Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Favorite Leiberman Quote from the Debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Lobo_13 Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:17 PM
Original message
Favorite Leiberman Quote from the Debate
"Saying capturing Saddam doesn't make this country safer because there are still terrorists is like saying that defeating the Nazi's doesn't make us safer because Stalin and the communists are still there."

Does he realize that he proved Dean's point?

What the f was he thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. He WASN'T thinking!
Come on, this is Lieberman we're talking about!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lieberman backstage live on C-Span....
still attacking Dean mercilessly. He'll never get my vote EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He's obviously
too fucking stupid to realize that the more he slams and cuts down Dean, the worse he looks and the more support Dean gets. Either that, or he's just unbelievably arrogant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Lieberman and Kerry attack Dean more than they attack Bush
This indicates that they are desparate men. Especially Lieberman. His candidacy is more about Him versus Dean than anything.




John
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zeke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. WRONG.
Lieberman's candidacy is mostly about running against Gore for not supporting him instead of Dean.

"I'll show you, Al, for not supporting me!"

It's kinda like the GOP going over Quayle and nominating Bush Two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LatteLib Donating Member (205 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Agreed
And I think he is a horrible little man for all of his attacks. He is way too desperate. He is self defeating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zeke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Hear. Hear.
Give a man enough rope and he'll hang himself.

The bright side: the more Dean gets bashed and stays on his feet, it seems the more teflon outer-shell he grows.

Let the other Dems do so much bashing that come fall, voters will tune out Bush Inc's bashing, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nomaco-10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. He's gone beyond hurting Dean....
he's hurting the whole of the democratic party. I would not vote for him under any circumstances ever. I not only want my country, I want my party back. I wrote Lieberman an e-mail weeks ago and ask him why didn't he just go ahead and cross the aisle and make it official.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cascadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. I know it sounds crazy but....
I sometimes tend to think that Lieberman is really a Republican agent sent to divide and destroy the Democratic Party. And he is doing a crummy job at it too!

Give it up Joe and go to the Republicans!



John

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zeke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Good Man.
Yeah, I wrote the DNC before XMAS telling them to kick that asshole Georgia senator off the team---can't think of his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
askew Donating Member (162 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. That was revolting.
He was backstage just spinning RW talking points about Dean. I am so sick of Lieberman. I can't wait for him to get out of this race. Republican callers on C-Span are now calling Lieberman a Republican. Just shut up, Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. I liked the bit about Howard's record answer not being appropriate.
Edited on Sun Jan-04-04 05:27 PM by cynicalSOB1
Your not saying what I want. Basically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Roosevelt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. And I don't think he realizes he made Dean's point
when Dean said that people didn't really get a tax cut (except the wealthy) because tuition and property taxes went up. Lieberman was quick to criticize (something about $1800 for an Iowa family), but then later in the debate he stated that states needed help on education because property taxes were going up...hmmm, Earth to Lieberman...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoctorMyEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I caught that too!
It made me laugh my ass off. What a frikkin' idiot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R3dD0g Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. I wrote Gore in 2000
and told him his running mate was a sanctimonious little twit and that I would be voting for Gore in spite of - not because of his running mate.

Of course by then it was too late and we all know how much help the oh so moral little twit was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DoctorMyEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. There's a total disconnect!
I could puke every time he invokes Clintons record as his own.

What about the "I'm a Clinton Democrat!" line?

Not only is it bullshit, but it just goes to show what a Republican shill he is. As badly as the right wingers hate all things Clinton they fall all over themselves to tell us how "Lieberman is the only Democrat with a chance next November" and "Lieberman would raise the level of discourse" - just for our own good of course.... the pubbies only have our best interests at heart! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. You know, *we* may hate Lieberman
Edited on Sun Jan-04-04 05:43 PM by incapsulated
And a lot of hardcore dems may as well. But that is not the feeling most people have about him, not even a lot of democrats if you look at the polls. The shit he slings at the other candidates can hurt them, they are not being dismissed out of hand by ordinary americans tuning in. He is dangerous, and not a joke, in this regard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. You're right. But he's just destroying his candidacy even further with
the crap.

So you have to ask yourself, what's the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebgrkng Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. What am I missing?
Edited on Sun Jan-04-04 06:24 PM by thebgrkng
I am in no way a Lieberman supporter, but that attack makes sense to me.

I (will make/can see) an arguement that not having gone into Iraq in the first place would have made us safer today.

BUT,

We had already gone down the attack Iraq path, there is no going back on that, we have done it. That being where we are, we are safer and better off having Saddam captured. Capturing Saddam was/is critical to success in Iraq.

We can't root for failure and expect to lead.


edited because I accidently used brackets...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. What are you missing?
1. Define "success" in Iraq
2. Define "success" in the war on terror
3. Define "success" in protecting the country (as in domestic necessities - education, helath care, safety, security)

BTW - we're NOT better off having SH captured in the WAY he was captured. Period!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebgrkng Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I don't think its that,
(these are all pretty off the cuff)
1.
From an Iraqi POV
A stable iraq; with some form of representitive gov't; recognized and accepted by it's neighbors; non-threatening to its neighbors.

From a U.S. POV
Open accountable economy (no sweetheart deals), stop the insurgents. slowly withdrawal forces as possible. get more international support.

2. This doesn't really matter, and that was Liebermans point. It's a seperate threat. I think its great when any Dem goes out and says that Iraq was a diversion from the war against al queda.

I havent heard a single candidate go out and say "Well, we captured Saddam, the war on terror is over. All you 'evildoers' out there can go home."

3. Again it doesnt matter. Iraq has turned into a big mess. Getting Saddam out of there is critical for progress. People were scared he was coming back. The sooner we can succeed in Iraq, the sooner we can refocus all the resources we wasted IN iraq.

BTW -
We've got to agree to disagree on this point. Saddam was caught in a little hole in the ground. I think it is important for Iraqi people to realize that he isnt coming back.

The way I look at this is to swap Bush with some Dem candidate. If Dean/Kerry/Clark/Whoever was Pres tomorrow, and then caught Saddam it would still be a very important step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-04 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. I can't remember anything he said.
REally! I can't!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC