Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am sick of spin - - Lets talk turkey....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
canadian_is_cold Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:13 AM
Original message
I am sick of spin - - Lets talk turkey....
There is still alot of venom being spat around the DU these days between the HillLovers and the ObamaFans. Why? Isn't it almost time for you Dems to get together and start focusing on the real enemy. Good ole McSame?

I believe Hillary Clinton has ran a good race, she competed fiercely. She tried her best. But she simply cannot win. Obama will be the nominee plain and simple. What I find surprising is how many Clinton supporters are still suffering the mass delusion that somehow this is a competitive campaign. when it is clearly not, so why do Hills supporters seem so convinced she is still in the game?

It has been a close race. But it is not close enough anymore to offer Clinton a viable path to victory.

Facts:

Obama has won 32 contests so far

Clinton has won 16

Obama has a pledged delegate count of 1599

Clinton has 1446

Obama has the support of 287 Super Delegates

Clinton has 273

Obama also leads in the popular vote with a total of 16,438,697 right now

Clinton sits at 15,734,865

the only number that shows Clinton with a lead of any kind is if FL and MI were counted as is, allowing no votes at all for Obama in MI. If that were the decision the numbers would be:

16,680,827 for Obama

16,710,298 for Clinton

In that completely unlikely scenario Clinton would gain a tiny lead of 29,471. However I should note, Obama was not on the ballot in MI, although there were 238,168 votes for "uncommitted" if those were to be considered votes for Obama, he would be ahead again by 208,697.

There are 5 contests left

Clinton is favoured to win 2

Kentucky with 51 delegates total
Puerto Rico with 55 delegates total

Obama will probably take the other 3

Oregon with 52 delegates total
Montana with 16 delegates total
South Dakota with 15 delegates total

They will most likely split the remaining delegates each ending up with around 90 more elected delegates.

Obama has also been enjoying a steady flow of superdelegate endorsements (over 25 in one week) while in the same span of time Clinton has only gained 1.

Obama is 139 delegates away from securing the nomination.
Clinton is 306 delegates away

***Hillary supporters this question is for you. Point out 1 legitimate way your candidate will achieve a actual win this contest. btw (Going to the convention and trying to force the party to ignore the will of the American people does not count as a 'legitimate' win.)***
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. STEAL what is rightfully HERS eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. I disagree
that the superdelegates deciding to support Clinton is not a legitimate win. Obama fans want to pretend there's some rule that the supers must support the pledged delegate leader, but that's just a talking point - it's not based on truth at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadian_is_cold Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I never suggested that supers supporting her would not be legitimate
I noted that they are not supporting her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well what would make it illegitimate?
Them changing their minds? I just don't see a way that she DOES win that would be illegitimate. IF the delegates vote for her, it's legitimate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canadian_is_cold Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. I think you must have misunderstood. My question
I was not referring to the will of the supers per say. I was referring to the new Hillary campaign spin that the rules need to be changed now, that there are actually more delegates needed than 2,025 that the will of the people should not be as much of a consideration as who won the bigger states. That the only focus of the party should be that she is a stronger candidate, and that MI and FL should be counted as is, even if Obama was not on the ballot in MI. That they will refuse to accept a decision that is anything less than what they are demanding now.

As for the supers, they will probably continue to flock to Obama. Only 1 in a week for Hillary does not bode well for them getting her to her new goalpost of 2210 delegates.

My version of illegitimate is basically changing the rules of the game right before the other team is about to score the winning goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not a rule - just the basis of democracy
The vote of the people should rule. Why else does she keep saying we have to let all the states vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. of course they dont have to
but they also know whats good for the party. so they will go that way. theyd rather project the will of the people being done than their own, trust me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. I thought you already conceded the nomination. Did you flip flop? The only
problem with the fantasy that all the supers suddenly change direction is that they are already consistently going Obama's direction.

What event do you foresee that would change the direction the supers are going?

When Obama wins a majority of the pledged delegates on May 20th, it will only further the movement of super delegates toward Obama.

Do you believe that Edwards can get his 19 pledged delegates to back his endorsement up? My bet is he can. It looks more and more likely that Obama will cross the 2024 mark by June 3rd, when the voters of SD and MT close the deal for Obama on the nomination.

After that, the supers will pile onto the presumed nominee, making the numbers quite lop sided. And as you already so astutely pointed out, Obama is the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. with Edwards pledged delegates it will be over in one week
he will have 2025 by wednesday next week

its over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. but he needs 2995 now.

:rofl:

just a little bar raising humour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wvbygod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Because Hillary is close to 50%
Combine that with the hatred shown against Hillary supporters because they
refuse to give up early and the turkey is still cooking. The assumption that
we that vote for Hillary are somehow racist really adds to the stuffing too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I don't believe Hillary supporters are racist.
Edited on Thu May-15-08 12:32 AM by Brundle_Fly
and if she were the nominee I would expect everyone to vote for her.

Fact is, if there had been no Obama, she would have won handily, but his campaign was excellent and they didn't see it coming.

He also developed and taught the democrats how to use the internet as a social media tool rather than an extension of broadcasting the same things television shows do... if anything the 2004 Dean campaign and the 2008 Obama campaign have changed the way the media can be used to win elections.

I'll see you on twitter @brundle_fly :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. been here for only a week and sure have a big chip on your shoulder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wvbygod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. because I have never seen such hate by democrats against democrats
The attacks against my heritage has not helped either. My remarks have
not even come close to the bigotry and hatred of WV democrats that I have
seen here in the last week. Perhaps they could use some of your concern too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. now your lecturing too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. SD usurpation or illegitimately seating FL and MI will assure a loss in November
Edited on Thu May-15-08 12:39 AM by crankychatter
that's that

there is no "out of here"

register voters and hope the preponderance of these supposed Clinton supporters (GOP assholes) online are NOT representative of the general public.

edit to add... the war profiteer owned cnn is obviously in the bag for Clinton... that's why they keep MAKING ISSUES where none really exist

these fuckers have unlimited resources

NOT.THIS.TIME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. OK! Let's!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. gobble gobble
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blitzen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. Okay...I have a great recipe for Turkey Tonnato
You poach a turkey breast and make a kind of "faux" Veal Tonnato....Yummy, especially if you can find oversized capers as a garnish.

And, by the way, I totally agree with you--Obama will be and desrves to be the nominee!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC