, Entertainment 212.456.5541 [email protected]

Jon Newman News Coverage 212.456.5100 [email protected]

Joyce Alcantara Assignment Manager 212.456.5106 [email protected]

Jim Kane Deputy D.C. Bureau Chief 212.222. 6604 [email protected]

Andrew Kalb Executive Director, Programming 05.567.2269 [email protected]

Robert Garcia Executive Director, News & Sports 212.456.5103 [email protected]



C-SPAN
Contacting C-SPAN's Washington Journal:
Republicans: (202) 737-0001
Democrats: (202) 737-0002
Independents: (202) 628-0205
Outside U.S.: (202) 628-0184
Email Questions or Comments: [email protected] This e-mail address is being protected from spam
bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it


ASSOCIATED PRESS OFFICES:
212-621-1500
http://www.ap.org/pages/contact/contact.html

*************************************


PERTINENT EMAIL ADDRESSES:
Jim Lehrer [email protected]
Tom BrokeJaw http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6872152 /
Chris Matthews [email protected]
Mark Halperin (no direct, but address him and use [email protected] )
Chuck Todd [email protected]
Everyone at CNN is listed individually on this page: http://www.cnn.com/feedback/cnntv /
Morning Joe - Feedback page-very bottom right column http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036789 /
Race to the White House - Feeback page- http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23598392 /
Andrea Mitchell [email protected]
Josh Marshall [email protected]
Andrew Sullivan [email protected]
Mark Ambinder [email protected]
Keith Olberman [email protected]
Rachel Maddow [email protected]
Eugene Robinson [email protected]
E.J. Dionne [email protected]
Donna Brazile [email protected]
Ed Schultz [email protected]
Randi Rhodes [email protected]
Stephanie Miller [email protected]
Thom Hartmann [email protected]
Mike Malloy [email protected]
Steve Clemons [email protected]
Bob Herbert [email protected]
Cynthia Tucker [email protected]
Joe Klein http://www.time.com/time/letters/email_letter.html
Howard Fineman [email protected]
David Remnick (the New Yorker) [email protected]
The New York Times Editors [email protected]
The Washington Post www.washingtonpost.com





JOURNALISM WATCHDOG AGENCIES TO CONTACT
FACTCHECK [email protected] - Drop them some facts; They need them
POLIFACT [email protected] - Drop them some Facts; they need them
American Journalism Review [email protected] -
Columbia journalism Review [email protected] - Drop them a Tip. They are looking for them
Committee of Concerned Journalists [email protected]
FAIR [email protected] - Drop them a tip - They are looking for them
Institute for Public Accuracy [email protected]
media matters [email protected] - Drop them a Tip. They are looking for them


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR TOOLS
http://www.democrats.org/page/speakout/letterstoeditors
http://www.congress.org/congressorg/dbq/media /



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
existentialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. Congressional Quarterly's ratings on these same states:
PA Obama favored
NH Leaning Obama
NJ Obama favored
IA Obama favored
OR Obama favored
MN Obama favored
WI Obama favored
CO Leaning Obama
IN Leaning McCain
OH Leaning Obama
FL No clear favorite
NV Leaning Obama
WV Leaning McCain

CQ also rated Missouri and North Carolina as No Clear Favorite, and if safe, favored, and leaning states electoral votes are counted then it credits Obama with states with 311 electoral votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
20. The biggest news here is that McCain is struggling to hold
hold the VERY red states (GA, WV, IN) while other moderately red states. Those "leaning Republican" states should be solid Republicans, and he should have large leads.

I think the reason some (VA, NV, CO, FL) of the battleground states are listed as "battleground" even though Obama is head by a larger margin is because they are not traditionally blue states -- they are either red states or go either way and Obama's lead isn't that big so they are being cautious about labeling them Democrat. However, there are several states labeled battleground where the margin is so large (PA, hello??) that it's ridiculous to call it a battleground especially when it votes Dem more often than Red. And Oregon??? Please. Ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. and even if he loses red states, the fact that they are close will run up Obama's popular vote total
and make it impossible for anyone to question the validity of his victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. A Black person in America has to be 3 times as good
for it to count. Didn't you know that? :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. Just the media doing whatever it can to skew things toward McCain.
And to provide some pro-active 'cover' for any Repug election fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllieB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Exactly! It's CYA for election fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. So is all the talk lately about the so-called 'Bradley effect'
If that was real, Obama never would have made it through the primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 06:35 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. I think we will see a reverse bradley effect
republicans who would never admit to their friends they would vote for Obama, but will fill in that oval when they are alone in the voting booth with their conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-13-08 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
27. Real Clear Politics (yes even them) took Va. off the "Swing state" category
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC