Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

Crooks and Liars: McCain Debunks His Own Anbar Gaffe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:01 PM
Original message
Crooks and Liars: McCain Debunks His Own Anbar Gaffe
Crooks and Liars

As we reported earlier today, Senator McCain was caught reinventing the Anbar awakening time line during an interview with Katie Couric Tuesday an interview CBS inexplicably edited to cover up for McCain.

Well, today HuffPos Seth Colter Walls has dug up even more proof that the awakenings most important progress occurred before the surge plan was publicly announced let alone implemented including remarks from John McCain and Joe Lieberman from an American Enterprise Institute speech in January 2007.


Too often the light at the tunnel has turned out to be a train, but I really believe I really believe that theres a strong possibility that you may see a very substantial change in Anbar province due to this new changes in our relationships with the sheiks in the region. But its important, as I said in my opening remarks, that this troop surge be significant and sustained. Otherwise, dont do it.


I wrote last week of a conversation I had after John and I and our delegation met with our military leadership in Anbar province a tough, brilliant, committed group of soldiers making progress there, turning the Sunni sheiks in that province to our side against Al Qaeda.

The McCain campaign released a statement last night in which they claim that the surge helped consolidate earlier gains in Anbar, but thats not what McCain said in his original remarks:

Because of the surge we were able to go out and protect that sheik and others. And it began the Anbar awakening. I mean, thats just a matter of history.

So either McCain is lying about the Anbar timeline, or hes simply confused about what happened and when. Either way, this has to be problematic for a candidate who is running on the sole platform of being better equipped to handle the war.

If I could venture a guess, I would say that McCain deliberately distorted the effects of the surge in order to argue that it alone is responsible for the the reduction in violence. As I said earlier, McCains only hope for winning in November is to convince enough voters that the surge is the only reason were winning in Iraq, and the he is primarily responsible for it. Once Barack Obama challenged that narrative by pointing out the Anbar awakening was already taking shape and fighting back against al Qaeda before the troop increase, McCain was left with no choice but to re-write history to comport with the version hes trying to tell.

UPDATE: Heres what McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds said yesterday about Obama:

If Barack Obama had had his way, the Sheiks who started the Awakening would have been murdered at the hands of al Qaeda.

Well as it turns out, the sheik cited by McCain and Bounds was tragically murdered last year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WHEN CRABS ROAR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. You have to keep it simple for Americans, oh, and lie too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. let's play the table/turning game. what if Obama had said something similar?
you'd NEVER hear the end of it, especially when this single issue is turning out to the CENTERPIECE of this pathetic campaign. it's THE major daily talking point being churned out in the blastfax boiler room. it's all they've got at this point

and the media are following the RNC lead, as usual

you won't hear/see/read ANYthing about this, as the story's already old day old, so there's no need to discuss it anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Oct 17th 2017, 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC