Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rasmussen: the VP slot is Hillary's if she wants it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:53 AM
Original message
Rasmussen: the VP slot is Hillary's if she wants it
Edited on Sat May-10-08 11:55 AM by Alhena
Rasmussen has a video commentary today which says that the VP spot is Hillary's if she wants it because she has the votes at the convention to make it happen.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll (see link in discussion)

Is that how the VP nominating process works- is it subject to a vote at the convention? If so, then Rasmussen is likely correct- Hillary's supporters will all vote for her, and she will only need something like 10% of Obama delegates to vote with them to have a majority for VP.

So all our discussion of whom Obama should pick may be based on a faulty premise - it may be in Hillary's hands more than Obama's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is malarky. Obama will pick who he wants for V.P. Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alhena Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. But does the convention have to approve it? Picking is one thing, approving another
Even if Obama can deny Hillary at the convention, it will be a nasty scene for party unity if Hillary seeks and is denied the second spot. And she only needs to convince about 10% of his supporters that she should be the VP nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. there is a vote for VP
if she wanted to cause a problem she could try and create a floor fight but it doesn't really make sense you can't force your way onto the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hillary will not be a Vice President. She will be needed in the US Senate where....
...she has achieved both seniority and respect.

"The Vice-Presidency isn't worth a pitcher of warm spit". FDR Vice President John Nance Garner said that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
29. Hillary will be needed in the Senate by Republicans. Hillary and Joe Lieberman. n/t
Edited on Sat May-10-08 01:23 PM by invictus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kicking because I'm interested to find out if that's how it works. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. All I know is that the delegates at the convention vote 'up' or 'down' on the VP nomination. That
is, in modern times, who the presidential nominee has choosen.

Arm twisting also goes on at conventions, and all types of other strange things, so I would not totally count it out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. The DC elites are sh!tting bricks, Clinton wasnt supposed to lose
They dont trust Obama, he's too new to have been corrupted by business as usual, and they have never trusted McCain as he's seen as someone who only looks out for himself.

Their only way left to keep some semblance of power is by trying to force Obama to accept Hillary as VP.

They're hoping the Cheney model has given the VP enough power to maintain a check on Obama to prevent him from undoing the pro-corporate policies that they've enacted over the last 30 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. I can envision Clinton supporters in the DLC and elsewhere
trying to force Obama to have her as VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. No...she should wait until 2012 for the top spot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. In 1956 there was a fight for the VP between John Kennedy and Estes Kefauver....
...when Stevenson was nominated for President, he threw the nomination for Vice-President to the convention.

http://www.chicagohs.org/history/politics/1956.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. Her chances in 2012 are now slim and none
And with recent polling, Slim just packed up his shit and left town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Picture that.
Obama choses a VP... then Hillary forces herself onto the ticket. Brilliant idea. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. I go by this rule of thumb ...
Edited on Sat May-10-08 12:04 PM by frickaline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. I would think that it would end up that way after several ballots....
it would be a compromise, very similar to Kennedy & Johnson, Raygun & Shrub 1.

The main question is could they work together?

Are their interests the same?

Is it in the Democratic Party's interests to have them team together?

Is it in the BEST interest of the country that they come together?

Can they mend the fences so trampled on in the primary season?

Will it work?

How do 2 people with strong personalities work together w/o the 2nd fiddle trying to upstage the first?

There is a lot of work to be done in order for the offer to be proffered.

Will it work? Can it work?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. After reading the questions...I think NO is the answer...to all of them...
I don't see this being good for either of them...how about a disaster in the making that leads to a Rep in 2012??..would it be worth it if that happens???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Clinton would be very wise not to take VP. This will not be good for her
career. If Obama ends up to be a one term president it will be because the voters are disillusioned by the Democrats and are angry that Obama couldn't fix all the awful problems we have fast enough. If Hillary is his VP, she will be tainted by this. If Obama gets 2 terms and she is in second position, she will always be seen as a second. Hillary would be better advised to go back to the Senate, work her ass off and make a name for HERSELF, not Bill, HERSELF. In the meantime, she ought to think about giving hubby the boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Hill
I don't know; there's so much to be done, I really think Obama will need the help not just of Hillary, but of all the other contenders and top dem politicians as well. If this next admin can't get it right, I think our downfall will accelerate. If Hill's destiny were to play the lesser role in an admin that managed to turn things around, that's not peanuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. You make very good points. I guess it's up to her to find a constructive
role in the next administration. I do agree with you that we don't have many more chances left to make it right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. My hunch is that the traditional mechanism will hold -- that the convention
will honor the request of the nominee for the vice presidential nominee.

That does not in and of itself preclude a floor fight or at least some elbowing under the basket, but at that point in the game, Barack Obama will be at the control panel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't think Nuclear Option.3.12.A is a worry
While the convention may have the authority to overrule Obama on his choice, the likelihood they will just isn't there. He is the one in the driver's seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ah, no thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. What you want is not important.
What's best for the party is important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Having Hillary anywhere near the ticket is a disaster for the party
We really don't need race baiting, ego maniacal old politics near a change candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. If Obama fails to get enough delegates, then this can be a bargaining chip
but there is no forcing her way on... either Obama campaign would accept her delegates in trade for the VP slot or he wouldn't

I think SDs will make it a zero possibility before convention

mho... at least that's the RIGHT thing to do... stop a floor fight... with overwhelming numbers... it's apparently, the only way to make her sit down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
21. Rasmussen is full of SHIT look at this article and see why she will not be picked
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/commentary_by_robert_d_novak/michelle_vetoes_hillary
Rasmussen Reports™: The most comprehensive public opinion coverage ever provided for a presidential election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. Interesting.
I never thought about the possiblity that Hillary could force Obama's hand at the convention. I can't imagine why anyone would want to force themselves into a surrogate spot, but then again there's a lot about this campaign season I didn't understand.
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. I would not vote for the ticket if Hillary is on it. Neither will a lot of progressives ...
Edited on Sat May-10-08 01:16 PM by invictus
... and independents. The Republicans would love for Hillary to be on the ticket. It would be a gift to their cause. The Republicans would rally behind McCain and end his financing problems. Picking Hillary as VP would ensure a loss in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. I hope Hillary is his Vp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
31. if O is smart he'll pick her, but hill shoudn't take it, because she'll be tainted by his loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-10-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. Direct link
By Robert Novak? Consider the source...

:boring:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC