all this fuss for probably netting 3 pledged delegates. wake me up when its over

[ourbluenation]

And a CQ Politics analysis of the political circumstances in Pennsylvania’s congressional districts, detailed below, projects an edge to Clinton — but by just 53 district-level delegates to 50 for Obama under the Democratic Party’s proportional distribution rules...

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=news-000002703375

[Submariner]

1. She is doing all this for 3 delegates?

What a sad waste of time instead of bashing the repukes.

[ourbluenation]

3. yep. the only way she will appear to be a winner in PA is to blow him out. it's not gonna happen

[DB1]

2. This really makes you wonder why she's hanging on. Reid was right.

I think this thing is over before North Carolina.

[ourbluenation]

4. I cannot figure out what she's doing? it makes no sense, this hangin on stuff. n/t

[ossman]

5. She wants to run in 2012. President Obama gets in the way of that.

[ourbluenation]

6. if she contributes to mccain beating obama for her own needs, there is NO WAY she'd be the dem nomin

nominee EVER.

[ORDem]

8. BLIND Ambition, period. She's hoping that Barack turns belly up.

No other way to explain it.

:dem:

[locker13]

7. not to defend her

but i would suppose her real plan is to cut into his popular vote total and then say that if you added the FL and MI totals she is winning the popular vote

[cottonseed]

9. It's time for a Cost Benefit Analysis on Clinton's campaign.

Does the benefit of the delegates she's picking up outweigh the costs put upon the Democratic front runner and party as a whole?