Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin's Hannity interview could be worse for her than her Charlie interview

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:12 PM
Original message
Palin's Hannity interview could be worse for her than her Charlie interview
I've read some of the transcript and she's just pathetic. Hopeless.

Her guard was down with Hannity. That might not be such a good thing for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. is that tonight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you have a link cali?
Thanks! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. right here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Duh, I posted in that thread too
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 06:18 PM by livetohike
:blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Here....
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=14&entry_id=30409

Sane old shit for the most part, tons of outright lies and a lot of fluff.

Onto the excerpts:

On who is responsible for the failing financial institutions:

"I think the corruption on Wall Street. That's to blame. And that violation of the public trust. And that contract that should be inherent in corporations who are spending, investing other people's money, the abuse of that is what has got to stop.

"And it's a matter, too, of some of these CEOs and top management people, and shareholders too not holding that management accountable, being addicted to, we call it, OPM, O-P-M, "'other people's money.'"

"Spending that, investing that, not using the prudence that we expect of them. But here again, government has got to play an appropriate role in the stringent oversight, making sure that those abuses stop."

On fixing the economy:

"Through reform, absolutely. Look at the oversight that has been (lax), I believe, here at the 1930s type of regulatory regime overseeing some of these corporations. And we've got to get a more coordinated and a much more stringent oversight regime . . . government can play a very, very appropriate role in the oversight as people are trusting these companies with their life savings, with their investments, with their insurance policies, and construction bonds, and everything else."

"When we see the collapse that we're seeing today, you know that something is broken and John McCain has a great plan to get in there and fix it."
Palin and Hannity

Fox News Channel

Palin and Hannity

On the danger of a presidential candidate using the economy for political gain:

"Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to get into the issue that we're talking about today. . .It is that profound and that important an issue that we work together on this, and not just let one party try to kind of grab it all or capture it all and pretend like they have all the answers. It's going to take everybody working together on this."

On the government's bailout of AIG:

"I do not like the idea though of taxpayers being used to bailout these corporations. Today it was AIG, important call there, though, because of the construction bonds and the insurance carrier duties of AIG."

"But first and foremost, taxpayers cannot be looked to as the bailout, as the solution to the problems on Wall Street."

On reaction to Obama's attack on McCain for saying that the "fundamentals" of the economy are strong:

"Well, it was an unfair attack on the verbiage that Senator McCain chose to use because the fundamentals, as he was having to explain afterwards, he means our workforce, he means the ingenuity of the American people. And of course, that is strong and that is the foundation of our economy."

"Certainly it is a mess though, the economy is a mess. And there have been abuses on Wall Street and that adversely effects Main Street."

"It is, somebody was saying this morning, a toxic waste there on Wall Street, affecting Main Street. And we've got to cure this."

On how she and McCain can follow through on their promises in a divided Washington:

"Yes it is gridlock and that's ridiculous. That's why we don't have an energy policy, that's why there hasn't been the reform of the abuse of the earmark process. And real reform is tough, and you do ruffle feathers along the way. But John McCain has that streak of independence in him that I think is very, very important in America today in our leadership. I have that within me also. And that's why John McCain tapped me to be a team of mavericks, of independents coming in there without the allegiances to that cronyism, to that good ole' boy system. I'm certainly a Washington outsider and I'm proud of that because I think that that is what we need also."

On drilling and ANWR:

"But, no secret, John McCain and I agree to disagree on that one. And I'm going to keep working on him with ANWR."

"Well, I'm very, very encouraged, as we all understand that John McCain knows, more so than any other leader in our nation today, that for national security reasons we must be an energy independent nation. We must start taking the steps to get there. That's why he has embraced offshore drilling. That's why he has embraced the ideal of the alternative fuels also. And I'll keep working on him with ANWR."

"It's a nice thing about him, too, is he is not asking me or anybody else to check our opinions at the door. He wants that healthy deliberation and debate with it."

"On her family's reaction to being picked as John McCain's running mate:"
"It was a time of asking the girls to vote on it, anyway. And they voted unanimously, yes. Didn't bother asking my son because, you know, he's going to be off doing his thing anyway, so he wouldn't be so impacted by, at least, the campaign period here. So ask the girls what they thought and they're like, absolutely. Let's do this, mom."

On if the political attacks by the Democrats on the Republicans will be effective:

"You can't underestimate the wisdom of the people of America. They're seeing through the rhetoric, and they're seeing through a lot of the political cheap shots, also. And they're getting down to the facts and the voting records that are going to show that stark contrast."

On if Republicans in Washington have lost their way in recent years:

"I believe that Republicans in Washington have got to understand that the people of America are not fully satisfied with all the -- all the dealings within the party. The same -- it applies for the other party, also. Americans are just getting sick and tired of politics as usual, that embracing of the status quo, going with the flow and just assuming that the people of America are not noticing that we have opportunities for good change. We have opportunity for a healthier, safer, more prosperous and energy-independent nation at this time. People are getting tired of a process that's not allowing that process -- that progress to be ushered in."

On if she's spoken to McCain about her role in a McCain administration:

"Sure have. I'm very excited about the role that I will play as his partner. And I will focus on energy independence and reform overall of Washington and tax cuts for Americans and reigning in spending."

On how she thinks Americans will be impacted if the energy dependency isn't solved:

"In that $700 billion transfer of wealth, that's when the price of oil was up as high as it was there at the $140 mark. But, of course, that transfer of wealth, still, that imbalance of trade is something that we need to tackle also. Yes, those dollars should be circulating within our own economy. It's a matter of national security. It is a matter of our future prosperity. Energy is inherently linked to security and prosperity."

"We sort of have a 'do nothing Senate' right now where nobody's wanting to really pick up the ball and run with it and take the steps that we have to take to become more energy independent. And it's going to take…a change in leadership in order to really crush that gridlock and get going on this."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thanks RollWithIt
:hi: I can't wait for the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDoorbellRang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Is there such a thing as a Freudian typo?
"And I will focus on energy independence and reform overall of Washington and tax cuts for Americans and reigning in spending."

Seems to me the Repukes have been reigning in spending for some time now. :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. She'd better be scared about the debate,
Seriously...if she's pathetic with the likes of a I'm sure fawning and gushing Sean Hannity, then she's got some serious problems with Joe Biden and real questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Biden is going to lose the debate.
The media will just say that he looked sexist and arrogant while answering all the questions compared to Palin's stuttering incoherence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Biden needs to be careful about looking like he's beating her up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SuperTrouper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. No, Gwen Ifill will make sure that Palin gets grilled
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'd love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
curious one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Was transcript edited version or raw?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. I agree if you look at Freeperville they seem underwhelmed by it
Not sure why as I haven't seen it but they're literally defending her by saying "you can't be 100% truthful in the sense that you can't say 'you look fat and ugly.'" So it seems there is something she said that they are excusing as a "white lie?"

Or something....at any rate, hardly the ecstatic response they had to her convention speech, which I couldn't understand for the life of me anyhow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. I thought it might go poorly for her
Obama actually had more trouble with Olbermann than O'Reilly, because Keith was trying to push him into places which he didn't want to go. Hannity OTOH just let Palin talk freely, and it left her looking... empty. Bland. Generic. Most of those statements could come from a Democrat, which the Freepers must dislike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Vapid and vacuous was the best description I've heard yet
I remember hearing an English professor put the smackdown on a student for misusing this word, which he said meant "excessive wordiness"...


At first I thought Palin chose the wrong word to describe McCain's ramblings... but at second look, no, spot on! :rofl:



verbiage
One entry found.

Main Entry: ver·biage

Pronunciation: \ˈvər-bē-ij also -bij\

Function: noun

Etymology: French, from Middle French verbier to chatter, alteration of Old French verboier, verbloier, from Old French (Picard dialect) werbler to trill — more at warble

Date: circa 1721

1 : a profusion of words usually of little or obscure content <such a tangled maze of evasive verbiage as a typical party platform — Marcia Davenport>



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Exactly.
Hannity had a goal, an agenda. But there is a reason he is on Fox, rather than in the real world. When I heard she was going to do the interview with him, I thought it was one of the worst moves their side could possibly make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Didn't say "USA Americans" but otherwise sounds a lot like Miss South Carolina. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. And if she does poorly, the McCain minions can't trash Hannity as they did with Charlie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC