Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressman John Yarmuth is Obama's Best Choice for Vice-President and Why Webb Would be a Mistake

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:28 AM
Original message
Congressman John Yarmuth is Obama's Best Choice for Vice-President and Why Webb Would be a Mistake
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 12:31 AM by Avalon6
Picking Jim Webb would be a mistake for Obama. As Webb endorsed Obama late, it remains to be seen whether he would be a good campaigner or even a good surrogate for Obama. Obama does not need national security credentials in an election year where the economy is the main concern. Picking Webb to bolster his national security experience may backfire as it would shift the political debate from the economy (an argument Obama easily wins) to national security (where even with Webb, McCain will still be the perceived as the stronger candidate for national security)

Congressman John Yarmuth of Kentucky is a freshman congressman that won election in a key swing district and would make a great choice for Obama's message of change because he hasn't been involved in Washington politics for very long. He endorsed Obama early on even when it was apparent Hillary would win big in Kentucky! Even being from Kentucky, Yarmuth is a progressive (unlike Webb). He would serve as an effective voice for wooing blue-collar voters that have been hit hard by the economy and hails from a region that would be crucial in the GE (Kentucky borders Ohio, Indiana, Missouri, and Virginia. Yarmuth is also Jewish and he will help Obama court Jewish voters.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Yarmuth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. US Senators or Governors or former of same. House reps need not apply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I disagree. Picking an unknown candidate as a running mate would be great for Obama.
The media would focus more on the VP selection and his biographical information and not the fact that he didn't pick Hillary as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. They woudl focus on the fact that it would be the most inexperienced team ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Change beats experience in this election easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. And Obama has the message of change easily
Why not try to close the experience gap while he's at it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. not foolish, unjustified change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. No, they'd ridicule the choice and say "Obama really blew this one!"
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 12:45 AM by TexasObserver
It ain't gonna happen. Do you even know the last time a House member was named as the VP for the Democratic party? Or how that turned out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. That would be Geraldine Ferraro...
a Democrat probably wouldn't have won that year anyway, but Mondale wasn't the best candidate (I don't think Gary Hart would've suffered a 49-state blowout).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
34. Mondale and Ferraro barely got more electoral votes than you and me.
It would have been hard for any Democrat to win in 84, but Mondale was a terrible choice, and Ferraro as VP a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
21. No. They'd ridicule him for picking a bland nobody Congressman without any
legislative accomplishments to his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Then I like that "mistake."
Webb is my top choice. National Security as an issue won't go away. Also I think McCain has the Jewish vote all locked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. "McCain has the Jewish vote all locked up" Is this satire?
I believe Gallup's last poll had Obama beating McCain 2-1 among Jewish Voters, and this was a couple weeks back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waldnorm Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Disagree on McCain and Jews
Most Jews will vote Democrat. The Wolfowitz/Liebermans only are appealing to the "neocon" section, hoping to make it grow, and it may be a disturbing growing minority, but he'd get a third, at best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Maybe Lieberman has poisoned my mind.
Glad to hear I'm wrong on the Jewish issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
31. Yeah, get that
lieberman outta your mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. A Freshman Congressmen? Is this satire?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. I like John Yarmuth
but I'd hate like hell to see that district revert back into the hands of Anne Northup in his absence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, at least when people say Obama has little experience
he can point to his vp choice and say "Yeah, but I've got more than him!".

Come on, get real. A freshman house member?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Didn't we already have this experience debate? Change won over experience easily
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. No, because you're discounting his experience.
And you're inflating her experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. I'm sorry but you are not going to win the experience against McCain
He served 25 years in the Senate and is a military veteran. Obama is not going to win voters by trying to be something that he is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
35. the quality of the experience matters. McCain's is a lifetime of bad experience.
He's indistinguishable from Bush, and that hobbles him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #23
44. what does experience matter when McCAIN F***ING SUCKS
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 03:19 AM by Skittles
if anything it just means he has SUCKED FOR A LONG TIME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #9
45. Easily?
It went to the last day of the primaries, and he needed superdelegates to go over the top, and he won without the majority of democrats voting for him. I'd hardly call that "easy".

And even if he did win easily, it doesn't mean that he should pick someone even less experienced than him - that's just silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
10. National security isn't Jim Webb's only strong issue, though.
He's an economic populist who's not really all that far from John Edwards on economic issues (and one of only six members of the Senate Progressive Caucus).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. Who gives a crap when he endorsed Obama. Then that takes Richardson out too btw.
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 12:44 AM by kerry-is-my-prez
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. That's what we need. A guy with only one year in the lower house of Congress,
no other experience, who hails from a state we can't win, and who has absolutely nothing goin' for him but:

1. He's a Jew.
2. He's a white guy, like virtually everyone else on Obama's VP short list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Jim Webb also only has 1 year in Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Jim Webb is a Senator, was the Secretary of the Navy, and is a Decorated Veteran.
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 12:54 AM by hnmnf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. By your logic, Senator Bryd would make a great VP candidate
He is after all the longest serving senator in history and former senate majority leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Are you for real?
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 01:00 AM by hnmnf
You dont even make sense. Because I'm against a freshman Rep. you think I want the man with more experience in Washington than anybody else. In case you havent noticed, I'm arguing for Senator Webb. Get a frickin clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. You really shouldn't have voted for Obama then if you care that much about experience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Like most voters, I have an experience threshold. If a candidate
passes it, great. I move on to other considerations.

Belief that 35 years is not necessarily better than 15 years is not the same as belief that 0 years is as good as 15 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. I see you're buying Hillary's commander in chief threshold arguement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. He didnt say say anything about commander in chief
It was about experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. I'll refresh you're mind
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 01:14 AM by Avalon6
She made a convoluted argument about how Obama wasn't qualified for President but could qualify for vice-president in the middle of the campaign. She said there was some threshold that Obama would arbitrary cross before the convention, allowing him to have enough experience to become VP. Remember, it's not my argument but hers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. I'm talking about Occam Bandage. He wasnt referring to the CIC threshold that Hillary talked of
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 01:15 AM by hnmnf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. No. Her argument is that she (and McCain) have reached a threshold of experience, and that
Obama has not. I disagree with that assertion. I believe that all three have the minimum qualifications necessary to be President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #33
38. I want a VP that helps the nominee with perceived weaknesses
So yea, experience matters. And I dont really see how a freshman Representative in a state we arent winning in the fall really does anything at al..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. No, Byrd is a terrible pick for other reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Let's look at the differences.
1. Jim Webb was Secretary of the Navy.
2. Jim Webb is a national name.
3. Jim Webb is from a state Obama can flip.
4. Jim Webb is a war hero.
5. Jim Webb is a Senator, not a Representative.

Yarmuth brings about as much to the ticket as your average School Board member does. The only things he has going for him are his Jewishness (which is a dubious plus) and his lack of any accomplishments whatsoever (which you brand as "change.") Neither of those are particularly rare traits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. Doesn't that legitimatize McCain's arguments for experience also though?
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 01:00 AM by Avalon6
It's a double edged sword. More people care about President than VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. ...what?
Are you posting drunk, or is your mind really this disorganized? You're all over the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalon6 Donating Member (206 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. I'm sorry if you have trouble reading between the lines
And I thought personal attacks were against the rules in this forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yotun Donating Member (346 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
53. Dude, even if you're right it doesn't matter.
It may be that he's the best man for the job, and that experience doesn't mean anything. It may be that he'll do the most good for the country, and that a rational analysis will show him to be a good choice. BUT, what matters when picking the VP isn't wht a rational analysis will show, but how it appears to the electorate, and if they'll buy it. So you may be right on all counts- BUT if you have such difficulty making the case, and convincing people in DU, one of the most democratically partisan websites on the internet, where the members will vote for the democrat no matter what, then that is all the proof you need, that you won't be able to convince the rest of the country. Even if you are indeed right, the fact that you have such difficulty proving you are right here, shows he is not a good choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
29. Obama needs someone strong on the economy
but also with some FP experience.

I think it was quoted best on tweety's show earlier tonight. Women vote democratic when the message is about the economy, health care and education. But when its foreign policy, they tend to favor republicans.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
46. You make a strong argument...for Tim Kaine.
He has everything you mentioned, but real executive experience. FYI, he's the governor of VA and is from MO. And, he was the first national politician to endorse Barack.

I read over Yarmuth's bio and I didn't see where he has executive experience at all. Did I miss it? It seems that will be a very important consideration in an economy-driven election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
47. I don't believe a one-term congressman is a good choice for Obama
We also need him to hold that district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
48. Please no...

It has to be someone who would be ready to step in and be President.

It's not just about winning the election.... it has to be someone who could govern if something happened to Obama.



we don't need a "Congressman Who-The-Fuck-is-That?" on the ticket.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsomuah Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
49. So what? We're all nominating our congressmen now? j/k.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. Why not? This was done well. Others find fault with the idea, but it wasn't inflammatory.
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 09:05 AM by cryingshame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsomuah Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Dude I was cracking a joke. Relax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
52. IMO, not a good idea to have a VP who most voters will go "who?" when they....
hear her/his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC