Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The new Kerry ad SUCKS!!! (One might say, "sucks donkey")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:20 AM
Original message
The new Kerry ad SUCKS!!! (One might say, "sucks donkey")
Edited on Mon Aug-23-04 11:29 AM by troublemaker
This refers to a new Kerry ad I just saw on TV (not the John McCain debate ad, which I love, but is so far only on the internet)

The new TV ad says that Bush is attacking Kerry's record, and that Bush did it to McCain and now he's doing it to Kerry.

This is amateur hour. A presidential candidate is supposed to act, not be acted upon. If Bush is now "doing it to Kerry" then Kerry is painted as a rape victim. That's a short-cut to defeat.

The correct political form is to stand up for the rights of people who cannot defend themselves, not complain about your own powerlessness.

Wouldn't this be more effective?
Does George Bush have a problem with people who fought for America? In 2000 he backed smears attacking Vietnam veteran John McCain's honorable service record, and questioning the loyalty of men who faced torture while serving America. Today Bush is backing smears against Vietnam veteran John Kerry; smears that paint the enlisted men Kerry led in battle as cowards and liars... President Bush even refuses to distance himself from lies that question the worth of every medal ever won by any Vietnam veteran. The best way to support our troops is to get rid of Bush and his anti-military smears. America can do better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Much ado about nothing ....
this is nit picking ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. Most TV era elections are decided by nit-picking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are you talking about with one with McCain?
I think it works great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. The McCain aad is great. The new TV ad sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. The internet ad with McCain is MUCH MORE EFFECTIVE
Why they aren't putting it on TV is a mystery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Kerry's campaign isn't exactly showing grace under pressure, IMO
They were caught off guard and now they are on the defensive spending WAY too much money on this issue.

Why even DEVELOP the internet only ad if you're going to develop a 2nd one?

That's even MORE money from the dwindling $75 they have left to spend.

*Shaking my head*

We CAN'T lose this one folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Wrong ...
You spend money when it does the most good .... not according to a preset plan that doesnt take into account a changing battlefield ...

NOW is the time to go after the SBLiars .... NOW is the time to MAKE CLEAR that his duty was honorable, and that Bush failed to do his duty .....

This SBL fiasco is going to be a godsend for Kerry, since it focused on what Kerry had done .... and on what Bush did not do ....

NOW is the time to make the disinctions, while the media is on tap ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. No..the TIME to go after them was when they first gained traction
Edited on Mon Aug-23-04 11:40 AM by jackstraw45
that first week...not a MONTH after they've been spewing lies.

Their timing was off and now, instead of one forceful smackdown, they are playing catch-up with THREE costly ads that each cost money to produce and even more to air on TV.

But feel free to live in your own vision of reality.

If we all think like that, we'll have 4 more years to ask what went wrong....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Yeah ....
Not listening to you cost us the last election ...

I see what you mean ....

The 'Best time' to respond is NOW, and NOT whine and bitch and moan about missed opportunities that have already passed us by ....

There is more than one way to skin a cat, and though Im sure you know the only 'true' way, I didnt think that ad in question was SO bad as to deserve a bunch of whining and hand wringing here ....

Then again: I didnt listen to you last election: and see what happened ?? ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. You mean the one with the 2000 Republican debates!?
The one where McCain says that Bush should be ashamed, and that America can do better? If so, I must disagree. I thought it was great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think the poster is talking about the TV ad.
It's not hard hitting enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheelhombre Donating Member (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. The internet ad was potent, the tv ad is weak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troublemaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. The McCain aad is great. The new TV ad sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. McCain may have requested that his likeness not be used on TV...
Or if they do use it, they may think McCain will ask them to withdraw it...That would look like "weakness".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Whoops. I live in MA, so...
... we've gotten a bare minimum of campaign ads this year. I'm in the dark over here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mistress Quickly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Also, isn't the credibility of McCain
in question here in relation to Kerry? I mean, he says that stuff about bush in the 2000 election, but now he is campaigning for him now. To an uninformed person, it comes across as forgiveness, McCain forgave bush, so bush couldn't have been that bad right? (sheeple thinking)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. AAAAAAAAAHHHHH! OH MY GOD!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAH!!!! HOLY!!! AAAAAAAAAH
You done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalBushFan Donating Member (831 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. The McCain debate ad is internet only?!?
Shit. For a second I was optimistic that Kerry was doing something right. And the TV ad does suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsMyParty Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Indeed, you writing of the message is so much better. It is a message
of power. It brings vets to Kerry's side as they say "yeah, that's right, asshole, you are insulting and questioning all of us you loser". At this level of the political ladder with the money that is spent on these ads, there is no excuse for the kind of ad writing we have so often seen. You ad affixes the blame to Bush and shows Kerry standing with the people who served against the person who ran away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Monday morning QB...
MUCH better writing, ('cept forgetting Cleland) I give you that! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. Did Someone Fellate A Donkey?
Who?


Who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qwertyMike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
21. I think it's GREAT
"Get back to the issues"

All that swifvet shit was designed to keep Kerry busy.
Anything but the issues. Now the swiftvet thing is dead. Timing's perfect. Almost September. The Mantra now should be "Let's talk issues"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southern Patriot Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-23-04 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Exactly. Do something to put the Bushies on the defensive
for a change.

Introduce another dynamic in the discussion and make them react to Kerry.

Here's one idea: I think that seniors are getting pretty dissatisfied with the medicare card. Put together a a media/pr campaign combining senior organizations and the Kerry campaign. Start hitting hard with senior first person "horror stories." Highlight Kerry's alternative. Best of all do it in Florida, NYC (for great media coverage) and Ohio.

Make Bush defend his legislation against your grandparents' complaints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC