Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain: ‘I Have Not Missed Any Crucial Vote’ On Energy Legislation»

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 07:06 PM
Original message
McCain: ‘I Have Not Missed Any Crucial Vote’ On Energy Legislation»
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/15/mccain-energy-aspen/

<snip>

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) currently holds the title of most absent U.S. senator, missing over 60 percent of votes this session. In an interview with Walter Isaacson at the Aspen Institute yesterday, McCain claimed he has not “missed any crucial vote” on energy legislation:

McCAIN: I have a long record of that support of alternate energy. … I’ve always been for all of those and I have not missed any crucial vote. But my citizens in Arizona know that when I’m running for the President of the United States I have to be out campaigning.

McCain’s has actually missed several “crucial” energy votes. In July alone, he missed every single energy vote brought to the floor. This session, McCain has skipped votes supporting renewable energy tax credits four times, all of which were filibustered. In June, for example, McCain missed a vote on the landmark Lieberman-Warner climate change legislation.

McCain has also been the “crucial” absent vote on key legislation. In December, legislation stripping tax break giveaways to Big Oil and investing in cleaner sources failed by one vote, 59-40 (Vote #425); McCain missed that vote to campaign. In February, McCain skipped a vote on extending tax credits to renewables, which also failed by one vote (Vote #8). Both times, McCain was the only senator absent.

---

I just can't get enough of McCain's campaign. Keep 'em coming, Grampa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well he not only missed some
but he also voted poorly on the rest.

If you are going to vote poorly, might as well stay home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RayOfHope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe he doesn't think any vote is crucial n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. McBULLSHIT is at it again.....say anything for a vote....if he was that good, he would be a shoo in
Because he is not being shoo'ed in...that means he is not all that good.

We don need no stinking NOT ALL THAT GOOD Prezinents

We tried it once...don work...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow. And the brazen lies just keep coming.
But will the media (outside Keith O and Jack Cafferty) bother to even point it out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe he didn't hear right and thinks they were talking about votes on "Khrushchev."
Edited on Fri Aug-15-08 07:40 PM by beac
"Yup, that Khrushchev is a wily one and I certainly wouldn't miss any votes about an finding alternate for him, by cracky. I hear good things about this Brezhnev fellow!"

Deaf old bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC