Was Hillary insinuating something with her reference to the assassination of RFK?
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:24 PM
Original message
Poll question: Was Hillary insinuating something with her reference to the assassination of RFK?
Ian David
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think there is a middle ground you are missing with your strictly binary poll. n/t
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She was insinuating something before she wasn't insinuating it. n/t
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. She was insinuating part of something, more than nothing?
She was misinsinuating something? She was insinuating some things and not others? But that would still be insinuating something. In the word of Mayor Richard Daley, senior, of Chicago: it was 'insinuendo'?
Saturday
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do you really think the BO supporter tizzy mob will vote 'no'? LOL nt
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Poll: How often will you use the word "tizzy?"
1 kabillion times? 2 kabillion times? A kabillion kabillion times?
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. My country tizzy thee?
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Sweet land of tizzythee.
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. Lame word is lame. n/t
Writer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
I'm sorry but no no no no no. But how else do you expect this poll to end up in here?
Quixote1818
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think it was a freudian slip. It's not something she wanted to say but it accidentally came out
Edited on Fri May-23-08 04:34 PM by Quixote1818
So yes, in her heart she meant it.
glowing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. We've been all thinking about it.. Its come up in conversations multiple
times with multiple people.. Hell even Obama knows the possibility is real and has Secret Service protecting him and his family as he travels (which I must say is absolutely brilliant in keeping Security costs to a minimum for his campaign.. do you know how much a security detail would cost for some of these rallys he's been to.) Hillary wants to finish.. if something happens to Obama, she will come swooping in with the delegate count to save the day.
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Primary in California in June, 68 made a difference in delegates
The Rest of the Primaries in June, 2008 make no difference in the race because it is over.
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Yup and this year here in CA we had our primary
in Feb so her using that as as excuse for staying in is just bull-crap.
WA98296
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Of course. It was not a meaningless phrase. As for what, exactly, she was insinuating...
...well, we can discuss that at length.
populistdriven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. She was blowing the dogwhistle to actvate all her rabid supporters to code red
greguganus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. That's what scares me! n/t
WA98296
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
apocalypsehow
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. She damn sure wasn't just whistlin' Dixie - though she's done that before, too. n/t.
Bluerthanblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. why utter it if not to
make people think about it? :shrug: She's a sad woman.
WA98070
(782 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. I should have voted "NO", because she wasn't insinuating anything. She was hoping for it.
Exultant Democracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Either way she fails the Thomas Becket test on this one. Careless words have gotten people killed.
Catchawave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. If you saw the interview video, it's definitely a "no".....
though her statement was taken out of context on all the news bunny channels, it's HYSTERIA. Sigh. This is looking worse for the Obama campaign and their stable of crybabies everyday. You guys want to win in November, don't you? Grow a pair....:banghead:
suston96
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. What she "insinuated" was that RFK was on his way to the nomination in June 1968 and....
...all of a sudden in he was tragically stopped in his quest by an assassin's bullet. No insinuation. Statement of historical fact. The insinuations are in the media and on rabid partisan forum boards made by people who have difficulty with reading and or audiovisual comprehension.
LoZoccolo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Fri May-23-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. What does that have to do with why she's still running? n/t
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.