Breaking Freeper Thread: "Can You Say President Obama?"

[Tallison]

Looks like they're practicing getting their pieholes around that one:

:bounce: :toast: :party:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2100077/posts

[Xenotime]

1. YES!!

[OKNancy]

2. thank you for going over there and the report

[KingFlorez]

3. Suck on it, freepers

[Erin Elizabeth]

4. I won't click on the link, but sounds good to me!

[Patsy Stone]

5. I can and I do

frequently. Here's to saying it many, many more times.

:toast:

[redwitch]

6. I like the way you say that.

I like the way I say that! "President Obama". Nice.

[TexasLady]

FUCK YALL of COURSE President OBAMA

:party:

[NYC_SKP]

7. Quoth the Freeper: Game. Set. Match. President Obama.

Game. Set. Match. President Obama.

:kick:

[AllieB]

8. Which one of you wiseguys started that over there?

:P

[LiberalAndProud]

9. They're not happy with McCain's performance tonight?

sad

[Rosa Luxemburg]

11. no they are not happy

[Tallison]

15. It's like a wake over there

Half sad, half gnashing their teeth to shred McPain's mortgage rescue...

[DainBramaged]

10. Pieholes or assholes?

I think the Freepers are going to be learning a new position, a position of letting the adults finally run the show and not the children.

[TheDonkey]

12. LOL

[fishwax]

13. outstanding!

[NightWatcher]

14. did you read the meat of that post?

...to allow the Treasury Secretary to buy up actual troubled mortgages (Not MBS's or some other basket of securitized mortgage instruments) and then to change the loan (original principle) so that it is more in line with current (read: lower) home prices.

ARE---------------YOU---------------SERIOUS---------------MCCAIN?!


This is wrong on so many levels, but the six most troubling questions/concerns that pop in my mind are:


1) The U.S. Government will be buying what they admit will be inflated homes directly from stressed mortgage holders.


2) What effect will this have on the 92% of mortgage holders who are paying on time? - even while the value of their homes are falling off a cliff and they are becoming more upside down as each month passes.


3) In which markets will you buy these troubled mortgages?

4) Who will determine what the price of the home should be?

5) Who will eat the losses between what is owed on the current mortgage balance and the new and improved number arrived by Dictator Paulson and his successor?

6) If a contract is a legal agreement between at least two parties enforceable in a Court of Law - how will this precedent affect all other contracts?

Gee - McCain, do you think you might encourage a fairly large percentage of homeowners to default??


Moron.


_________________

you are right...but what do you expect from a frickin RINO?

Both aren’t answering the questions proposed to them and Tom BrokeJaw has no balls to shut either of them up.
_________________

This is what I meant when I was worried about McCain “ruining” Sarah Palin. She could be associated with crap like this.

_________________

This is what I meant when I was worried about McCain “ruining” Sarah Palin. She could be associated with crap like this.
If McCain loses, Sarah Palin needs to immediately come out with a book whereas she distances herself from McCain and lays out all of the disagreements she had with McCain but had to adopt as a Vice Pres.

And then we need her to run in 2012!
__________________

Well....Who have we got coming up in 2012?

[Tallison]

16. "Sarah Palin needs to distance herself from McCain..."

Day-um. That party's lost on some many levels.

[ismnotwasm]

17. Ruining Sarah Palin?

God, exactly what is intact on that idiot left to ruin?

Sounds like a movie "Ruining Sarah Palin"

[On the Road]

18. That Was Deepy Wierd

I didn't get a clear picture of what McCain was proposing. He was obviously trying to make a major new proposal, but I think it fell flat and cut against his whole philosophy.