|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Skinner
ADMIN ![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:38 AM Original message |
Obviously, Senator Clinton's comment was a huge gaffe. But I think it's apparent that her intent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Higher Standard
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. Thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CabalPowered
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 08:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
453. Kiss my ass. Just sayin' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steely_Dan
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:45 PM Response to Reply #453 |
509. Oh, That's Mature... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 09:10 AM Response to Reply #509 |
550. Yes it was and I apologize to the poster. But still not admitting to being mature. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue State Bandit
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 02:51 AM Response to Reply #1 |
521. I agree that malice was not her intent. But... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 03:01 AM Response to Reply #1 |
522. To quote one of Tom Lehrer's best songs: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerryster
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 06:49 AM Response to Reply #522 |
533. Were those the lines... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 07:08 AM Response to Reply #533 |
537. Yep, those were the lines: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerryster
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 09:28 AM Response to Reply #537 |
552. Yep!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 09:45 AM Response to Reply #552 |
557. In that case, we have identical bias! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:40 AM Response to Original message |
2. ALERTED!1!!! No, I mean recommended. Excellent post. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
3. It's not a gaffe if you do it repeatedly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:52 AM Response to Reply #3 |
44. Bingo. For those pushing the "gaffe" meme today.. it was a TALKING POINT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:56 AM Response to Reply #44 |
53. Yes, it was a talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:34 AM Response to Reply #53 |
130. Skinner is right on that point. Go watch the video. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:36 AM Response to Reply #130 |
135. It matters not in the least exactly when she realized the tactic would go badly for her, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #130 |
151. I've seen it a couple of times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #151 |
225. Well she was thinking "anything can happen"... absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #225 |
253. Clinton's grotesque remarks are never "un-intentional" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #130 |
366. Either way, she has no business being even near the WH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:57 PM Response to Reply #130 |
411. Well then she isn't as smart as everyone thinks she is because she said it in March too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #53 |
393. that is my problem with it - like Bosnia, you can't say its a slip up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #53 |
496. I agree totally with you WesDem. It is a horrible reference & it's been repeated. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DUlover2909
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 02:38 AM Response to Reply #53 |
520. Yeah Cenk did a whole bit on this. Pretty bad strategy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 06:08 AM Response to Reply #53 |
526. I guess Hillary is a serial-goofer! Keeps making the same goof over again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:00 AM Response to Reply #3 |
61. Once is a mistake. Three times is a pattern. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:01 AM Response to Reply #61 |
65. Close. Three times is a TACTIC. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:50 AM Response to Reply #65 |
161. Good one! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #161 |
264. She's divisive and polarizing. She has no empathy. She's cruel and sadistic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rainlillie
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:39 PM Response to Reply #264 |
481. I toatlly agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #65 |
313. DING DING DING! BlooInBloo, you're our grand prize winner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #313 |
381. Actually, somewhere downthread I saw that it's *5* times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #65 |
327. Very true, and her "apology" indicates she didn't see the problem with using that example. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:47 AM Response to Reply #61 |
224. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOS
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #224 |
233. A pattern? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #224 |
283. No they don't - she knew her husband had the math he needed by March - she knew Obama had the math |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #283 |
422. Hillary rely on the truth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
disndat
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:32 PM Response to Reply #283 |
476. She forgot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Heathen57
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #224 |
296. The pattern is that she has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:01 PM Response to Reply #224 |
412. Except that she misrepresented the facts. That primary season was shorter than this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #412 |
465. hilary misrepresent the facts?!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:16 PM Response to Reply #224 |
500. If they don't start until March, obviously they go into June. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Creideiki
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:42 PM Response to Reply #61 |
426. That's really not a road you want to go down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #3 |
136. Agreed! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #136 |
145. There you go! It was explained perfectly... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerryster
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 07:00 AM Response to Reply #136 |
536. Re; Olbermann |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XtraProudDem
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 08:34 AM Response to Reply #536 |
544. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XtraProudDem
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 08:36 AM Response to Reply #536 |
545. And another thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulfcoastliberal
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #3 |
169. Nor is it very savvy. I don't understand how she's smart & savvy when she's said it several times? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #169 |
290. Clintons have become as 'smart and savvy' about elections as the Bushes. Ruining the entire party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IllinoisBirdWatcher
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #3 |
178. Let's look in detail at this "reasoned" analysis and responses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #178 |
234. a very good, well thought out analysis. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #178 |
291. Excellent Analysis. For more reasoned than the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #291 |
447. Only if your conclusion preceeds and directs your logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #178 |
333. PLEASE make this an OP if it already isn't one. Excellent ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #333 |
561. I second that request! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #178 |
359. Solid analysis from IllinoisBirdWatcher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:52 PM Response to Reply #359 |
409. Yep, pretty apparent where the leanings go. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #178 |
373. THIS is the real reasoned argument. THIS POST DESTROYS THE OP'S ARGUMENT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #373 |
382. What Zhade said. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #178 |
375. Well said and welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #178 |
380. Excellent response, IBW! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:05 PM Response to Reply #178 |
414. Exactly. Great response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
galloglas
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:55 PM Response to Reply #178 |
490. You just skinned Skinner! Welcome!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #3 |
186. Thank you. Secondly, you cannot compare theses primaries to those. We're at the end, not the start. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MessiahRp
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
216. Yep. Sorry Skinner but you're wrong on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PoliticalAmazon
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
378. She was wrong about the length of the RFK's campaign... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
juno jones
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #378 |
416. I wish I could find it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrsT
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
4. "Was it a stupid thing to say? Obviously. " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:42 AM Response to Original message |
6. I don't think it would have hit as hard if her apology had been genuine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #6 |
100. Her apologies are never genuine. She seems genetically incapable of being sorry except |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:37 PM Response to Reply #100 |
424. She's always "sorry"... that she got caught. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #424 |
435. Yep. That's the only thing she really is sorry about. (Same with Bill). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:27 AM Response to Reply #6 |
120. right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
7. the obama mob will be getting their torches and pitch forks and come after you for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Yes, it is probably time for today's Lord of the Flies re-enactment. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #17 |
277. Actually, it's Lord of the Flies on acid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
busymom
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
8. Thanks for a well-thought out post. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
9. Obama's Campaign was Classy as well as Savvy when they said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:25 AM Response to Reply #9 |
117. The good thing is that that's as far as he'll comment on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:35 AM Response to Reply #117 |
133. Thats why I appreciate the man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #133 |
137. He's already shown he's not afraid of McGramps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #137 |
185. Heh.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:45 AM Response to Reply #133 |
152. And it's not just class on his part, it's incredibly smart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #117 |
499. ha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
278. Obama stays classy and hilary pushes whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vattel
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 08:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
448. now that's funny n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
10. I agree with pretty much everything you said...but I would like to point out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:31 AM Response to Reply #10 |
125. except that when he e-mailed the news media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Levgreee
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #125 |
298. you are totally off the wall with your interpretation of KO's comment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerryster
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 07:16 AM Response to Reply #298 |
538. Are you sure? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XtraProudDem
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 08:45 AM Response to Reply #538 |
546. Stop it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
11. Thanks Skinner. I think it's very clear if you look at it with an unbiased eye. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
12. then why, with other examples available, did she use THIS one three times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
265. It sounds more and more that Hillary wants to BE LBJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnionPatch
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
370. Maybe those are the only two campaigns that went into June that she can think of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #370 |
397. I'm sorry, but I don't believe that, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnionPatch
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:42 PM Response to Reply #397 |
425. Well, I understand what you're saying, my husband says the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
13. Wow. Where to start. First of all, RFK had only been in the race for 3 months |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:57 AM Response to Reply #13 |
56. Crystal clear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:09 AM Response to Reply #56 |
84. Delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:44 AM Response to Reply #84 |
150. So what does the post make clear? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:18 AM Response to Reply #13 |
105. Things That Make You Go "Hmmmmm..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #13 |
226. Agreed. The army of straw men mustered in her defense blow away in a breeze of scrutiny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
275. So your leaving? Because what he posted was rational? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #275 |
361. no... you'll just be ignored |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #275 |
391. Who is it, so can take them off my ignore list if they're leaving |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
360. Makes me Go Hmmmmm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #13 |
394. What is now crystal clear? If you think that Skinner is baised, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
14. Thanks Skinner. I think it's very clear if you look at it with an unbiased eye. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
15. She's said this several times before. It's not a gaffe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
16. Well, she has been admonished by the NYT editorial board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftyladyfrommo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
18. This was so blown out of proportion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:19 AM Response to Reply #18 |
107. Blown out of proportion? Oh, please - don't even go there... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
urgk
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 07:26 PM Response to Reply #18 |
438. She may have meant no ill will toward Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ekelly
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:23 PM Response to Reply #18 |
470. Then why didn't she just say, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
19. I disagree. She has raised the specter of assassination before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #19 |
37. yes, she has raised it before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #19 |
38. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:52 AM Response to Reply #19 |
43. Her husband had the nomination sewn up in April |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masshole
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
20. Still a poor analogy for her to use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
21. I disagree completely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Hillary's assassination mind-set is troubling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryOldDem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:44 AM Response to Reply #21 |
149. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
22. Excellent post....let's see how many people call you an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonestonesusa
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:36 PM Response to Reply #22 |
249. Actually, you're the first person in this thread to use "asshole" or "hillbot" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #249 |
309. Of course I'm the first person....Anyone who said that to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonestonesusa
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:19 PM Response to Reply #309 |
326. I don't know - intuit what you want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondie58
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
23. I am trying to be open minded- I really am |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:08 AM Response to Reply #23 |
83. Phew. So much slipping. It's amazing she can even stay on her feet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
24. Fail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theoldman
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
25. I don't think that Hillary took the low road intensionally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
27. as her plausible routes to the nomination have been closed off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:47 AM Response to Reply #27 |
158. great post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #158 |
303. The saddest part of all of this is that she is only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marions ghost
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #303 |
328. all the more important |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #328 |
356. It's a hard lie for us to swallow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
28. Furthermore, the June thing is a red herring and she knows it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
29. No mathematical way of winning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:06 AM Response to Reply #29 |
77. "An intervention is needed by Tuesday, to end her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:15 AM Response to Reply #77 |
94. The intervention is coming from the Democratic Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cboy4
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:19 AM Response to Reply #94 |
109. That's a wonderful little cartoon, but I was mocking you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 08:10 PM Response to Reply #94 |
441. I hope that's true - and it's really the way it should be done. That is why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jerryster
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 07:24 AM Response to Reply #94 |
540. Is this fact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:10 AM Response to Reply #29 |
86. There are three scenarios for Clinton to win |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:33 AM Response to Reply #86 |
128. Hillary's RFK remarks spark widespread rebuke: a sampling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
symbolman
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #128 |
175. Pick AT the Scab?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftrightwingnut
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #128 |
268. I think that they were waiting for something -- anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RazBerryBeret
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
30. I DO think she seriously "misspeaks" more than any Lawyer should... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
362. Very Well Put |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kenny blankenship
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
417. Yes, well put |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
31. I disagree that her intent was innocuous. I don't think she is advocating |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:49 AM Response to Original message |
32. I give her the benefit that she doesn't wish harm on Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
33. LOL, more than a gaffe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
34. Isn't it gratuitious to pick the RFK race to demonstrate that though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #34 |
429. I think the kindest interpretation that can be given is that she picked 1968 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
35. She had so many other choices for her "long primary fight" example, but she went to RFK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #35 |
459. Right you are. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DB1
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
36. Respectfully disagree. More than a gaffe when there is a pattern of this kind of talk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
39. The Obama campaign won't have to actively use Clinton's gaffe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
40. I'm no fan of Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KSinTX
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
41. Words sometimes matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
42. No one makes a "gaffe" THREE TIMES!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekJ
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
45. Sorry Skinner. Historically, the race in 1968 was nothing like the one now. So her historical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CookCountyResident
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:01 AM Response to Reply #45 |
67. That's exactly how I reacted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
46. Ironically, it's the kind of "gotcha" politics that the Clintons have used against others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
47. Have you ever actually wondered about the 1968 primary and how different that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
48. I agree it was a mistake, but it's still very telling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 08:42 PM Response to Reply #48 |
455. Good post ginny! If it really was a gaffe why the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:24 PM Response to Reply #455 |
472. it's clear to me that she's just not able to admit to any weakness, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:32 PM Response to Reply #472 |
475. It's the worst in any work situation but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RichardRay
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
49. I'll go with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
50. thanks for your perspective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greiner3
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #50 |
310. No! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
51. I'm wondering how many times one can reference the unspeakable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:00 AM Response to Reply #51 |
62. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #51 |
78. I'm interested in seeing the other times she's said it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:14 AM Response to Reply #78 |
92. Here are the two previous quotes and the links from which they are taken... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #92 |
98. Thank you very much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #78 |
99. She said THE word in March to Time, and referenced the 'RFK tragedy' twice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #99 |
127. The Time one was the one I recalled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:38 AM Response to Reply #127 |
139. I see Spazito has linked to the reference in April, so that makes it 5. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #139 |
196. She did drop the direct reference to the actual assassination though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
52. Obviously, HRC's intent was to stay in hoping for some misstep ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftrightwingnut
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #52 |
274. Many games are played like that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asjr
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
54. Thank you very much Skinner. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:57 AM Response to Original message |
55. unacceptable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftrightwingnut
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #55 |
282. Cute. LOL n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shine
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
57. I totally agree with you, Skinner and I appreciate you being the Voice of Reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigbrother05
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
58. Why in the hell would Obama push this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner
ADMIN ![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:59 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Please go back and re-read my post. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:03 AM Response to Reply #58 |
70. his style of campaigning has shown that he won't, publicly, but according to the NYT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #70 |
80. Of course Obama won't say anything. He will continue to ignore her outbursts, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #80 |
110. What do you find interesting? What does it explain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #80 |
123. What exactly are you implying, oh sage novice? :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:42 AM Response to Reply #80 |
144. No. he is underhanded and manipulative...he does not ignore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonestonesusa
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #144 |
255. So why are you policing the methods Obama uses to get security? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #255 |
263. you misunderstood my post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonestonesusa
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #263 |
338. When did he suggest that Clinton want him assassinated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:28 PM Response to Reply #263 |
473. A newspaper runs a photo of Obama in the crosshairs...CNN picks it up and plays it over and again -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #70 |
122. As is their right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ScreamingMeemie
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #58 |
566. Errr... because candidates don't always do the "right thing" as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
59. I don't think a coordinated strategy can be called a "gaffe." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
glitch
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:42 PM Response to Reply #59 |
371. "Ted is in the hospital and the calculated monstrosity of her statement finally hit home" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bread and Circus
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
63. Yes she did suggest he might be assassinated or something else might |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
64. Disagree. She and her campaign have said everything but this for two months. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mamalone
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:53 AM Response to Reply #64 |
166. Thank you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #64 |
299. And her comment about the Kennedy's being on her mind - causing her to make the statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
66. "If you can't understand that she is a murderous psycho bitch, you're going on IGNORE!!!!111" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gaspee
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:47 PM Response to Reply #66 |
511. I had EarlG on ignore for awhile |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
68. HRC has zero respect for democratic party principles. This was The Straw that broke the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crankychatter
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:02 AM Response to Original message |
69. Obama is not going to try to read Clinton's mind and will give her the benefit of the doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:04 AM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Yup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:05 AM Response to Reply #69 |
73. Obama might, but plenty of people aren't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
72. It's become obvious that she's just waiting for an assassination (either of character or real). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #72 |
113. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #72 |
260. she's priming the pump, using the media to incite the nuts who are on a mission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveAmerica
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
74. "In '68 RFK's primary went to June" No need at all to mention the word assassination - agree? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #74 |
389. So, you would dismiss the Anniversary of RFK's assassination because it affects Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
75. It was also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:15 AM Response to Reply #75 |
96. I think the timing has a great deal to do with the media hoopla over this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:05 AM Response to Original message |
76. Good business decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Midlodemocrat
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
79. Of course that was her intention. To think otherwise is simply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
81. How much benefit of the doubt does this woman deserve, before it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:11 AM Response to Reply #81 |
87. It is amazing the number of crazy things she can get away with - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #87 |
179. It's a five centuury old double standard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #87 |
215. Or says the incorrect numbers of States |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #215 |
406. Incorrect # of states vs. assassination? O-Kay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 07:06 PM Response to Reply #406 |
431. I am still seeing references to him being stupid and that he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:07 AM Response to Original message |
82. Had this been the first time she made the reference in answer to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
85. The other alternative is she is insulting our intelligence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #85 |
433. And, just like oil, the price of gaffe is going up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mconvente
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:12 AM Response to Original message |
88. Yeah, but the 1968 primary started in May |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:15 AM Response to Reply #88 |
97. I thought it was late March? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #88 |
101. Also, her husband had basically won the primary by April. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:17 AM Original message |
Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #88 |
220. That's why I thought her "historical" justification didn't ring true at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
89. With all due respect, if the positions were reversed and Obama made the same reference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner
ADMIN ![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:19 AM Response to Reply #89 |
106. If you're trying to claim that I'm a Clinton supporter, just come out and say it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
foo_bar
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:29 AM Response to Reply #106 |
124. are you a Clinton supporter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:47 AM Response to Reply #124 |
157. You're a brave foo. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner
ADMIN ![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #124 |
176. I think it is obvious that ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #176 |
207. Skinnergate!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #207 |
449. You're a funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #176 |
209. I'm really getting tired of worrying about a few wanna be victims' feelings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #176 |
390. Are you a clinton supporter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:31 AM Response to Reply #106 |
126. I think it is fair for Obama's supporters to be upset about Hillary's "gaffe" - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:02 PM Response to Reply #126 |
466. They can dish the shit but they can't take |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mamalone
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
90. Respectfully.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celebration
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:15 AM Response to Reply #90 |
195. yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mamalone
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #195 |
218. friggin' weird? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #90 |
236. That's where I'm at too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:14 AM Response to Original message |
91. Yesterday, when I watched the video, I also thought that the pause after the statement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:29 PM Response to Reply #91 |
421. Maybe she paused because she REALIZED she'd used the word "asassination"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pathwalker
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
93. At least it got McCain's medical records off the news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
95. Thank you Skinner- the vitrol on the board has reached new absurd hieghts today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
102. Excellent and OBJECTIVE political analysis, Skinner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irishonly
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
103. I Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
104. The fact remains that she is clutching at straws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
108. Skinner, even if it was just a gaffe, it was really, really insensitive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner
ADMIN ![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #108 |
112. You are correct. It was extremely insensitive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #112 |
304. Wish I read this before I commented. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gal
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
111. I think it's important to note though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
114. Sometimes intent is less the point than result. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
charlie
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
115. She's not unaware that it's a tetchy subject |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UndertheOcean
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:24 AM Response to Original message |
116. Mr. Obama has class , he will not push this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genna
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
118. She had me at hard working, uh, white people. She's been melting down steadily since |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
119. Hooray For Some Sanity Brought Into The Discussion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raejeanowl
![]() |
Mon May-26-08 12:23 AM Response to Reply #119 |
575. Hi, OMC! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaulaFarrell
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
121. You posted about the 'bitter' comments saying people should understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:33 AM Response to Reply #121 |
129. 'It seems you are more willing to let Hillary off the hook' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaulaFarrell
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:42 AM Original message |
do you always overreact this much? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:43 AM Response to Original message |
148. ME overreact? Hahahahahahahahahahaahahah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TZ
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:34 AM Response to Reply #121 |
131. Objective analysis is not "letting someone off the hook" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaulaFarrell
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:46 AM Response to Reply #131 |
154. you mean the one he posted while I was reading all the responses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner
ADMIN ![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:50 AM Response to Reply #121 |
160. With all due respect... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TBF
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #160 |
167. OK, I did not see that. Thank you for explaining. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PaulaFarrell
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:59 AM Response to Reply #160 |
173. I appreciate that you try to be fair |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FourScore
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:14 PM Response to Reply #160 |
323. I appreciate your insight Skinner! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 07:42 AM Response to Reply #160 |
582. I certainly do not envy the job you have Skinner... you defend both candidates quite well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
132. I can't buy this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:35 AM Response to Original message |
134. Sure she misspoke. But then again exactly why is she still in the race? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quark219
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
138. Open and Shut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
140. Can't agree with you Skinner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:06 AM Response to Reply #140 |
184. She could have brought up Ted's vanity run to the floor in '80. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
141. Ooooh, there will be demands that you be tombstoned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doublethink
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
142. Calling you out on this Skinner ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
undeterred
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
143. Brilliant people do not have speech mishaps and accidents. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kid a
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
146. should have stopped you title @ gaffe...the rest is all interpretation and debatable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner
ADMIN ![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:56 AM Response to Reply #146 |
171. Of course it's all interpretation and debateable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
147. It doesnt matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
153. Skinner, I've got to disagree with you on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:11 AM Response to Reply #153 |
192. I've gotta disagree with you on one point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #192 |
201. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:46 AM Response to Original message |
155. No matter how it gets "played", people WILL remember |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
156. I agree Skinner. I was writing a post on another thread when you posted this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherina
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #156 |
271. You have a very admirable grasp on what's going on. I wish I could recommend n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
159. It doesn't matter to me what she meant. What matters is the reckless |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:53 AM Response to Reply #159 |
163. I don't think she was remotely thinking about Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #163 |
205. She was asked why she was not dropping out. Who was she thinking about then? Sponge Bob? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #159 |
198. Nicely worded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kahuna
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #198 |
269. That is definately one sweet looking pup. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slinkerwink
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:52 AM Response to Original message |
162. It's not even the right historical reference to make. It's never okay to cite an assassination as a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
judy
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
164. Thank you Skinner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
165. With all due respect, I have to draw the line here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skrelnick
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
168. But the 1968 primary didn't begin until mid-March |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iconicgnom
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
170. Obama's campaign has been, as always, classy in its response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WA98296
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:57 AM Response to Original message |
172. Well, I guess it's YOUR board. So you must be right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #172 |
280. Sweet!! Rudeness!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:01 AM Response to Original message |
174. Nice try, but it won't fly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WA98070
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
177. How can you say it was a mistake when it was the third time? She does know what she said .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptJasHook
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
180. I appreciate the call for reason, Skinner, but in the meantime |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #180 |
259. Now you want to call us dogs? Have you, at long last, no shame? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptJasHook
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #259 |
270. LOL. You just called me a Pig? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #270 |
273. A stinky pig. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptJasHook
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #273 |
289. A mangy dog? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #289 |
293. A stinky fat pig. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptJasHook
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #293 |
300. Now I am really LMAO you are actually serious... I hope, for your sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #300 |
305. A stinky fat pig with a curly tail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
181. Having checked out a few things I'm ready to give my formal reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lilyannerose
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
182. No, Thank You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
happycozy
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
183. Some things are off limits... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
187. They have been PUBLICLY opining that "SOMETHING COULD HAPPEN TO OBAMA" for months |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 08:08 AM Response to Reply #187 |
541. Oodbegate? OverObama'sdeadbodygate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bbgrunt
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:09 AM Original message |
I have a hard time calling it a gaff right after |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
188. I don't know if it's been mentioned here yet, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
189. No more passes for her. This is at least the 3rd time she's raised this spector. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hutzpa
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
190. There is a saying, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleBlue
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
191. She's either mentally ill or she meant it., since she's done it before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RazBerryBeret
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
193. THIS is all I'm sayin': |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phrigndumass
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:13 AM Response to Original message |
194. Thank you for posting this ... it goes well with your "bittergate" post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LulaMay
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:17 AM Response to Original message |
197. Skinner; Please see my post here. This board should not be allowing this slander to be posted! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #197 |
200. good luck with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QueenOfCalifornia
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:22 AM Response to Reply #197 |
203. Welcome to my Ignore list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #203 |
212. who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:45 AM Response to Reply #203 |
221. What, are people supposed to be devastated because you're ignoring them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sniffa
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #197 |
219. As usual, you add so much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:46 AM Response to Reply #197 |
223. Why not have him come over and clean the garage as well? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #223 |
272. and the usual suspects |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #272 |
377. As indicated, I'm all I think I am inasmuch as I am the King of Elves and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #197 |
235. wow are you actually using this thread to promote you own inane rantings? Pick up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AuntPatsy
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #197 |
257. It will not stop you know, not until the real race begins but I don't see anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
199. Job aspirant A tells coworkers that her odds for promotion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
202. 3 x is not a gaffe; just like Bosnia mentioned 3 x is not a gaffe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thewiseguy
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
204. How was it a gaffe when she had made those comments before? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
206. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #206 |
307. I think your pink buds need hydrogen oxide man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #307 |
368. What's hydrogen oxide? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #368 |
567. just water, sorry, just me trying to be light on this heavy thread and obviously not succeeding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
208. Her gaffe came so close to Huckabee's horrid comments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jkoehler
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
210. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quark219
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:31 AM Response to Original message |
211. CLINTON CAMPAIGN RELEASES NEW STATEMENT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:46 AM Response to Reply #211 |
222. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davsand
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
213. This was one of those moments that make campaigns gasp when they happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
214. Good, worthwhile thread. Good discourse. I myself feel that context |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:38 AM Response to Original message |
217. Multiple references by Hillary to the 1968 assassination prohibits this from being a gaffe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ericgtr
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
227. How this can be interpreted any other way than "hey.. he could get assassinated, then what?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jersey Devil
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
228. Your comment is similar to Josh Orton's at MyDD, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michaz
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
229. Y know what? She said it. Not once but more than once. Sorry if it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
230. I agree about the intent but disagree with your framing of the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
231. I disagree. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Willo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
232. Thanks for offering your opinion but I'm done buying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
237. When i got my newspaper off the front porch this morning this story was on the front page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
238. Skinner, this is similar to her 'sniper fire' comments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papapi
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
239. Bobby Kennedy DIED campaigning for the nomination. Don't you GET IT? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #239 |
242. Nonsense. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
240. I disagree with the part that excuses this as just a gaff. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sam Ervin jret
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
241. Well, I have learned a lot. Mostly I know I'd sooner be a ref. at WWE Smack Down than a moderator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robyn66
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
243. I am sure she doesn't wish Obama ill but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RiverStone
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
244. Hillary should not play in lightning storms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrank
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
245. This would have been a simple gaffe if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rowdyboy
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:30 PM Original message |
My partner and I heard the remarks and came to totally different conclusions.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
246. Skinner I urge you to do more research on the matter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
247. Why do you bother? You should rename DU "Welcome to ignore" Underground. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #247 |
252. Yes, coming here now is like being magically transported to FR in the fall of 1998. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugin
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #252 |
266. I concur. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Debi
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #252 |
276. I wonder where we got the idea to call her Hillary instead of Senator Clinton.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ForeignSpectator
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #276 |
348. Ouch, touché! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #276 |
384. Check the spelling: Hilliary. Again, Hilliary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #276 |
404. No kidding! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #404 |
444. Her name is not Hilliary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #444 |
484. I don't understand your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 09:49 PM Response to Reply #484 |
487. The post in question referred to her as HilLIARy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #487 |
560. Okay. I've never seen that before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beac
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 10:06 PM Response to Reply #404 |
492. Seriously, why not use a heart to dot the "i" while she was at it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 08:22 AM Response to Reply #276 |
543. It's an error of judgement on their part, imo. In many contexts, the familiarity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #252 |
339. Yep. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snarkturian Clone
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 07:27 AM Response to Reply #247 |
578. "Welcome to Ignore Underground" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
248. I'm sorry, but she's wanting it both ways.. a gaffe is an accidental utterance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
250. I don't think he should push it. He should rise above it because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
251. Thanks for a touch of sanity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftrightwingnut
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
254. I am with you on this one, Skinner. Why the hysteria now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
256. Skinner, I respect your point of view and appreciate your call for calm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
258. I do not believe that Senator Clinton's intentions are the issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
261. How dare you try to excuse the unexcusable. If people keep their word, you are now on at least 10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sundancekid
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
262. cowpie is still cowpie - gaffe my a$$ :: it's repeated talking points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibraLiz1973
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #262 |
285. His "apologist" take??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:14 PM Response to Original message |
267. It's a gaffe in the sense that she unintentionally told the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uppityperson
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
279. I've stayed of of this so far, but that was my take on it also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:35 PM Response to Original message |
281. The problem is her intention is a very small part of the whole context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #281 |
288. Hasn't Terry McCauliffe been pushing the "we're waiting in case something terrible happens" meme? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #288 |
302. "Anything can happen!' Yep. In fact, the last time I managed to watch him, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
284. "I think Senator Clinton probably realized immediately..." This was the third time she said this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RTBerry
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
286. Interested in a little experiment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
287. Her comparison was still false and misleading. Regardless of the gaffe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SaveOurDemocracy
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
292. Enjoying your creation, Stanley .... errrrr .... Skinner?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comradebillyboy
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #292 |
568. Ouch that hurts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoonerPride
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
294. I disagree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
295. I believe she was signalling the super delegates that she is the safer choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barrymores Ghost
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #295 |
308. BINGO!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:47 PM Response to Original message |
297. "Clinton's gaffe"? There was no gaffe. Only manufactured outrage by the Followers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaptJasHook
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #297 |
301. And you love to swim in the sewage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimGinPA
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #297 |
315. You Are Proof Clinton Supporters Are Given Too Much Latitude Here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #315 |
317. "The race can last into June" doesn't mean "She wants BO killed" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimGinPA
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #317 |
320. Find A Post Where I've Said That & I'll Start A Thread Denying You Are A Racist Slug... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #320 |
324. Look out the window, Your whaaaaaaambulance will be pulling up soon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimGinPA
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #324 |
332. Typical - Pathetic Attempt To Deflect Fault |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #332 |
336. Citing an example of the race lasting til June doesn't equal "I want BO killed!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JimGinPA
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #317 |
321. Dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Tue May-27-08 07:19 AM Response to Reply #317 |
577. Only those wanting to trash HIllary believe/believed that sillyness. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #297 |
329. My outrage is NOT manufactured. It is very real. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #329 |
334. You've been played into a rage by profession manipulators. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalLovinLug
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #334 |
443. Strawman alert! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barrymores Ghost
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:57 PM Response to Original message |
306. Disagree, Skinner. Her historical rationalization doesn't add up AT ALL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zabet
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
311. Nice try but, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
312. I don't think it's at all clear what her intent has been for citing this numerous times |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shomino
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
314. There is no way Obama himself is going to push this topic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ekwhite
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
316. Sorry, Skinner, but it is not obvious that it was a gaffe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
318. Thank you for this line. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nickster
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:09 PM Response to Original message |
319. Her comment makes no sense historically, she took it out of context at the very least. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
322. 100% agree. I don't like Sen. Clinton. And I think she is harming the party, but this was a gaffe, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #322 |
330. 3 times does not make a "gaffe" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #330 |
337. if this was said as part of some cold calculation - then certainly she would be calculated enough to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skooooo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #337 |
342. Ok, then that makes her just plain dumb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Douglas Carpenter
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #342 |
345. as someone said " if you are arguing stupid versus evil - you have already lost" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
325. I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt even though many Clinton supporters... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
331. Then why didn't she just say that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
335. Since this has been broadcast worldwide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zavulon
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
340. Obviously, her comments do not indicate any sort of secret plan. However, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
341. Three brief observations (one for Skinner, one on Clinton, one on Obama) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ForeignSpectator
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #341 |
351. I agree with your post but are you sure about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:14 PM Response to Reply #351 |
385. 90% of 90 is 81. Or, 100 x 0.9 x0.9 = 81. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalcommontater
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
343. Hi, thanks for the thoughtful analysis... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
344. Why bring up the word "assassination" at all? That was Keith O point and I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 08:51 AM Response to Reply #344 |
547. You'd think in such a contest as this, with any eminently populist (aka democratic) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
346. K & R. And thank you. I especially agree with what you said here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #346 |
352. That comment was particularly superficial n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RainDog
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
347. context matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intaglio
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
349. It was a gaffe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #349 |
355. It was a talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiet.american
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
350. I don't want four more years of constant "misspeak" and non-apologies.nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
353. Know what? If it keeps her from driving her train wreck of a campaign all the way to the convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 07:23 PM Response to Reply #353 |
436. Spoken like a politician. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:15 PM Response to Original message |
354. it is especially untimley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:17 PM Response to Original message |
357. Please REC THIS THREAD if you agree with Skinner. This should be at the top of the Greatest page. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mkultra
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 09:33 AM Response to Reply #357 |
554. translation= please rec if you wanna kiss admin but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
358. Great post except Obama supporters are looking to play the race card at every turn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zippy890
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
363. Thanks Skinner. I really appreciate your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
martymar64
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
364. Nonetheless, she just assassinated her chances at the WH for good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevinmc
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:26 PM Response to Original message |
365. It's Obvious she cannot win mathematically.... she can win if Obama is assassinated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnionPatch
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
367. Thank you for the sanity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
369. I agree with you, Skinner, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #369 |
388. I think you've got it wrong... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:06 PM Response to Reply #388 |
415. You could be right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #415 |
427. If there is one thing that did in the Kennedys... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
372. Post #178 destroys this laughable argument. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
374. Only someone who thinks a woman candidate has no right to compare HERSELF to a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Steerpike_Denver
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 12:49 AM Response to Reply #374 |
516. She wasn't comparing HERSELF to RFK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Sun May-25-08 06:55 AM Response to Reply #516 |
534. Oh yes she was. The fact that you don't get it shows how well the bullshit has been spread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
376. Sorry, I DISAGREE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Garbo 2004
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
379. But there's no valid comparison of '68 primary timeline and process to 2008. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
all.of.me
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
383. That is exactly how I feel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Why Syzygy
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
386. It wasn't the first time she said it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K8-EEE
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
387. IMO the RFK remark was just the craziest part of a big bucket o' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
392. Your statement makes sense to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tommy_Carcetti
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
395. My faith in this website is restored. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #395 |
402. Well, let's not get carried away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chascarrillo
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:14 PM Response to Original message |
396. Would you allow posters here to make the same comments about another poster? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
398. Perhaps it is obvious what her intent was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Writer
![]() |
Sat May-24-08 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
399. Dear Brave Administrator, |