Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Freep Veep Anxiety: "Romney couldn’t even win the nomination despote outspending everybody"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 11:40 PM
Original message
Freep Veep Anxiety: "Romney couldn’t even win the nomination despote outspending everybody"
Cherry-picked gems from their "Obama picks Biden" thread (867 responses)...



To: PAR

Romney couldn’t even win the nomination despote outspending everybody and had higher negatives polling than any Dem or Rep candidate. Plus you’d have two old rich white guys on the ticket. Romney shoulsn’t even be an option. McCain should pick Cantor or Chris Cox.

865 posted on Saturday, August 23, 2008 8:51:50 PM by Texas Federalist (McCain/Cantor '08)

***

To: PAR

It doens’t matter as much to me that Romney has changed positions.

may not to you but the democrats are just salivating for ads contrasting romney as VP and romney during the primary and romney as governor and romney running for Senate.

860 posted on Saturday, August 23, 2008 7:54:23 PM by ari-freedom (Obamuh uh uh uh uh uh uh ummmmmm)

***

To: WOSG

Could be....or RG...we haven't fielded a winning 100% since RR, our recent track record is not good.
A nice change would be to choose someone who is accomplished, ruthless, has made hard choices governing, with concrete produced results.

How could it hurt to try at this point?

853 posted on Saturday, August 23, 2008 3:19:30 PM by roses of sharon ((Who sent Barack Hussein Obama?))

***

To: roses of sharon

“I so wish McCain would pick someone WITH SOME ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS!Is it too much to ask for a man WHO HAS ACTUALLY PRODUCED?”

The obvious pick is Romney. A real maverick, a real bipartisan reformer with a real executive and a real never-in-DC outsider who’s actually done some amazing things in the private sector (Venture Capital and Olympics). Comparing Obama running a few ACORN senators and Romney turning about the Olympics shows how big the stature gap is.

851 posted on Saturday, August 23, 2008 2:59:39 PM by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - NObama, stop the Hype and Chains candidate)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. despote???
That's a new one.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "Despote", past tense of "despite"...
in Freeperville.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Is Write Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Just that close to "despot."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-23-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. "WSOG" the freeper sounds like a real piece of work...
.
.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. The sad thing here is circa 2002, Romney was actually a good Republican.
Edited on Sun Aug-24-08 12:29 AM by Drunken Irishman
Someone well respected and he even hinted about the possibility of running for governor here in Utah in 2004 as a Democrat, because he was "liberal" by Utah standards. The Romney clan has a history of progressive Republicanism and when he ran against Kennedy for senate, he actually ran left of Ted on a few issues. Also remember, he endorses and accepted the endorsement of liberal Salt Lake mayor Rocky Anderson.

But he sold his soul to win the Republican nomination, knowing they would never embrace a social liberal.

THAT speaks more volumes than anything Romney has ever said or did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sorry, I'm coming to believe that there is no such thing anymore as a good Republican.
At least not the professional ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Obviously not.
As Romney stood for nothing and "good" in the sense he seemed to at least embrace the Rockefeller aspect of the Republican Party.

But it was either all for show or he stands for nothing...maybe both. Which means he never was good, just a good showman.

He duped a lot of people, though, especially those men and women who voted for him. No way would 2007 Romney win the governorship of Massachusetts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heaven or hell Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Mass Hacks and their friends and families

with so much entrenched corruption on Beacon Hill that goes back for years it is no wonder Mitt could not get anything done -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. And he was a horrific MA governor
Nice of him to leave us with his crap mandatory healthcare legislation that the state can't begin to pay for. Fuck Mittens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. He's a fake.
And generally fake politicians fail as leaders because, well, they don't know how to lead. Look at Bush, he ran as a moderate and it was all a fucking lie, a phony image set to gobble up the center and he failed as a leader. If you're a phony, you stand for nothing and if you don't stand for anything, how the hell can people expect you to lead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heaven or hell Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-24-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. the South does not like him - did not vote for him in the primary
and might not go for him again



Condi Rice might have a better chance at wining those southern votes - for real
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC