|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:26 PM Original message |
Florida would give its 27 electoral votes to Hillary, while Obama loses by 10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. Deleted message |
kid a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. blah blah blah...........(meaningless drivel at this point) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. With the Clintons and hacks trashing Obama to Floridians, I'm not surprised. Aren't you really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. It is Obama that wants to disenfranchise Florida voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kid a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. And Hillary want to dienfranchise voters in MI - be honest dude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #7 |
79. you need to check the definition of disenfranchise... cause i dont think it means what you think it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmudem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. They both agreed that Florida would not count. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wileedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. She opposed a re-vote a couple of weeks ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
26. Bitterly wrong much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
30. You failed Reading Comprehension, didn't you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HCE SuiGeneris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
60. Why didn't Hillary oppose the "disenfranchisement" before she "disenfranchised" them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #5 |
73. "It's clear, this election they're having is not going to count for anything" - HRC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #5 |
105. No, it's the Florida Democratic Party that wants to disenfranchise Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #5 |
152. And you don't provide any evidence to back up that assertion because...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MessiahRp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
140. Yep that's my thought on this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Changenow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
4. If the election were held today or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
6. more irrelevent bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Losing Florida is irrelevant? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Was there a Florida primary this year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #15 |
77. What does the (non) primary have to do with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #77 |
93. I was responding to the OP who was conflating the 2000 presidential election and the 2008 Democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #8 |
17. the poll is irrelvent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #17 |
86. So, this poll is irrelevant, too, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #86 |
114. Polls in states where nobody campaigned are worthless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
10. uh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #10 |
117. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:32 PM Response to Reply #117 |
131. Yeah, it's interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
11. Deleted message |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Obama does need either Ohio or Florida. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
18. guess we'll find out, won't we. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:38 PM Original message |
Whatever troll. Obama doesn't need those Diebold States. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
31. Don't forget about North Carolina and Virginia! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #31 |
42. South Carolina and Mississippi were HUGE for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #31 |
94. Don't forget about Kentucky! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
izquierdista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #13 |
24. Math lessons from Hillary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Did you happen to read any of the FEC report threads late last night/early this morning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
9119495 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #13 |
100. Kerry lost Iowa and New Mexico |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:23 PM Response to Reply #13 |
158. But...but...but ... he'll turn Virginia BLUE!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
99. was that sarcasm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
14. He has some work to do in FL. That's why he's there. How hilly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. 10% is virtually impossible to make up at this point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. that's completely absurd, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
movonne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. Why are you still arguing about hillary ... it is over even if you and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ej510 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. You're wrong Cali! Hillary matches up with McCain well! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pdx_prog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
75. Al Gore matches up to him good as well! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bensthename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
19. Why have elections at all, just sit in front of supers and let them determine who is more electable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dionysus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
21. if you think a poll predicts the future i have some cheap real estate for ya... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
23. The nominating process is essentially over: he won, she lost. Get over it. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. It's not over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #27 |
46. It is over. Face it. Over. Over. Over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #27 |
151. Um...Obama has the delegates, the votes and the supers...That is known as GAME OVER. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
25. Florida is important but it's NOT THE WHOLE ELECTION ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:41 PM Response to Reply #25 |
28. If Gore or Kerry would Florida, they would have won the election. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #28 |
67. If Gore had won TENNESSEE he wouldn't have needed Florida! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #67 |
153. Or New Hampshire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lsusteel (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
33. See link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:44 PM Original message |
Obama is putting states with 5 electoral votes in play like New Mexico. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lsusteel (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
44. What's your point? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #44 |
57. My point is that Obama doesn't win with just IA, New Mexico and Colorado. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lsusteel (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. Uh, yes he does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. You are right. My bad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lsusteel (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #69 |
89. Here are some scenarios excluding Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nemo137 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #69 |
156. Two of which went Gore in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #57 |
125. Like California? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pdx_prog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
80. Explain your reasoning.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #80 |
118. Explain my reasoning of what? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
34. Does anyone else notice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
35. This is all you have anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
36. He'll win Florida; he's only just started campaigning there. Oh, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. No, he won't win Florida. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Sure he will. He's only ten down, and that's including: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #45 |
51. Those are an awful lot of assumptions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. "Those are an awful lost of assumptions." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #51 |
56. Assuming in politics that there are no factors at play but the poll numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
reflection (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. Nice. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carrieyazel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:59 PM Response to Reply #45 |
161. No, Florida's out of play for Barack. There's no way he could win it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pdx_prog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
83. Wow....I wasn't aware that you spoke for the state of Florida..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #39 |
129. That's what EVERY state said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kool Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
147. I guess there is just no arguing with you, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #39 |
154. That says everything about your comittment to the Democratic party's nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stahbrett (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
37. Bill Clinton was in 3rd place in the polls in June of 1992 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #37 |
52. Shhhh! The polls that are coming out right this second are gospel. GOSPEL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
38. Six months. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Just as useless as those polls in May 2004 that said Bush would win Florida and Ohio right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #43 |
48. Yes. Exactly as useless. Kerry could have won both or either if he had run a competent campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. Hey, stay on track here. Are you trying to deny that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. It is irrelevant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Yes, there are now two candidates, and Hillary's popularity has never increased |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. It tells me that Hillary's ceiling is just below Obama's floor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #61 |
68. Bingo! You're in touch with reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #61 |
76. It tells you nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #76 |
82. No, it tells me that she's capped her support. She hasn't been able to budge her numbers since Q4 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. Her absolute ceiling is winning Florida and Ohio. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #87 |
91. psssst: We're not in the General Election! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #87 |
98. "Her ceiling is higher than Obama's." Completely ridiculous. Obama has a better shot at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #98 |
104. Hillary has a better shot in MO, FL, OH, WV and KY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #104 |
108. DIdi it ever occur to you that Obama would have a BETTER shot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #108 |
111. So you are saying Hillary would win by more than 6% in Florida if the party rallied around her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. If Hillary wants to be President of FL, sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #104 |
109. "Can we stop saying that any Democrat has a chance of winning NC, VA, ND, TX, NE or MT?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #109 |
113. Congressional races are different than national races. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #113 |
119. Of course they are. And Obama has a strong chance at NC, VA, and ND, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:25 PM Response to Reply #119 |
121. No, he doesn't have a chance in any of those states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #121 |
127. Put forth your proof. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. Go look at their electoral history for starters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #128 |
135. And I'm not doing yours. "Oh, they haven't voted Dem in a while" isn't convincing when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #135 |
138. You can simply look at their electoral history and see that none of them are going to be won |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #138 |
141. And again, "electoral history" is meaningless when Dems haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #141 |
144. So you have no proof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #144 |
145. Note: Opposite of what I said. But if you'd rather stick your head in the sand, or rather play |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #113 |
123. And why do you believe he has no chance there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #104 |
142. What makes you think you know anything about any state west of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kool Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #87 |
155. Actually, there were many questions about Ohio |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #76 |
85. How can you be "electable" if you're not "favorable?" LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Yet Hillary still leads in Florida and Ohio. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. It tells me that you're using an inappropriate measuring stick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. Quit moving the goalposts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. Because he's trailing in Florida while still running against a fellow Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #72 |
74. Hillary is winning by 5 points despite running against a fellow Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #74 |
78. She's losing. Her supporters are therefore more defensive, and more likely to claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:03 PM Response to Reply #78 |
84. You have no proof for that assertion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #84 |
88. And you have no proof of YOUR assertions! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #84 |
90. Oh, not all of them. Just the overwhelming majority of them. You might feel like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:09 PM Response to Reply #90 |
95. You have no proof that the overwhelming majority will vote for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. I demand you hand over your Magic 8-Ball. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:14 PM Response to Reply #95 |
103. "You referring to these people as engaging in a 'temper tantrum...'" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #103 |
107. So you tell me that state polls such as Florida are meaningless 5 months away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #107 |
110. You're the one using GE polls during a primary, dolt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #107 |
115. Nope. I tell you that state polls are meaningless five months away, and then say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #115 |
120. I exposed your double standard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #120 |
122. There's no double standard. Polls of something five months out are worthless. Polls of something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #122 |
124. Polls of something happening today? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:31 PM Response to Reply #124 |
130. Yes. HRC holdout-ism is unraveling today. Do you think that HRC ex-supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. A one day tracking poll isn't indicative of anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #133 |
137. A two-week trend over every day of it is. The mass holdout you're relying on is breaking day by day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:37 PM Response to Reply #137 |
139. Show me the two week trend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #139 |
143. Sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justinaforjustice (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #95 |
164. Slashing and Burning the Facts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:57 PM Response to Reply #66 |
71. Absolutely. If the delegate totals were reversed, Obama supporters would be throwing fits, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #43 |
53. Dumbest. Argument. Ever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
40. Oh yeah... and how did that Oregon squeaker work out for ya, NJ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:45 PM Response to Original message |
41. YAWN. The man has never even campaigned there. This Poll is irrelevant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buck Rabbit (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:22 PM Response to Reply #41 |
116. True, and Hillary has not been vetted anywhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haymakeragain (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
47. Hillary's done, Obama will be the nominee, start helping or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #47 |
102. that's all that matters to O-ists, isn't? who cares if dems lose the GE? at least you beat the bitch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:16 PM Response to Reply #102 |
106. You won't even help us GET to the GE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haymakeragain (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:35 PM Response to Reply #102 |
136. You said "bitch" not me, I said he won and she should quit helping McSame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #102 |
148. Why are you calling your candidate a bitch? Again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:52 PM Response to Reply #102 |
149. Now who's the sexist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my3boyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
49. Meet ignore! I'm so sick of reading your stupid posts that you post only to start shit! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mooney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
63. While you're at it, what are the Lotto numbers for tonight? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
65. Don't preach to us. Go to the Super Delegates with that theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HockeyMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
81. Where are all the HILLARY stickers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
92. The State of Florida rendered its Democratic primary election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneAmerica (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
97. I must admit, NJSecularist makes some good, important points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
101. This is a recording (beep) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yanez Houston Jordan (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
126. OMG! Check out the polling which says Edwards would do better than Obama in Ohio. VOTE EDWARDS!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stop Cornyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:32 PM Response to Original message |
132. We need a special new forum apart from GD-P for these sort of posts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MilesColtrane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
134. If your candidate is more electable, wouldn't she have won the nomination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
haymakeragain (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #134 |
146. Stop saying that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4_Legs_Good (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
150. Glad to see your optimism for our nominee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dcindian (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
157. Step one win your partie's primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #157 |
159. BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GOPBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
160. Is Clinton going to campaign for the Dem nominee, then? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carrieyazel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
162. McCain will easily beat Obama in Florida. It's basically over there for BHO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-21-08 06:17 PM Response to Original message |
163. Who needs FL when you have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:44 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC