Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama on the Emerging Federal Reserve - Treasury Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 10:55 AM
Original message
Barack Obama on the Emerging Federal Reserve - Treasury Plan
http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/samgrahamfelsen/gGgmmL

Barack Obama on the Emerging Federal Reserve - Treasury Plan
By Sam Graham-Felsen - Sep 19th, 2008 at 9:25 am


In response to emerging details of the Federal Reserve Treasury Plan to address the current financial crisis, Senator Obama released the following statement ...

The events of the last few days have made it clear that we must take further bold and decisive action to shore up confidence in our financial markets and avoid a deepening economic crisis that could jeopardize the life savings and well-being of millions of Americans. I support the effort of Secretary Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke to work in a bipartisan spirit with the Congressional leadership to find a systemic solution to our deepening crisis, and I will closely examine the specifics of their effort and the opportunities for swift action. As I review the emerging details of Fed-Treasury proposal with my top economic advisors this morning I will be guided by four basic principles:

First, we cannot lose sight that we are in the midst of a broad economic crisis that also requires immediate action to create jobs and help support distressed homeowners and communities. For too long, this Administration has been willing to hit the fast forward button in helping distressed Wall Street firms while pressing pause when it comes to saving jobs or keeping families in their homes. Swift and unprecedented action to shore up Wall Street must come alongside equally swift and serious efforts to help struggling families on Main Street, create new jobs, and grow our middle-class once more.

Second, any taxpayer-funded support must have as its focus protecting our nation's long-term interest in a stable financial market and a growing economy rather than rewarding particular companies or the imprudent decisions of borrowers or lenders. These extraordinary steps must be designed with only the public good in mind, not to enhance the personal gain of CEOs and management at taxpayers expense.

Third, this plan must be temporary and coupled with tough new oversight and regulations of our financial institutions. There must be a clear process to wind down this plan and restore private sector assets into private sector hands after restoring stability to the system. Taxpayers must share in any upside benefit that such stability brings.

Finally, this plan should be part of a globally coordinated effort with our partners in the G-20. We are facing a global financial crisis and the United States can take a leadership role in coordinating a global response to the present crisis, as well as greater regulatory cooperation and alignment to prevent future crises.

As we move beyond immediate actions to stabilize financial markets, it is important that we build upon the ideas I have laid out over the last several years about how to modernize our financial regulation. Eliminating consumer protections and lax oversight contributed to the crisis we are in today, and establishing commonsense rules of the road for our financial system can help restore confidence in our financial system.

Given the gravity of this situation, and based on conversations I have had with both Secretary Paulson and Chairman Bernanke, I have asked my economic team to refrain from presenting a more detailed blue-print of how an immediate plan might be structured until the Treasury and the Federal Reserve have had an opportunity to present their proposal. It is critical at this point that the markets and the public have confidence that their work will be unimpeded by partisan wrangling, and that leaders in both parties work in concert to solve the problem at hand.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can we please have this man as president
please!

I am so sick of the criminally inept running this country. Please cant we have a competant president for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ditto that! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. So, part of the gang shows up...did you WIKI the RTC yet?
Edited on Fri Sep-19-08 11:10 AM by Neshanic
I guess my "concern and trollism" on the topic that I posted on Obama giving a statement was well just stupid.

Oh, he did a great job...Perfect. Right time, and excellent news conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. NIIIIIICE!!
"For too long, this Administration has been willing to hit the fast forward button in helping distressed Wall Street firms while pressing pause when it comes to saving jobs or keeping families in their homes."

K & R:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wow. That's a surprising way to go.
Holding off on issuing a plan of their own so as not to undercut support for whatever the Treasury and the Fed come up with.

I wonder how that's going to play with the talking heads. I'm sure the right will try to spin this as a mushy non-response, a refusal to stick his neck out, but he actually is sticking his neck out by showing how he's more committed to the country's financial health than his own political success.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. When you look at this response compared to McCain earlier today
The difference is striking. Obama is clearly the one prepared to President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Obama nailed McCain on that. Very nice dig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick_of_Rethuggery Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Of the three of them
(Bush, McLame and Obama) Obama was the only one who took questions! Talk about leadership. He sounded sane, calm and take-chargey. McLame whined and blamed and was generally angry.

And also, stunning to see no lefty blogosphere has yet commented on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You just did.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sick_of_Rethuggery Donating Member (853 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. :-)
Touche!

HOWEVER, I meant people with frontpaging power!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Best Thing About This is That
1) Obama is taking the high road of bipartisanship, backing off from criticism and supporting the Treasury and the Fed.

2) He is probably getting even greater political benefits than if he had gone on the attack. He looks knowledgable and presidential, while McCain looks like a clueless panderer wandering all over the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
11. He makes so much sense...
No wonder McSame feels he has no choice but to steal Obama's words... even if he doesn't mean them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
12. Okay. I get it, now.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
13. He's too intelligent and decent for this nation of idiots
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yeah, he's better than we deserve - but I'll take him anyway! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamuu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. I sent this to a bunch of free-market fundamentalists n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveEconomist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
16. In Obama's '4 basic principles' may lie next week's Democratic critique of the Bush plan:
I really see FIVE principles, not 4 and IMO principle #4 may be the dealbreaker.

(1) "For too long, this Administration has been willing to hit the fast forward button in helping distressed Wall Street firms while pressing pause when it comes to saving jobs or keeping families in their homes. Swift and unprecedented action to shore up Wall Street must come alongside equally swift and serious efforts to help struggling families on Main Street, create new jobs, and grow our middle-class once more."

(2) "Extraordinary steps must be designed with only the public good in mind, not to enhance the personal gain of CEOs and management at taxpayers expense."

(3) The "plan must be temporary and coupled with tough new oversight and regulations of our financial institutions. There must be a clear process to wind down this plan and restore private sector assets into private sector hands after restoring stability to the system."

(4) "Taxpayers must share in any upside benefit that such stability brings."

(5) "Finally, this plan should be part of a globally coordinated effort with our partners in the G-20. We are facing a global financial crisis and the United States can take a leadership role in coordinating a global response to the present crisis, as well as greater regulatory cooperation and alignment to prevent future crises."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IMO if Republicans are willing to accept point #4, then logically they would have to cease opposing centrally-managed hard-asset Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds (Bill Clinton's original plan to save Social Security), giving up their insistence on individual private accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. McCains' response to economic bailout?
I'm gonna fire somebody - I'm just not sure who!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-19-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. I support Obama but . . .
I am not sure that this is going to work. (Keep in mind that for 25 years I have been a bacterium working away in the bowels of finance.) Generally, paper assets are not a good idea and this crisis is trying to communicate that fact to us. The various bailout plans are just so much masking of this core issue.

Economic security must ultimately rest upon converting labor to hard physical assets that produce and provide for basic human subsistence in ways that even a third grader can comprehend. (To some extent this suggests a de-urbanization of society; i.e., we work to produce the capital to acquire a self-subsisting plot of agricultural land.)

When they write the history of this era, I suggest the title, "The Myth of Finance."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC