Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama is the nominee...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:49 PM
Original message
Obama is the nominee...
but the attacks on Clinton have to stop. I'm sick of reading about her future position being a vicious watchdog on the whitehouse lawn, etc. She is a democrat...she is one of us.

And fyi. She has to let her campaign wear down. Hillary Clinton knows she has lost the nomination. Things have to wind down though because there is such a huge divide between the Obama and Clinton camps. This has been a close race and many of her supporters now say that they won't support Obama (and many Obama supporters also won't support her) She has to give here supporters the feeling that she was not kicked out of the race early. At the end of the day, she will let the delegates and popular vote speak to her supporters...she will say that she gave it her all and lost and then she will rally behind Obama...It is also the reason that the superdelegates haven't rushed over to Obama to end this thing. It is part of trying to unite the party back together. She will lose fair and square and then help her supporters to move forward and towards Obama.

That's the truth...

I think that threads which call out Senator Clinton in such demeaning ways must be closed by the mods.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm done
It's over. Sorry if I was bad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. tell her to throw her arms down
meaning guns and knives. AS long as she and her supporters are trying to tear down Obama I will not sit back silently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. that is not happening anymore.
And this primary season hasn't been any worse than any other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Which is why we're still hearing about how Obama can't win, about how rural whites hate him, about
how only Clinton can win the important swing states? She's still campaigning. I appreciate that her attacks have toned down, and the anti-Clinton mood here has toned down, too. But you're not realistically going to see a truce until Clinton stops firing entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. decision
But I think she's campaigning for VP at this point. She'll make her plea, he'll make the decision. He should consider her. I think it would make a ticket we can all eagerly support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. What's this "we" shit?
I dearly hope Obama does NOT choose her as his VP. He'll lose too many votes. Plus he has a wide range of people better suited to accept the job.

One president and two (Clintons) vice presidents will not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. 16 mil
16 million who voted for Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. So you are excluding all of the Dems
that did not vote for Clinton.

That ain't "we".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #32
69. merge/purge
It's his call; merge or purge. Purge might give him the most personal satisfaction at the moment, but ultimately he needs to broaden the base. His current base is too small, and the publication of more inspirational books probably won't help any more than they already have. Personally, I don't much care, but it would be nice to have dems in government in this, of all years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
43. Um, fuck no it isn't. I don't support proven unrepentant liars.
That aside, it's STUPID to consider her - all McLame has to do is play two videos:

Tuzla. Ooops, she's proven a liar.

Endorsing McLame over Obama. Ooops, she's an opportunist for accepting the VP slot.

Never going to happen, thankfully. She's not getting back in the White House. Get used to that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
40. That only proves that some here cannot find the high road with both hands
Which is a pity.

Be the change you'd like to see. Take the high road... it's the adult thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philk17088 Donating Member (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #40
60. High road?
Is losing the GE to assuage Clinton's ego the responsible, adult thing to do?
She should cease and dissist at once and try to make up for her horrendous attacks on Obama,not for a political reward, just because THAT is the right thing to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #60
70. Keeping up the bullshit here is NOT losing the GE...
Jesus you can stretch shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. Try the high road... you know...
Doing the right thing first.

It feels good. Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sure
Just as soon as she quits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. duh. You missed the point, didn't you.
If she quits, there will be some dems who will scream foul play and will feel disenfranchised. This way, she loses fair and square and the party can reunite itself around Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. yep. we don't need it. I've long maintained that Hillary will concede
with grace and strongly endorse Obama- at a time and place of her choosing. She's not some cartoon figure of evil. By the same token, it's time for some of the more zealous Clinton supporters to stop slamming Obama in horrible ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It's too bad that the obama folks won't let her do it...
they want to see her go down in a heap of burning flames...how sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I don't...
I'm a strong supporter of Obama, and have a lot of respect for Hillary. I would love to see her concede with grace and dignity, and I'm happy to give her the space in which to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. ack. they can't prevent her from leaving on her own terms and
leaving with grace. I think that's what she'll do whatever anyone says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick and recommended = time to put this gdp to bed imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. I've said some nasty things... and "I'm coming over"... I really mean this...
to all Clinton supporters... I understand your disappointment and hope that we can get beyond that... Lets get our country back by starting with the White House. There is going to be so much work to do to turn this country around, it is very hard to fathom.... I'm sorry for you that your candidate did not succeed, but I hope we can work together (here on DU) to get beyond that and take this country back...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Absolutely--the minute she stops being an active challenger to the Democratic nominee.
Edited on Wed May-14-08 06:02 PM by Occam Bandage
Part of being in a campaign is taking the lumps that come with politics. Politics is, after all, a contact sport, and you don't get to tell the opposing team not to tackle you just because you can't win. If you want to stop being hit, you have to leave the field.

Now, I recognize that what is and what ought be are different things. Do we need intra-campaign attack ads? No. Those need to stop, and I'm glad they have. Do we need bickering on message boards? No, probably not, but it's unrealistic to think that kind of behavior is going to stop until she drops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. That door swings both ways...
attacks on Obama need to stop as well as the pissy and snarky comments here about him and his supporters since he is the apparent nominee and threads which call out Senator Obama in such demeaning ways must be closed by the mods (although far be it from me to demand what the mods must or must not do).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
15. I totally agree
and if she were to just suspend and back him up, i really think any wounds and any viciousness left over will be dealt with and squashed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. SHe reaps what she sows, if its unity she recieves unity, if its adversary it is also hers to accept
her returns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
68. back at you, don't you think? and enjoy 4 years of President McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. Obama is not the nominee. It is nice of you to speak out against attacks

on Senator Clinton but if you're trying to get us to back Obama, it won't work.

If Howard Dean destroys the party by pushing through Obama's nomination, I, and many others, will write in Hillary Rodham Clinton for president, or vote Green or even GOP.

HRC has won over 16 million votes, not counting those she won in West Virginia. Obama would lose even if we voted for him, but in some polls, nearly 50% of those who voted for HRC would not vote for Obama. Despite that little man at the DNC's big talk, we won't all "fall back in line."

Obama is not ready for prime-time and his recent insults and disrespectful gestures aimed at HRC showed how immature he is. This man shouldn't be anywhere near the nuclear football.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. OP is a Clinton supporter. And by the way, BusyMom, this is exactly why
the attacks on Clinton have not stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. That's a very childish reason
They should just stop. It's what adults do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
64. So the Clinton line is, "Act like adults, because we refuse to?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Look, I agree with you...and...
If you have read any of my posts in the past you will realize that I was and am a huge supporter of Hillary Clinton. I may just write in Clinton too, so keep your pants on.

All I'm saying is that Barack Obama has won the popular vote and the delegates...and I do believe he will be the nominee. I share your feeling that he's not ready for prime-time...and I didn't vote for him in the primaries...but enough people voted for him to make him the nominee. There's no way around that. We lost...I feel sad about it, but it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Okay, let's take a look at what happened here.
Edited on Wed May-14-08 06:21 PM by Occam Bandage
You asked everyone to stop attacking Hillary Clinton for the good of the party. Dembones comes in, and fires off a pack of angry, bitter attacks aimed at Obama (who is the presumptive nominee of the party.) You say that you agree with the attacks, and are considering voting against the Democratic nominee.

Here's an idea: you want people to stop acting petty? Start living the dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
45. You're delusional. She's all but mathematically eliminated.
Can't WAIT until you have to leave DU - we don't need the type of "intelligence" that claims a person without a cerebral cortex can recover from a coma.

(Yeah, I haven't forgotten that particular bit of idiocy on your part.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
19. Totally agree!
I'm a Hillary supporter and I think Obama has the nomination. It changes nothing by letting it play out. She'll drop out when the timing is right and will get behind Obama. I have no doubt about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. But you just started another thread attacking Edwards.
Why is it OK for you to attack a popular Dem who has many supporters but not OK for others to do the same with Hillary?

Personally, I'd love to see the attacks on ALL the Dems stop but I have to say that as long as Hillary continues to use coded racism and impeach Obama's electibility, there's not much chance of that happening here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I didn't attack Edwards.
I said that I don't respect him coming out at this late time and I wished he had come out sooner. That is not an attack. He had stated in the past that he didn't want to come out with an endorsement but chose to do it at a politically opportune time. BTW, I have always really liked John Edwards. I'm just capable of being honest about my feelings about a candidate. I have said plenty of critical things about Senator Clinton as well. I don't just huddle around my candidate and pretend that they are infallible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It's kind of strange to call this a "politically opportune time." The race is over, and in fact
many Clinton supporters are complaining that Edwards is just rubbing it in--you yourself are saying that the race is over, and that Clinton is now harmless. Edwards' timing is good for Obama against McCain, but hardly bad for Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. He should have done what he said he would...
and wait. OR..he should have endorsed him before North Carolina.

It's clear that Obama will be the nominee...so since that is clear, he should have just let it ride. There was nothing to gain for Obama politically by the endorsement...only Edwards stands to gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. So you're saying that he should have done it at a *more* politically-opportune time?
It sounds more like you're just angry, rather than having any particular quibble with timing.

And yeah, there is something for Obama to gain. This helps slam the door on the "white working class" argument Hillary's been pushing--which is an demographic distortion that can indeed be damaging against McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
49. no...at a more politically inopportune time for HIM
...when his endorsement mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #49
62. His endorsement still matters. It's consumed the evening news, and it's killed a bad story just as
it was starting to look like it might have legs. That's a great time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #49
66. His endorsement mattered because it just took the wind out of the last Clinton sails
Meanwhile, imbecile DemBones will be voting for Nader or McCain. The tombstone will be shared with relish. Or parmesan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Edwards came out to unify the party because this has gone on too long.
You decided to act like a concern troll talking about how sad you were that you couldn't respect him now. Well, a lot of us feel even more saddened by Hillary's campaign and us Edwards supporters don't like it when our candidate is called opportunistic. He was the only major candidate who actually talked issues and had a real plan to combat poverty.

If he decides it's time to get behind Obama then I respect his decision. Your lack of respect notwithstanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
29. I agree. Senator Clinton was very conciliatory towards Obama in her interviews tonight, and I think
we should let her be. Let her wind down the campaign on her terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
31. When her and her supporters attacks stop, so will the attacks on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## DON'T DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v4.1
==================



This week is our second quarter 2008 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Whatever you do, do not click the link below!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
35. agree and recommended!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerrad Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
36. Very good post agree! Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
38. I agree
Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
41. With all due respect, YOU don't control the discourse. I will not stop pointing out the facts.
Her lies and race-baiting will not be ignored by me. I can't speak for others, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. So, basically, you can't do the adult thing...
As long as Jimmy and Tommy are hurling insults, I will too! Harrumph!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. The adult thing is NOT letting lies go ignored. NOT letting liars prosper.
Edited on Wed May-14-08 06:49 PM by Zhade
The immature thing to do is plug your ears, cover your eyes and pretend that just ignoring the bad acts of people in authority will make everything okay.

That's what children do.

Pointing out the undeniable FACT that clinton lied about things like Tuzla and NAFTA (among other things) is not hurling insults, no matter how much you wish it was.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. So, you think repeating yourself ad nauseum is going to do anyone some good?
You think we don't all know these things already?

There is a time and a season for everything... it's time to put the barbs away and do something constructive... Clinton is toast. What is the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
47. Then Hillary needs to concede. We heard that she wanted to "wait until after WV" to "end on a win"
Then what happened? Exactly what we knew would- she proclaimed it as some kind of game-changing turnaround, just like PA.

She's made it clear she's not getting off the stage until someone pulls out the Vaudeville Hook, unfortunately.

I think the attacks on her -some of which are warranted, some of which are out of line, IMHO- will stop when she drops out of the race and accepts reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Just let her lose...
What's the big deal? Let the primaries play out, let her finish it up, let the delegate count and popular vote speak for themselves. Where is the problem here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsmirman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #50
55. Therein lies the problem. She continues to class bait and to try to tear apart the party
with her intellectually dishonest positioning on Michigan and Florida. It was brilliant for the Edwards thing to happen in Michigan. Florida is probably a lost cause for Obama, anyway. But it's contemptible that Hillary has done her damndest to turn Michigan and Florida against Obama with a purely self-motivated and logically indefensible position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsmirman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
51. Can you understand, though, how morally offensive I find her position on MI and FL?
My position on this is not some political game or an act of point scoring or anything of the like. To actually state that the delegates should be seated based on the results as is- and I am still flabbergasted that she actually says this- I *never* thought she would embrace a position so at odds with logic- is so reprehensible to me that I could never describe her as "honorable" as Edwards did tonight.

I am legitimately appalled. As a proud American who believes in the rule of law and that the greatest threat to democracy is for an illegitimate result to be presented as a legitimate result and as a proud Democrat who believes in the embrace of rationality over ignorance and demagoguery, I find Clinton's actions unforgivable. And before I have to hear that 48 states is an illegitimate result, that was the consequence of rules that were clearly laid out, with clear indications of what was going to happen that were brazenly disregarded, in furtherance of a system everyone has participated in willingly for many, many years. There could be nothing more illegitimate than "elections" conducted under such hopelessly flawed conditions as existed in MI and FL.

I find the level of intellectual dishonesty in Hillary's position deeply insulting. Particularly in light of what she agreed to in her words and the clear words of her campaign with regard to these situations before political expediency led to her current course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. oh come on
I don't think there should be problem seating Florida, but I would also oppose seating MI as is. Obama didn't even want a revote....but I have a feeling if politically he had thought it would be to his advantage, he woudl have. It's just politics. It isn't personal.

The bottom line is that it is a difference of opinion and not some huge moral argument. We have rallied behind democrats who have had other scandalous crap....and we'll all end up rallying behind Obama despite the Rev. Wright hoo-ha, any financial issues etc...just like we all rallied behind Bill Clinton despite his little debacles.

In the grand scheme of things, this is a straw man issue. Of course she called for the seating of delegates. Any other politician in a race this close would have done the same...including Obama.

I suggest that at some point, if Obama supporters care much about unity they learn a little compassion and understanding...the same compassion and understanding that they hope the voters will have when some of Obama's less fortunate comments come up in the GE courtesy of McCain...when his lapel pin and patriotism, Rev. Wright, Rezko, Cocain use and everything else is brought back up. If you want me to find my way to embrace him and feel a sense of compassion for how he grew up and the mistakes that he made in his past and has made in the Primaries, then I'd politely suggest showing some compassion for the candidate that I supported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsmirman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. You're really not hearing me here. This isn't "just politics" to me. Plenty can be let go
as "just politics". This can't. How can there not be a problem with an election held under the specific guidelines and guidance that the results would not count??? How can you seriously hold to such a position? I just don't get it. How can you possibly know how many voters stayed home as a result of those circumstances? And before you get into turnout, you can't possibly know how many more might have participated. Basic good sense dictates more people will vote in an election that counts than one that doesn't.

This is not a moment of moral failing. This is not a difference of opinion. This is a crass, vile carefully thought out decision to embrace something that is disgustingly illegitimate. It is so incredibly offensive that you don't understand how disgusted I would be with Obama if the situation was reversed. I would NEVER be for the seating of delegates based on an election held under those circumstances. Do you really have the presumption to call me a liar when I say this to you with all sincerity???

This is not a matter of compassion or lack thereof. As I said, this is not about overlooking a scandal. This is a case where a candidate was able to look over something, and in my mind, there was a clear right thing and a clear wrong thing to do- and this candidate chose to pound the table and pervert the issue with something that is morally bankrupt. This was a CHOICE not a failing or an unfair association.

This is not a straw man, and I don't think the term means what you think it does. This is not a false argument created simply to be torn down- this is a candidate flying defiantly in the face of her own party that she signed on to be part of and flying directly in the face of her own words and those of her campaign.

If she chose to make an issue about the lack of a revote and tried to make her case to the SDs and the states that were left all that time ago, that might be one thing- if she tried to make her case by saying Obama doesn't want a revote and I do, that would be a place that there could be a legitimate difference of opinion. But to try to insist on this insane 2205 number and on the delegates being seated, can't you understand that this has nothing to do with compassion, but everything to do with the fact that I have morals that are important to me?

If it wasn't for stuff like this, I would have sympathy for not only her supporters, but even for the woman herself.

But to engage in the kind of intellectual dishonesty that has been the Republicans stock trade for all these years is just awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsmirman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #54
61. Ok... what? Not enough bogus compassion, too much "this is what I believe in"
for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
52. hilary's still a liar, though..you can her to stop that
fucking shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
56. When she quits and gets behind the presumptive nominee.
If she keeps up this shit, she keeps arousing my ire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
57. Hillary Clinton told Brian Williams tonight that she still believes she "will be the nominee."
She also used the number "2210" for the "magic number"of delegates needed to win the nomination, and is confident the DNC Rules Committee will resolve this and include Florida and Michigan.

If she really believes this will happen, I almost feel sorry for her. Terry McAuliffe told Andrea Mitchell today that Hillary Clinton is today ahead in the popular vote--including the votes of Florida and Michigan, of course. Andrea Mitchell just let this pass without comment.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
58. DING DING DING!!!
:thumbsup:

Of course, there have been a few gratuitous attacks on Pres. Obama, too. Same goes for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
59. She should drop out of the race, if she does not like being criticized
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
63. I think you are right and wrong
I agree that Obama is the nominee. And the attacks on Hillary should be toned down and taken entirely out of the ad hominym spectra. However, she is still technically in the Primary, and this is GD: primaries.

And she does not have to let anything "wear down" And she sure as hell isn't doing anything to help things "wind down". If anything, she is winding the tensions up higher. If she was letting the races play out, ok. But her campaign is bringing the pain, doing their level best to damage Obama. Not to win, mind you, but to damage Obama. That is not OK by me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
65. Agreed - K&R. It's probably a good idea to have a few threads a day saying this...
Edited on Wed May-14-08 08:46 PM by sfam
I feel we're sort of feel like Sir Lancelot in Monty Python and the Holy Grail - every now and then the "moment" just overtakes us and we start killing all the wedding guests again, and then stop and say, "Sorry, sorry, I didn't really mean that..."

(You'd have to know the movie to get the reference of course, but killing the wedding guests is sorta funny)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
67. you're right, but personally i think it's too late to undo the damage, and we're not talking about j
Edited on Wed May-14-08 09:36 PM by VotesForWomen
just a few votes; clinton has got almost as many votes as obama, and he should have thought about what his scorched earth tactics were going to do if he got the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC