Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lemme see if I have the race thing correct

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:02 AM
Original message
Lemme see if I have the race thing correct
According to some, Barack Obama's victories don't count because he got a majority of the black vote.

And this isn't racism HOW?

Last time I checked, a vote was a vote. A black vote counts the same as a white vote, a Mexican vote, a Native American vote, a male vote, a female vote, and an Eskimo vote. How is it NOT racist to discount someone's victories in states like the Carolinas and Mississippi based on the blacks people who voted for him? As if this demographic somehow illegitimizes Obama's victories.

Do people NOT see the disingenuous nature and downright cruelty of such a line of logic?

I say this because I just read that Obama's victories in these states mean little because he had 90% of the black vote. What a vile way of thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Black votes don't count. How could you not know that.
Yeah, this crap makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. You mean they're not three-fifths of a person any more?
You have to remember the Clinton campaign is a little behind the times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. The "race thing" was making AA voters think Clintons were racist/had racist supporters - 90+ whites
would be just as bad - but Hillary refused to play the race card to scare the white population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. actually she had to apologize for her "I do better with working class
whites" remarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellacott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. She also apologized in front of black people for any racist comments
She also apologized to Obama. Kinda wierd apologizing for something you didnt do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemGa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. No, she didn't apologize for any "racist comments"
Because it never happened.

"Her biggest apology came in response to a question about comments by her husband, Bill Clinton, after the South Carolina primary, which Obama won handily. Bill Clinton said Jesse Jackson also won South Carolina when he ran for president in 1984 and 1988, a comment many viewed as belittling Obama's success.

"I want to put that in context. You know I am sorry if anyone was offended. It was certainly not meant in any way to be offensive," Hillary Clinton said. "We can be proud of both Jesse Jackson and Senator Obama."

"Anyone who has followed my husband's public life or my public life know very well where we have stood and what we have stood for and who we have stood with," she said, acknowledging that whoever wins the nomination will have to heal the wounds of a bruising, historic contest.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/03/12/2008-03-12_hillary_clinton_apologizes_to_black_vote.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. That's simply flat out FALSE
Hillary repeatedly played the race card. Over and over. Including her remarks about how Obama couldn't win hardworking WHITE American voters. You don't have anything like that to quote from Obama. Hillypoo has used gender and race to further her ends. That's one reason she's lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. is "ignored" STILL trying to defend the racial divisiness intentionally used?
people keep earning their way BACK on to my ignore list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. no.
she's accusing Obama of having purposely played on black fears to get them to vote against hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. ahhh. well, that's not much better, eh?
either way its delusional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. "I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on."
How's that for diminishing the AA vote?

How about her surrogate Paul Begala?

"We can't win with eggheads and African Americans."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SwampG8r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. on the bizzaro planet maybe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. candidates do have demographic stats to work with, HOWEVER, to use it as a
rallying point is whipping up the racist support intentionally.

when the demographics become your policy points, its a sad day for the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. If the Republicans had their way, blacks wouldn't vote.
They do everything in their power to keep blacks from voting. So, this kind of talk is pretty Republican if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, demographics based on race turnout are used all the time...
...there is nothing racist about such reporting.

The primary wins by Obama because of high black voter turnout in permanently red states are meaningless for the general election.

Those are statistical facts. Repeat: not racist. Just as the announced female turnouts are not sexist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. see my post #3. thanks.
plomk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. UGH! We're not talking about the General Election!
Edited on Mon May-19-08 10:19 AM by msallied
We're TALKING about the process of selecting a Democrat to run in the GE! We're talking about Democratic voters who turn out to vote in said selection process and the diminishing of the value of African American Democratic voters by Clinton supporters! Just because Mississippi at large will go red doesn't mean that the Democrats of Mississippi have less of a say in the choice of their candidate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. She's leading in the popular vote
Counting MI and FL, discounting caucus outcomes, and considering that each AA vote is 3/5 of a person.

Old school, baby! Before that pesky amendment.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:17 AM
Original message
Oh dammit! I forgot about the 3/5 thing. That explains it. LMAO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papapi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. And Hillary says it's the MAP not the MATH! Phooey!!!
How about simple arithmetic. Can we use THAT Hillrot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. Who ever said they don't count?
I wish everybody would stop with the "xxxx doesn't count" nonsense. Nobody's claiming it, but people keep setting it up as a strawman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I see it here plenty of times on DU by certain folk.
The diminishing of the importance or relevancy of the AA vote is blatant and disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. well, its hypocritical, since the Clintons bragged about securing the AA vote when Bill was elected
but in other news, apparently, Hillary is sounding more like a unity candidate today in Kentucky, which is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Good. Perhaps it's not too late to repair the damage that's been done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. that's when it was dem vs rep, not white dem vs black dem. you do see the difference, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #13
22. that would be a wide breath of your ilk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Cool!
I have an ilk?

But back to the question at hand, I've never seen anyone say black votes don't count - or shouldn't count. Discussing the realities of the primaries doesn't mean something "doesn't count".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. the contention from either side is
Edited on Mon May-19-08 09:29 PM by mkultra
that older women/feminists and blacks don't really count as they are identity voting. Thus meaning they are locked up and only the indies "matter"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. And apparently white votes for Obama in Colorado, where he won
over Clinton 2 to 1. In a sea of faces at our caucus site, I saw 2, count them, 2 African Americans. I'm proud to say that they were both in my precinct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. I hear ya... I live in Washington
that went largely for Obama. There were very few blacks at my caucus or at the county convention. Actually zero in my precinct or the two other precincts we shared a room with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. Yeah, but those were elitist, ...
latte-drinking, birkenstock-wearing white votes.

Not yer shoulder-to-the-wheel, nose-to-the-grindstone, salt-of-the-earth, hard-working white votes.

:rofl:

So they don't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Well, I did take my latte to the caucus but my Birks were at home.
Everyone else, however, proudly wore their birks with their ski socks while drinking DOUBLE lattes. I felt very lowly with my single latte and snow boots. :(

I got over it, though, as I went right out and bought a Prius. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
31. uh, nobody said they don't count, but if 90% of whites went for clinton, well, you can be sure the r
racism charges would be flying. witness what happened in WV; clinton won most of the whites (although nowhere near 90%) and there were several days solid here of racism accusations against white west virginians. you do the math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dugggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
33. Would it be racist if 95% of whites voted for a white candidate
running against a Non-white candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-19-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Possibly
If it's a white Republican and 95% of the white people in the district are Republican, then no. But I would say that in most cases, a margin that high among white voters would suggest a reluctance to vote for a non-white candidate, particularly if there is a history of racism in that area. Black voters have a long history of voting for white candidates in presidential elections, so I don't think you can make the case that they are voting for Obama because they are uncomfortable voting for white people. They are voting for Obama because he is the first African American with a real chance to become president, and they are proud of him. I don't see how you call that racism. I don't think women who vote for Hillary because she's a woman are sexist either, but I think men who vote against her specifically because of her gender are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC