Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The media is saying it's a tie.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:42 PM
Original message
The media is saying it's a tie.
I disagree. I think Obama came out ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flowomo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. felt tie-ish to me....
last words make a great difference.... Obama's finish was weaker than I would have liked. McCain really punched his way to the finish and Obama didn't respond very decisively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think Obama won, but McCain made him work harder for it
than I would have expected. So I'm not surprised the corporate media is saying McCain "won." We all know they have a double standard, and if a Repuke isn't totally incoherent, he/she "wins."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EarlG ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll take a tie
Personally I think Obama won but if they want to call it a tie that's fine. Obama is ahead, McCain needs to be winning these debates handily to regain lost ground. If the media calls it a tie, they acknowledge that Obama is on the same "level" as McCain. Immediately after the debate, David Gregory called it a "heavyweight fight". The implication to undecideds who don't know Obama is that he's a heavyweight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curtland1015 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If a "tie" means we're still up by 5% tomorrow, then I'm fine with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curtland1015 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. If a "tie" means we're still up by 5% tomorrow, then I'm fine with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildeyed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. Yeah, I liked that too.
Obama went toe to toe with the heavyweight and more than held his own. It makes it harder for those who want to say that Obama lacks substance to make their case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. I listened and didn't watch.....I'll just say I'd be happy if it was a tie
Its hard to debate when one participant just makes shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm with Earl, I'll take a tie on the foreign policy debate
Obama owned the part about the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texasleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. McCain needed a home run, he did not hit one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. I can live with a tie. Wish Obama could have KO'ed him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. I was disappointed by the debate because I thought Obama would have knocked him around silly
but, if one looks only at this debate, Obama wins solely on the issues.

I can't wait for the economy debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
11. I agree.
with the extremely lowered expectations for McCain, he really equipped himself well. McCain is a decent debater for being such a douche.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GhostofRichardRorty Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. The Voters won tonight
The rush to declare a winner or loser and to try to convert this into votes is premature and misses the boat on why debates are important. Historically, movement after a single debate is about 1%, that is all. It takes the whole series to have anything approaching a significant effect of 3 or 4%.

The debates are not about winning or losing, they are about low information seekers who have not yet made up their mind LEARNING about the candidates. The most important folks watching these debates have now gone to bed or turned on something fun, they aren't watching pundits. They are not DUers or Freepers, they are folks often too busy or otherwise disinterested in following politics except for big events like this one.

Think of it like folks who only go to church on Easter and Christmas: Many voters only really start to pay attention now. They learn about policy positions they have not paid attention to before, and they learn about the candidates' personalities.

So, relax a bit. Think about what the low information seeking voters learned about McCain: That he is really old, disrepectful, and rude. He was NOT likeable. Strike One. Further, they learned that Obama can also provide zingers but is also calm, rationale, and whip smart. Strike Two.

Most importantly they learned a LOT about where the two candidates stand on key issues, both their similarities (Russia/Georgia) and their differences (Iraq).

Have a little faith in your candidate and his policies, and just a little in the American voter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. It wasn't a tie. McCain came across as grumpy and redundant. Obama was way more likeable, had good
command of all the issues, and did a better job of actually answering the question that was asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. The point is that McCain didn't do what he needed to do.
We'll see how the voters respond to it, but I don't think it will affect the race very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's better than when they handed them ALL to Dubya
when * obviously could barely string a sentence together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
willbbalin Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Obama..
Obama had ALOT of ammo he could have used, but didnt go there.. its ok I think O did very well but when Obama hears those keywords he should jump on them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. People who watched it know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. To the average voter, it's a tie.
If I were still on the fence, I'd still be on the fence. We all know the lies McCain told tonight....they are not so intuned to them. Obama needs to hit it out of the park next debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. Who cares? A tie isn't good enough for McCain. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. Ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. Who cares? A tie isn't good enough for McCain. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. On Foreign Policy - Tie goes to OBAMA!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. A tie is better then a loss for Obama.
Especially given foreign policy was supposed to be McCain's strong point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. No real blows landed that'll stick.
Tie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Symarip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
25. Basically a tie is a win for us.
McCain needed a game changer. He needed to drop something on the table that was going to change the conversation and make him look more favorable. He didn't get any new traction on the straight talk depressed so a tie is a win for us. I'll take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
President Decider Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. You are correct. McCain was expected to win .... and didn't
This was supposed to be his strong suit (i.e., foreign affairs) .... that being said, he failed to make the case that he's any better ... or worse, than Obama on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. They'll only say Obama won
when the polling shows unequivocally that he's ahead. They're too chickenshit to commit themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. Tie ...
Edited on Fri Sep-26-08 10:18 PM by Raine
which is the best it's going to be unless the other guy falls flat on his face. I'll take it cause I think when a debate doesn't harm you it's all good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
29. Of course they're saying it's a tie. They're paid to say that.
Only question to ask -

which one was presidential?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. McCain needed a win.
Obama needed, however, not to look TOO much like he was playing for a tie. I think he deliberately held back a bit. We'll see how it plays; I think this might leave things where they are (which is ok.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
31. Keep in mind: on foreign policy: A TIE GOES TO OBAMA
No question. This was supposed to be McCain's strong suit. A tie is definitely a win for Obama.

Granted, McSame didn't explode, so I guess that's a big victory for him.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. That is what George Will said
The tie goes to Obama because the debate on foreign policy, which was perceived as his weakness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. I agree with that assessment
I personally thought that the disarray that has infected the McCain campaign would negatively influence his performance tonight, but that didn't happen. He came out and gave a performance commensurate with his level of experience. Obama came out and gave a performance commensurate with the level of his intellect. In that sense, I feel like it was a tie. Obama certainly did not obliterate McCain the way I would have liked. But, I can't complain too much, because McCain didn't win either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. Ditto!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
36. The media always wants a horse race. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC