Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING 4-29-08 Survey USA: North Carolina - Obama 49 / Clinton 44

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:32 PM
Original message
BREAKING 4-29-08 Survey USA: North Carolina - Obama 49 / Clinton 44
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 01:39 PM by prodn2000
Edited to add a better link from jefferson_dem. (thanks! :-))


http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReport.aspx?g=d4d1bc7e-32d4-438e-8143-75c8b25b3435

Hillary is up 4 points in less than a week!

:woohoo: :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YEM Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. WOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!
This press conference won't help either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JKaiser Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yippie! The tide is certainly changing! Go Hill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
islandmkl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. and...to Hillary's primary history...the last week is Obama's week...
we shall see....

no votes counted so far...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. That must be because Obama hasn't campaigned there yet.
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. (And he isn't running any ads...)
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. Did he take NC for granted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Link here -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Awesome - Thanks for the link. I will edit the OP.
:-)

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panAmerican Donating Member (864 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
42. jefferson_dem, you're a gem!
Tee-hee :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:37 PM
Original message
Good News Indeed!
Thanks:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good News Indeed!
Thanks:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good News Indeed!
Thanks:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good News Indeed!
Thanks:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good News Indeed!
Thanks:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks for the Kicks!
She is closing in on him FAST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
52. You are quintuply pleased!
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 02:51 PM by GoesTo11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. and you said you were not a hillbot
I caught you lying again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. WTF? Put up or STFU. Thanks!
I never EVER said that I wasn't for Clinton.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. last week you said you were not a Hillbot
if not so whats with your whoop nothing wrong with that if you are Hillbot but you said you are not. then when it was reported that Hill underreported her debt you said they did not but today it was just annunced that they fixed the "error" so her debt was really 15.3 million for march, then you claimed you don't attack Obama for Wright but I caught you doing that
you lie a lot it must be in your DNA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Umm....how did I attack wright?
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 01:58 PM by prodn2000
The loan to her campaign was in her initial filings, also.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
102. It was an oversight because supposedly it was listed on the wrong
page:sarcasm: Everything with her campaign is a caculation to minimize her appearance of lying. What sounds worse 15 million debt or 10 million?

so if nothing was wrong what did they have to correct over the weekend.

you are smarter than that don't be so naive

as for wright just go back to our history on the matter,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #102
110. Listen Bozo...
Knock it off. You are being silly or insane.

Your pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. Don't get your hopes up, Obama will win by double digits
among people who have already voted he has a 57-39 lead. I think in the end it will be something close to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Nah...he was leading in the Texas primary among early voters too...
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 02:01 PM by prodn2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. She's not going to win NC or come that close.
But dream on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. he ws 20-25 pts had at one pt. tsk tsk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Isn't this a state where he was supposed to win BIG?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. sure was. Folks here on DU and Obama himself have gotten too overconfident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Well...If you count your chickens before they hatch,
they will never come home to roost!


:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. ha ha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #35
61. Clinton supporters were saying that it didn't matter that Obama was behind by twenty points in PA...
and then came back to lose by single digits. But now that it's possible that Clinton has come back from a big deficit to make it closer in NC, to some Clinton supporters that's a big deal. So why wasn't it a big deal when Obama did it in PA? This is just another example of political hypocrisy practiced by the Clinton camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #61
86. It was impressive that Obama managed that. It is also impressive that Hillary managed this
(if she does manage this). However, I remember it being mostly Obama supporters who were saying how it was such a BIG deal that Obama did achieve that in PA, and now they are saying the opposite about Hillary achieving it in NC. So there is hypocrisy on both sides. I for one say they both deserve props for their achievements, although a win is still a win either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. And surprise surprise he DID win what mattered in TX..DELEGATES DELEGATES DELEGATES
As he did also, in NEVADA and TIED on delegates in NH..

So THREE of the states that she (Thanks Media) claims as HER states, were 2 losses and a tie...for what COUNTS..DELEGATES DELEGATES DELEGATES

I am in no suggesting that she will nt try to undo the delegate count in any way she can, and it's impossible to know how this will turn out....BUT based on the rules of this and ANY primary (even the two her husband ran and won) PRIMARIES ARE ABOUT DELEGATES...NOT "popular vote"..

Super delegates can READ, and they DO know how Rush Limbaugh folks have been pumping up her "numbers" since Texas & Ohio.. They don't seem to like her a whole lot either, or more than 1/4 of them would have piled onto her bandwagon when she announced..

but do enjoy her good fortune right now.. she seems buoyed and radiant when she benefits for the effects of slime politics on others..so she's no doubt having a great time right now...

reminds me of a 9th inning rally by the home team..all quite exciting, except they are down by 12, so that grand slam in the 9th has to be put into perspective, especially since the next batter hit a pop-up to the pitcher for the last out..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. This was just a POLL vs. RESULT comparison
Thanks?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #30
62. Yeah. Who cares about how people actually vote? Just delegats matter. /sarc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #62
71. In primaries, that's just the way it is..
In the general elections popular vote is the measure..

Not all states even record the popular votes in their caucuses..should all their "people who voted" be excluded from the process? There is no law that even makes a state HAVE a primary..They can choose delegates pretty much any way they want (see texas :)..)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #71
109. FAIL. Superdelegates matter just as much. And they will look at the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #109
115. Are you saying that into a mirror? She's not getting the nom, keep dreaming.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
114. Um, he ended up winning Texas after all.
Your point?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. If Hillary comes within 5, Obama is done.
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

Obama is starting to have a coalition that is looking more and more like Jessie Jackson's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brundle_Fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. explain that comment in a way that doesn't make me think you are
race baiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. It's not race baiting, it's the truth.
What is Obama's coalition right now? In a state that has as many affluent liberals and blacks as North Carolina, if Hillary comes within 5, he is unelectable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
79. I guess this means Hillary is Walter Mondale.
Hello, GOP sweep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #79
96. Actually I think Obama might turn out to be Walter Mondale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonestonesusa Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
112. HRCers sound more like Republicans every day.
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 07:10 PM by jonestonesusa
"Affluent liberals and blacks" have long been the base of the party, and they get the least respect from DINO's. Is this the new party line for HRCers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
44. oh for gawds sake!! give it UP..........
when you folks lose you bring out the race card!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #44
76. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #76
108. Get a grip and stop being RUDE. I am a Democrat and I am not the one
mentioning race.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. I'd agree with that in the sense that she is just trying to eek back before Denver
and then the party can go back to her inevitability and not -the innercircle that is- not think of themselves of being full of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. WRONG! Obama would STILL be ahead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Obama will not have 2025 delegates by the end of the primary. So it does not matter. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. Oh but he will.
Counting the superdelegates who have and will endorse him, when the primaries are concluded he indeed will have a majority of delegates. But we shall see. I'd certainly wager money on it though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #45
111. Every Obama supporter backs off when I try to wager. How about you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #19
75. "Obama is starting to have a coalition that is looking more and more like Jessie Jackson's." And?
Do you have something against Jesse Jackson?

Of course you attacked Clinton for saying this as if it were
some sort of insult. You were supposedly an Obama fan then,
remember, "NJSecularist"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #19
88. If Hillary narrows it to a single digit win... It is a bad sign for the Obama camp
imho

Doesn't mean that Obama wont still be the nominee, but it is a bad sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Great stuff
Hope she can keep it within ten and win by 6+ in Indiana... Then on to the strongholds of WV and Kentucky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. WOOHOO!
This is exciting. If she can win NC, which up until now I have had NO hopes for, it will be OVER - Our Girl wins. And this poll is PRE ThrowingWrightUnderTheBusGate! At this point, there WILL be a sizeable contingent of AAs who will decline to show up to vote for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. I sure hope so..
:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. Hillary win in North Carolina ahead!!!
The nomination is hers!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. It is gonna take more that a win in NC, but the path is clear...
:party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. delete
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 02:17 PM by Bensthename
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
32. Other polls show him up by 12 and 14.. So dont get your hopes up too high.
Obama Clinton Spread
RCP Average 04/26 - 04/28 -- 50.3 40.0 Obama +10.3
SurveyUSA 04/26 - 04/28 727 LV 49 44 Obama +5.0
Rasmussen 04/28 - 04/28 774 LV 51 37 Obama +14.0
PPP (D) 04/26 - 04/27 1121 LV 51 39 Obama +12.0


Today from Real Clear Politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Yep.
I am gonna go with the winner, among those, this season...

And this result was before the big endorsement and the controversy regarding Obama's former pastor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
36. Obama doesn't even need to beat Clinton in NC to win at the convention.
There are relatively few delegates in play right now. Obama will be competitive, the superdelegates are committing each day. Obama will not withdraw and he will be ahead in delegates at the convention. Clinton can hope for a VP slot, I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. ha ha MOVE THAT GOALPOST!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. The only goal post is getting a majority of delegates at convention.
You'll never hear me saying anything to the contrary, at any time. I strongly believe Obama will have a majority of delegates when it is time to select a presidential nominee. All else is PR shenanigans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
67. When Obama loses North Carolina it will truly be OVER.
But, he does have a nice house, so, he'll be O.K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. And lots of land too!
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #67
72. It will be over when a candidate gets a majority of delegates.
And not truly before that. I believe Obama will emergy with a majority, you do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #67
92. Not quite
Obama Clinton Spread
RCP Average 04/26 - 04/28 -- 50.3 40.0 Obama +10.3
SurveyUSA 04/26 - 04/28 727 LV 49 44 Obama +5.0
Rasmussen 04/28 - 04/28 774 LV 51 37 Obama +14.0
PPP (D) 04/26 - 04/27 1121 LV 51 39 Obama +12.0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
37. nice! good for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
40. says obama had a 10 pt lead last 2 months with this pollster. oops.



.....
........In North Carolina, Clinton Closes To Within 5 Of Obama: In a Democratic Primary in North Carolina today, 04/29/08, one week till votes are counted, the 10-point lead that Barack Obama has had for two months is halved, to now 5 points, Obama 49%, Clinton 44%, according to SurveyUSA's 7th tracking poll, conducted exclusively for WTVD-TV Raleigh. In SurveyUSA last four polls, over the past two months, Obama has led by 10, 8, 10, and 9 points. Today: 5. White voters are key. Since January, Clinton had led among Carolina whites by 14, 19, 17, 22 and 23 points. But today, suddenly: 31.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
48. Sorry, but you're looking at a bogus poll
SurveyUSA is always more friendly to Clinton than Obama, for whatever reason.

The way you know it's a bogus poll? Clinton went up. She's only done that once before in the entire campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. umm? They are in the very top tier of pollsters this year
Rasmussen, Zogby, ABC/WashPo, No Kudos for them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #49
55. Wrong. Try comparing results to reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Reality or "reality?"
Who is your pollster of choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #49
57. They have a history of overpredicting for Clinton
They were the ones that showed her winning PA by about twice as much as she actually did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. False. They showed her winning by 5. She won by 10.
They overpolled Obama.

Any more excuses you want to make?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #59
70. Sorry, I hadn't seen their most recent PA poll
The one before that had her winning by 14 points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #59
93. She won by 9
If you are trying to make factual claims, use facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #59
116. 9.2, not ten.
Just for the record.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #57
63. If by overpredicting, you mean "getting close to the actual result" then yes, what you say is true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. KILL THE MESSENGER--very Rovian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. God, your hypocrisy is stunning.
Accuse anybody who tells the truth of being biased against you, and if somebody points it out, call them "Rovian."

Try actually comparing poll results to reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
58. Gawrsh.
I wonder what Hill supporters will say if Obama wins, say, 54.7% to 45.3% (a difference of 9.4 points)?

Will they say he won by 10%, 55-45? Or will they say "She got it down to single digits"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #58
85. *crickets*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
60. Change we can believe in!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
64. Clinton leads 2:1 among whites. Cue the racism! excuse
/img]

Obama leads 8:1 among blacks--he is just that damn good a candidate!

Richardson got 2% in NH. He just sucked as a candidate. Him being Latino had nothing to do with it. See, he is no St. Obama. If the messiah doesn't get 90% racism is a factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #64
73. Blacks giving preference to a Black candidate is different than whites doing the same.
Anyone who thinks they're the same thing denies the existence of the oppression of Black people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. I am sure Louis Farrakhan supports Obama for non-racist reasons!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. Why didn't Hillary Clinton reject Ed Rendell's endorsement then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #74
90. "Louis Farrakhan: 21st Century 'Welfare Queen'"
This old canard is truly Reaganesque in its depravity. I have no idea whether or not Farrakhan is bigoted against white people, and I don't care either. But he's not backed up by a white power structure that gives preference to whites in this society. So, yes, it's different in either case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
65. Woooo Hooooo! GREAT NEWS!
K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
66. Wow!!!!!!!!!!!
Great news!!!!!!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #66
68. It sure is....
And the data was mostly before the Governor's endorsement and Obama's unfortunate media problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
78. Her tactics explain her 4 point gain
For example, her despicable use of push-polling by her campaign strategists' company. Hillary would punch a baby in the face if it would win her this primary election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
80. Obama's stuck between a rock and a hard place
A rock



a hard place

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
81. Haha OMG. The best part of that survey is that blacks were 33% of respondents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. are you saying that is high or low for NC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #83
89. For the primary, I'd say that's about 10% off, it should be more like 43%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #89
99. well, in most states so far, men and women were at 40-60% and it is 45-55% here
so, I think it would probably even out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. Yeah saw that too. I wish these pollsters would try harder in the respondent composition or just not
publish that info! Gets me worked up! Ha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
82. Yeah. And hell yeah!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
84. I will be pleasantly surprised if she takes NC.
Not counting on it, but a NC win + an Indiana win will effectively end the Obama campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #84
91. It wont end the Obama campaign but it will give a HUGE push to the Clinton
Campaign. It would make it much more likely she might become the nominee, and would almost guarantee some form of a Unity Ticket. That being said, as much as I wish she would, I doubt she will win NC. I live here, and I just don't think it is going to happen. Though I did get to see Bill Clinton speak in person! So I'm really glad the race has gotten this far. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #91
95. Cool huh, NC will actually make a difference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. I know, it's been very exciting!
plus I've been taking a course on News Analysis while all of this is going on! The professor has been detailing it everyday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
87. eh
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 04:13 PM by Radical Activist
nevermind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
94. Duh, I knew that would happen after PA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
98. Indiana still unchanged Clinton 52% to Obama 43%,
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 04:41 PM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCTLib Donating Member (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #98
101. ....
This is good news even if she doesn't win. Close the gap by single digits when Obama was suppose to blow her out. Lessen Obama's popular vote count. Hell Hillary might be even up in popular votes at the end without FL or Michigan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #101
117. "Popular vote" does not decide the nomination. Never has.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #117
119. Yes and that needs to change, we need to get with the rest of the world!
Proprtional representation and get rid of the archaic electoral system
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #119
121. That's a worthy discussion, for the NEXT round of primaries.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
103. "Survey USA" is a Republican polling organization
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. self delete
Edited on Tue Apr-29-08 05:11 PM by demo dutch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #103
120. Oh, how funny.
It's had the most accurate polling for these past many months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maribelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
105. Rise, Hillary. Rise
Thanks for the post, and thanks also to Dr. Maya Angelou.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #105
118. Lies, Hillary Lies.
TUZLA!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ImpeechBush Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
106. Uh oh. Time for another Sargeant Schultz speech from Obama
"I know naaathing. I saw naaaathing. I heard naaaathing."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
107. I'm calling it Obama by 8-10 points
I don't make exact predictions because those lead to 100's of threads about rounding and "double digits".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
113. NC will go for Obama do not doubt it and he will be the Dem Nominee
Go Obama Go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
122. Cool
he is 15% over what he needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC