Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We underestimate Sarah Palin at our immense peril

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:44 PM
Original message
We underestimate Sarah Palin at our immense peril
Sarah Palin was totally unknown in Alaska when she ran for Lt Gov in a primary and came in second. Still decently unknown she ran against an incumbent governor in a primary, beat him, then beat a former governor 48 to 40 in the general election. She did this with none of the things an unknown candidate usually has when he or she wins. She wasn't famous for anything. She wasn't related to a politician. She wasn't a multi millionaire. She was a two term mayor of a town of 6000 people. She then whipped not one, but two, governors. Add to this that the bar for her will be set so low that an anorexic ant wouldn't be able to crawl under it. Yes, she is wholly unfit to govern, but so was Bush. Yes, she is an intellectually incurious idiot, but so was Bush. Bush got in the White House, all she is shooting for is Blair House. We underestimate her at our peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elkston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama and Biden are not UNDERESTIMATING her. That's what counts.
And stop standing up for her ass. What she said at the convention was reprehensible.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Exactly!!!! Obama and Biden are treating her as a serious contender
Over and over and over again, they refuse to take the easy road, this in an of itself is building her expectations up.

And I agree that she will and should get torn to pieces ultimately because of her disgusting performance at the RNC.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obviously we're all doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
43. I'm not very worried about Palin either...
...but your knee-jerk reaction to interpret every comment you dislike in the slightest as if it must be coming from a freeper saboteur bent on the destruction of Obama and the entire Democratic party is tiring.

Having been utterly mystified how the American public could have watched Bush's debate performances and not thereafter giving either Gore or Kerry a theft-proof 15-20% margin of victory, I can't blame someone for still being worried that folksy and stupid can win. I'm not personally too worried, like I said, but I understand these concerns and don't feel the need to denigrate other DUers for having such worries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Then stop reading it....
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 04:14 PM by BlooInBloo
EDIT: Alternatively, tell them to stop making these idiotic threads. If you want a different answer, ask a different question, so they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. "These idiotic threads" meaning whichever...
...threads you deem idiotic, and you're requesting that I help aid in reinforcing your judgments of idiocy by telling others not to create the threads that offend you?

Yeah, right.

I have my own opinion of where the greater idiocy or offensiveness is located, and I will direct my own commentary accordingly.

If you want a different answer, ask a different question, so they say.

Is this your way of saying that you imagine the responses you post are absolutely essential responses that must be made, and whoever has invoked your wrath should have known better and changed their postings to have avoided your absolutely essential responses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. Great - then we're on the same page!
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 04:30 PM by BlooInBloo
"I have my own opinion of where the greater idiocy or offensiveness is located, and I will direct my own commentary accordingly."

I'm confused as to how we were at odds in the first place!

:rofl:


EDIT: Oh that's right. You don't want to accord the same privilege to *me*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silent3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. What's this about "according privileges"?
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 04:37 PM by Kerry4Kerry
I'm commenting on your posts. I can neither grant nor deny your ability to post. I happily acknowledge your every right to post stupid, mean-spirited, overly simplistic knee-jerk reactions to things that fellow members of DU post.

And I, exercising exactly the same degree of freedom, no more or less than yourself, will comment accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
63. DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bush was daddy's puppet installed after years of Bushco/CIA influence going back to the 60's
Palin is a flake who caught McHorny's wandering eye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
30. she is there becuase she is controlled also
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. I doubt she's a Carlyle puppet. nor James A Baker's tool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. someone must control her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
44. McHorny?
You think the old goat still gets it up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. thanks to the miracles of modern science and viagra
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. She IS NOT going to suck in the debate. The format is perfect for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. She is good in a debate when she knows what she is talking about.
I imagine she would be very good at something like the saddleback forum. She looked OK in the governor's debate, until Tina Fey started parodying her.

I think it all depends on the questions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. And Gwen Ifel's a pro
The questions are going to be hard. Hopefully the fact that she's African-American won't bias the perception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
35. Gwen Ifill...
...is straight forward, serious, no nonsense. Biden is very intelligent, knowledgeable and an excellent professional speaker who will also be very serious because that's the nature of a debate. Remember Thursday...it was dull as rain. So, Palin's cutesy style, mannerisms, gestures, general goofyness, may appear out of place. It won't be because she's a woman. Hillary never looked out of place at any debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #35
71. Check out the tough questions she asked during the last VP debate
dkf provided this link down thread:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/28/63953/6191

They're encouragingly tough and specific, difficult to fudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
40. Someone had a list of questions she asked the last time.
I wish I had it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #40
52. That would be good to see...
I'll try googling and post if I can find them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dontforgetpoland Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #52
64. Here some of them posted on DKOS this morning. Topic Foreign policy.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/9/28/63953/6191

Seems like pretty specific questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #64
70. It's the specificity that's gonna' trip her
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 06:17 PM by Tallison
There are ways around such questions, as seasoned politicians know, but forging them requires artful rhetorical skill and, more importantly, a comprehensive enough knowledge base from which to draw herrings. Without one or the other, much less both, fudging's going to be near impossible without looking deceitful and stupid.

I'm encouraged by the link you provided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
68. She is good in a debate when she knows what she is talking about.
She's a flake and an idiot! Why pretend she's a normal candidate like the press is doing.

She's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Things are different on the National Stage than Alaskan politics.
She has a helluva a hole to climb out of. In he previous races, she has not dug herself so deep, and been over her head before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Alaska is quite different from the United States
She hasn't proven a damn thing on the national stage so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. You are right. We can't afford to underestimate her, but
this time around, people know a lot more about her and how she operates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. You're right to a degree,
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 03:53 PM by Blue_In_AK
but so much more is known about her now than then. I myself said "underestimate her at your peril" when she was first nominated, but thanks to Alaska's bloggers the mask has come off.

She may benefit from diminished expectations, but I think her charm won't get her nearly as far as it did formerly here in Alaska.

Andrew Halcro's column in this morning's Anchorage Daily News is relevant. He ran against her as an Independent in the gubernatorial campaign in 2006.

Debates Prove Twinkle Trumps Facts
http://www.adn.com/opinion/comment/story/539459.html

<snip>

"Andrew, I watch you at these debates with no notes, no papers and yet when asked questions you spout off facts, figures and policies and I'm amazed. But then I look out into the audience and I ask myself, 'Does any of this really matter?' " Palin said.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Palin is the greatest debater since Cicero. Biden will fail to overcome her rhetorical brilliance.
There, are you happy now? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. pwned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
54. Heh
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Soon she will unleash her giant brain on the
unsuspecting public. I'm scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
47. Good One!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
56. I'm sure the OP is pleased with your Palin fear.
Yeah, I'm quaking in my boots, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
72. Wait 'til that rears its head in our airspace
Cover! :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. All she has is "folksy appeal," but fortunately Biden's got plenty himself.
I do agree that nobody can be overconfident about the veep debate (or anything else). The fact that Chimpy took two terms means ANYthing, however insane, can happen. The Obama camp has been smart not to denigrate her, nor to really talk much about her at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. We underestimated independents and they are showing support for Obama
I trust that Obama and Biden have got this covered. Seriously. They have advisors whom they pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. She could turn into Abe Lincoln, and Biden could get up & crap on the podium
& it wouldnt make any diff at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. You owe me a new keyboard, it's covered in water after reading your post! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
48. Don't have any liquid near your
keyboard when you're getting ready to read an A Swartzie post:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
61. 15 minutes in the dryer'll fix that right up.
Throw in some rose petals first to take away that keyboard stank. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
49. God, you guys are funny today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. I agree with the "Palin" and "immense peril" part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpi10d Donating Member (291 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. "don't underestimate sarah palin"
I saw several of these posts when she was first nominated, and gave them the benefit of the doubt.

At this time she has a track record on the national stage and it isn't good. She's taking shots from both liberal and conservative sources. She's appeared to be a fish out of water on several widely broadcast interviews.

I'd say her biggest upside would be to keep out of trouble and keep out of the limelight. My guess is she won't do that well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. The pukes are toast..
She is a fucking joke and everyone knows it.

I can't wait till Nov. 4th :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hey! We queers in the south think alike on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
22. Dsc, You get it. The wingnuts love her to death
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 03:55 PM by Fluffdaddy
A co-worker was not going to *vote for Mc-nuts because he hates him, but now he will because Palin is a hunting and gun nut like he is.................... Don't underestimate the Palin pick

*He was not going to vote for anyone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Yeah, but presumably voters like that are going to vote Palin no matter what she says up there
The debate isn't going to change people's minds who have already decided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
59. True. I think my co-worker knows in his heart that Palin is out of her league. But
*Code Speak* "She's like us" Goes right to the heart of "some" white people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #31
69. The debate isn't going to change people's minds who have already decided.
I disagree. There are many who have no idea what an imbecile she is.

Some will tune in to the debate and be in shock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beregond2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
23. It is impossible to underestimate her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. You beat me to it. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. The only people who will be impressed with her is us!
We are expecting her to sound like a babbling idiot. So even if she does just a little better than the Couric interview she'll sound like a genius and we'll be hyperventilating. My guess is that she will do a little better, but it will be clear (to the non-obsessed) that she is by no stretch of the imagination qualified to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
26. Too late.
Bubbles don't un-pop.

She'll never see favorables above 50 again unless it's the day after she bails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dumak Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. There are so many naive people on this debate issue
Palin will use an audioprompter via an earpiece, so will avoid coming off sounding like a confused idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. That wouldn't help at all..
Adding additional input would just make her more confused than she already is.

She's toast! :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dumak Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #39
55. It all depends on how well she can focus on the audioprompter
If you look at McCain's performance in the debate with this in mind, you will see that he could not be diverted/interrupted during his short speeches. He had a wild-eyed look, staring off into space. Actually, I am inclined to think his handlers told him to focus on some object and not look away so he wouldn't be distracted, and to just say what was being told him regardless of what anyone else says. With a little practice, it's really not that hard to follow audio cues. We'll see, I hope you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
29. I still think the person too many people underestimated is McCain
I remember so many times trying to warn everyone that we shouldn't underestimate him, but everyone seemed to think he'd be such a pushover in the debates. The man is as skilled a liar as anyone going, even as good a liar as Bush, and he gets away with it somehow.

Sarah Palin is simply a fucking joke, something out of a circus. She deserves no respect at all, but we just need to be careful not to screw up and do anything that appears bullyish or sexist. If Biden can just be himself without making any kind of a mistake that can be perceived as sexist, he'll handle her easily. Joe is one of the quickest thinkers on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
32. I hope it comes down to a couple of one liners from each of them,
cuz there is no way Ms. "As Putin rears his head" is going to win against "A noun, a verb & 9/11."

The media is pissed off that the McCain camp has sequestered Palin from them. I think they would go easier on her if McCain had let them have access to the air space between her ears, but now, they're pissed!

The only way we need to worry about Sarah Palin is if McCain wins the election. Let's focus on what's really important -- getting Obama elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
33. Don't over-estimate her either
Intellectual comparisons to Bush are fair, but so far she makes Bush look like Cicero next to her.
She hasn't been able to even complete a coherent answer in one-on-ones yet.
I welcome the debate - not for the obvious advantage of Biden (Biden will have to be careful, negating the inherent advantage) - but for putting Palin in a national forum without a script.
Look, she may be cagey enough for Alaska but this is different. Even in Alaska, her popularity has gone down as they listen to her on the national stump.
There's one thing that can't be hidden about her - she's not very bright and that will show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
34. Running in Alaska discussing Alaska issues is one thing...
Now she has put herself in national politics discussing national and international issues and she has gone from being a big fish in a small pond to the little fish in a big pond. I am offended that some have lowered the bar so low that if she simply shows up, they will say she won the debate. As a woman, I am offended that anyone would change the rules for her and not expect her to be judged on the same basis as a man. She is either ready for the job or she isn't. I say she's not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
37. "We"? Maybe the blogosphere. Don't presume to include Obama/Biden in that number
There never seems to be a shortage of people who seem to think that Barack Obama and Joe Biden and Obama's whole team don't know what they're up against. Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
38. Immense is too small a word. It's more like
Edited on Sun Sep-28-08 04:39 PM by A-Schwarzenegger
GARGANTULIAN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
torbird Donating Member (513 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
41. I own a TV and I can read.
Game, set, match against Palin. Sorry, but no whack-a-doodle warnings needed here, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
42. No, we should REMIND people that she genuinely believes the Earth is 6,000 yrs old.
We should REMIND people that she wants to outlaw the birth control pill and put women in jail who have abortions.

We should REMIND people that she thinks there were T Rexes on "Noah's Ark".

There's nothing to "underestimate". She's a fucking fundy goober, which is why the base of the GOP loves her. She is wildly out of step with most Americans. What we need to do is expose her for what she truly is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
51. I don't underestimate the stupidity of the public.
Palin's a zero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
58. It is not about underestimating Sarah Palin. It is about overestimating voters
Many are willing to vote based on gimmick. Remember that Bush, who is perceived as an idiot by most, had enough votes that enabled him to steal a couple of elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
62. If you consider the damage Palin has done to herself already,
she could come out of the debate looking like Margaret Thatcher and still have a long hill to climb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
65. Big difference between Alaska and the entire country.
"I'm going to have to get back to you". "In what respect, Charlie?" "Russia is next to Alaska". Sorry, not worried about underestimating her all that much. I think you're giving her way too much credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
66. It's the groups backing her
that we shouldn't underestimate. That's the real threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
67. Bog from Mudflats w/pix of Wasilla, and readers' comments. 90% favorable fell miserably after Troop
ergate.

http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/what-is-mccain-thinking-one-alaskans-perspective/

Another link about the witchdoctor-referencing preecher:

http://mudflats.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/palin-and-the-witch-hunter-chapter-ii/

One response:

I’m going to keep saying this until people listen. I am 72, same age as McCain, and I am a Republican so I feel I had a right to say it. The Social Security actuarial tables say that a 72 YO man has a 1 in 3 chance of dying in the next 8 years. That same 72 YO man has a 15% chance of dying in the next 4 years. If McCain wins there’s a chance you might be saying President Palin. Scary isn’t it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanderBeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
73. OH NOOOOOOOOOESSSSS!11!! !!eleven!!1 1!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC