Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Is It Necessary For Her To Concede?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:01 AM
Original message
Why Is It Necessary For Her To Concede?
If it's over it's over. She isn't the umpire in the game. If she can't face or accept it, isn't that her problem? The rest of us will be moving on. There a McSame out there to McBeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because it is the right thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. It Is The Right Thing To Do
But if she can't step up, the rest of us should just move on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. While it is not,
events are going as scheduled. Things are good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thank God You're Around
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. The "error" in the
report on AP appears to be most likely attributed to people from her campaign being tired, and some general confusion as they shut-down the effort. It is known that yesterday, in an "0ff-the-record" discussion, Harold I. told someone they know the contest is over. And Terry M. said something on NBC that indicated that Senator Clinton would speak about Obama's having the delegates needed to be the nominee.

However, no campaign is supposed to discourage voters when there are on-going elections. This is much like the networks agreeing not to release east coast numbers while the west coast polls are open.

Senator Clinton wants to do well today, in order to strengthen her leverage during the convention. Two of her top people are still hoping she can be VP.

There is a lot of tension and confusion associated with events like today. But it will turn out well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Apparently She's Now Throwing Her Hat Into The Veepstake
Sadly, she and Bill have too much baggage for this to be a reality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. That's two people .....
named Bill and Harold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Party unity. Now in shreds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. She don't have to concede....But it would be better if she did....
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 11:10 AM by Tippy
Conceding is not required but in order for all supporters to go on they usually do it....I am so upset now with Clinton changin her mind about bowing out.....I understand her supporters are probably going nuts about now....It is really a diservice to them...They won't even view it that way till later....WHO is at fault....The super deligates that's who they could have ended it early today....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. If she doesn't concede she still gets press coverage
and she can still convince some gullible people to donate to her campaign, and she can then use those contributions to repay herself the money she loaned the campaign.

If she conceded only an idiot would contribute.

Obama could repay her campaign debt but he should make her (or Bill) publicly beg first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. Amazing, isn't it?
Obama has moved on. He hasn't spent a single red cent arguing against Clinton, but instead, has moved on to fight the real enemy, McCain. Yet his supporters just can't get over the love of hating. Sad, really. They are railing against nothing. They are ignoring Obama's requests, ignoring his lead. Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. It can help her supporters move on
If Clinton has the good of the party at heart, this is the proper thing to do. Graciously concede and then help the candidate in whatever capacity he desires. This sets a good example for her supporters and shows party unity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Because it would be much needed medicine
If she concedes and offers her support to Obama, it will be like sterile water, Bactine and clean bandages to the wounds the party has given itself during the primary. If she does not, our wounds will likely fester and leave scars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
11. Because GD:P needs to be nuked ASAP
At least that's my personal reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. And that's reason enough!
Do it for Skinner, Hillary!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. Is she's smart she would concede
Continuing on after Obama has the needed delegates makes her look like a poor loser, and that kind of public image will have a lasting impact on the legacy of both Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
13. She doesn't have to. However, how she handles this speaks volumes
about her character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Why is everyone expecting a concession from a senator who would not
Edited on Tue Jun-03-08 11:11 AM by DesertedRose
apologize for her war vote? That speaks volumes as well.

:shrug:

I'm certainly not expecting one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I am not expecting her to act any different, then the way she has been
so I don't expect her to do the classy and honorable thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
24. If she does give one, I guarantee it will be ME ME ME ME him ME ME ME ME ME
and will be the least sincere 'concession' ever made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. Party unity. Obama shouldn't have to worry about knives in his back.
How can we fight an effective campaign if Obama has to split his time and attention between McCain and Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
16. She can't endorse the nominee without conceding first, I'm pretty sure.
And if she doesn't endorse the nominee, then she's betraying the party and failing to do what's best for the country. So not conceding would be an act of sheer political hubris, ultimately, that would only hurt the Clintons. She'll concede; she has no choice, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
19. So that our long national nightmare can be over.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
20. I think her tone is more important.
I am more concerned about content than form. I think it would cross a line though for her to continue to win Obama's committed delegates after he definitely has a majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
22. It isn't - she can keep campaigning for the rest of her life if she chooses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
23. she's not conceding
she's going to suspend her campaign

there is a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. Because her supporters need closure
So that they don't have to spend the next 3 months like they have the last 2 - living on a hope that's been perpetrated by a myth, only to be forced to face reality, their disappointment and their anger a mere 9 weeks before the general election.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-03-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. "Suspension," given previous threats of a Convention fight will send a message to Democrats
it will undermine unity in a big way... without a super-endorsement and whole hearted support

we'll see how it goes, but I don't trust her advisors to have the best interests of the party at heart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC