http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/327628Clinton and Obama Reverse Roles
posted by John Nichols on 06/07/2008 @ 4:57pm
snip//
Clinton was gracious, and clear about her support for Obama. When some supporters booed her announcement of support for the candidate they had worked so hard to beat, the former First Lady said it would "break my heart" if hurt feelings on the part of her supporters in any way undermined Obama's fall campaign against John McCain.
"(The) Democratic Party is a family, and now it's time to restore the ties that bind us together," she said, quieting most of the boos.
Obama was equally gracious.
"Obviously, I am thrilled and honored to have Sen. Clinton's support," he said, in what after the long primary campaign is surely an understatement. "But more than that, I honor her today for the valiant and historic campaign she has run. She shattered barriers on behalf of my daughters and women everywhere, who now know that there are no limits to their dreams. And she inspired millions with her strength, courage and unyielding commitment to the cause of working Americans."
Of course, it is easier to be gracious when you are the winner.
That's the norm.
What is not the norm in American politics is the image of the commoner who challenged party royalty accepting his victory.
Though the focus, this day, is on Hillary Clinton -- and rightfully so -- the real drama, the real history, is in the fact that the roles have been reversed.
The candidate who was not supposed to have a chance is now going to be the Democratic nominee for president.
And his name is Barack Obama.