Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pretend that you are Majority Whip Dick Durbin for a moment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:19 AM
Original message
Pretend that you are Majority Whip Dick Durbin for a moment
And your task is to get the votes to sustain a filibuster on the FISA bill that was passed today. If you get to 40, your good friend Senator Obama has promised you that he will be the 41st vote that you need. Senator Kennedy can return to the Senate if absolutely necessary.

Here's the list of how everyone voted today...

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=2&vote=00168

So the initial count is 28. Add Ted Kennedy and that's 29. Whitehouse, Mikulski, and Inouye are all pretty reliably liberal Senators from blue states. So we have 32. Max Baucus and Kent Conrad are from more libertarian western states and their colleagues from those states voted NEA so maybe I could convince them. That's 34. Casey usually pretty liberal except on abortion and is pretty popular so I could probably get him to switch. That's 35. Kohl is also usually pretty liberal and easily re-elected so that's 36.

At this point I'm left with Feinstein, Rockefeller, Pryor, Nelson, Nelson, Landrieu, Johnson, and Bayh. Feinstein is pretty hawkish but maybe I could convince her to see the light or at least do me a favor. That's 37. Rockefeller has been in the Senate for a long time and likely will never face a competitive challenge for the rest of his career. But he also sits on the intelligence committee and spent a great deal of time ironing out a bill that the President would sign. So getting him is iffy.

Best case scenario (and let me emphasize best case) I have 38 votes and I need to find two more from six centrists Democrats in very red states who always vote as though their re-election is coming up because even if they don't get a serious challenge this time around, they are likely to at some point before they become entrenched.

Can you see a scenario where we get 41 votes on this? Because I really can't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. You have a point-can't really see it with those 7
I would dump Feinstein in with the no-hope crowd.

Landrieu, Bayh and Feinstein-3 "Democrats" I can't stand (but still probably better than their Repuke alternatives-at least with Bayh and Landrieu. Now that is a scary thought).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Infinitely better than their repuke alternatives
Landrieu does wonderful work for our veterans and military when her Repuke alternatives would rather use that money to give rich people tax cuts. She votes with her constituents on social issues because she pretty much has to. But on the less high-profile issues there is miles worth of difference between her and the people she runs against.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Good to know-I have mostly just followed their environmental track records
And Landrieu's is pretty bad (especially for a Dem).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. It's an oil producing state, no way to get elected without taking that into consideration
Believe me I'm an environmentalist and I will say the same thing about my state that I say about Michigan. Nobody from our delegation should ever chair a committee that oversees environmental legislation and under no circumstances should we have the first primary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cookie monster Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. No Republicans voted Nay
None.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's amazing ...
I've been lurking here all day watching the madness, and that's the *first* time I've seen someone say that so plainly.

Naturally I may have missed something and probably did, but still.

I'd just like to thank you for pointing that out.

And welcome to DU. :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. hey, it's a whole OP now! :-D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nam78_two Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. And yet most so-called "libertarians" tend to vote Repuke
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 12:33 AM by nam78_two
At least the ones I know :shrug: -I guess some "liberties" are more equal than others.
Welcome to DU btw :hi:.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. There go those Republicans voting in "lockstep"
Just poking fun at the fact that that's frowned upon in these corners, though it proves effective depending on the situation.

So...

Why didn't the Democrats - not just Obama - do the same?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. You joined here just to tell us that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Who knows ...

But considering the vast majority of the comments on DU today, everything from emigration announcements (and the associated "wish I could go with you" comments) to declarations that the FISA vote today is the final inspiration for people to leave the Democratic party, I'd say one could be forgiven for at least *thinking* it needed to be said.

Hell, I've wanted to say it a dozen times or more, but I've been here too long and am too cynical to think anyone would pay attention.

Perhaps a bit of new blood from people who can still see the obvious is what's needed around here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. The math just wasn't there for a filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. I think a better question
is how many people would have joined a filibuster had Obama spoken out in favor of one, as he had in the past?
He's a very eloquent speaker and there's a good possibility he'll be the next president; I've got to imagine he could have had a significant affect on the outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Obama is a persuasive man, but tell me what Senators he could've convinced
Say Obama was willing to help Durbin and persuade other Senators. Give me 41 names and an explanation for how we get them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. Come on, tell the truth, you just wanted an excuse
to say "majority whip dick."

:rofl: :applause:

By the way - I believe your explanation of the above is spot on.

Kicked and recommended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. HAHA I honestly hadn't even thought of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's an interesting exercise. But the premises are far fetched.
If Barack had indeed said he would vote to sustain, if need be, i would ask him to lobby his fellow Senators, such as Landrieu, who might benefit from his presence at her campaign rally in LA.

I would also ask Senator Clinton to lobby Feinstein, Bayh, Pryor, and Nelson (Fla), since they were all prominent supporters during her presidential run.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. As I keep saying we have a long term journey to change hearts and minds to repair Ameirca.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. "If you want to be a politician, you have to know how to count." --- LBJ
The Democratic leadership knew there were not sufficient votes to filibuster. As you point out, which of the right of center Dems would we move on this vote? Feinstein? Nelson?

There are simply too many Democratic senators who wanted to go along on this one, for whatever reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tkmorris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
17. What I would have liked to have seen...
Was Obama going to those Senators and telling them "Come January, your state can kiss my tight black ass, unless you vote against cloture right NOW". But of course, that would never happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC