|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 01:19 PM Original message |
I wanted EDWARDS. All the way to the CONVENTION. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. I agree it's sneaky but I don't think it's illegal ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Here's something from the state of California |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Here's a little more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. You're right -- "Macaca" happened in VA ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
31. That's a very cool website. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. It was a private fundraiser. There were precautions taken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #32 |
38. I don't think the "private" nature of the gathering is the key here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #32 |
45. Key words: "parties present" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #45 |
53. No, key words: "Consent of all parties" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-16-08 10:40 AM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Good luck enforcing that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. What a mess cellphones (and especially camera phones) have wrought ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
52. Many people were recording the event, even on video cameras. She wasn't the only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
20. That doesn't mean all recording is illegal. Just of "confidential conversations." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Obama wasn't making a speech at the time, he was answering a question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. And how many hundreds of people were at the event? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Here, why don't you read all about how this person penetrated the event |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. No, it was NOT this blogger. Why don't you get the facts before you post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. He suspended his campaign because he got less than 15% of the vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
25. Perhaps. I should have limited the OP to discussion about the legality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poplockndropit (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. such is life. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. Welcome to DU, poplockndropit! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 01:38 PM Response to Original message |
4. You have no idea why Edwards decided to pull out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. The woman who was there was a blogger who supported Obama, not Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:03 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Regardless of whom they supported, I'm sure they did not have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Did they publish a recording online or did they just report what was said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Jon Stewart played the recording on his show last night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Ah, thanks for that info. I was unaware of the recording. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. If a lawsuit were brought, I'm sure it wouldn't be dismissed as "frivolous" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. Don't you think the Obama people would have already announced that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:39 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I really don't know. I'd like to find out though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:56 PM Response to Reply #27 |
33. That still doesn't make anything that happened there a confidential |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Your whole OP is based on an untruth -- a pro-Obama blogger, not HRC, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. It doesn't matter who did the recording, what matters is if she had permission |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #22 |
42. She did have implicit permission. They knew who she was when they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
41. She and many others -- with professional video cams -- recorded openly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. I think there's some question as to whether she REALLY supported Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. purportedly. She's an odd duck. She's written flatteringly about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
16. And Lucianne Goldberg successfully posed as a Democrat for years, eh? How did that work out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. I wonder if he regrets suspending his campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
28. I have not seen one shred of evidence linking this person to the Clinton campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlyingSquirrel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:47 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. As stated before, it doesn't matter whether she was connected to the Clinton Campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. That is really stretching it. There was no illegality, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #30 |
37. Perhaps you should consider taking the statement out of your OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. It's even worse than that. They were NOT asked not to record, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Now that's interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. I agree. Any candidate speaking before a group must expect to be repeated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RememberWellstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
36. Flying bull shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
39. Your whole argument is shot -- the blogger and many others recorded OPENLY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. with our reporter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. There was no agreement that any comments were "off the record." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2rth2pwr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
46. Edwards lied to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
48. The entire basis of your argument is incorrect, Freedom of the Press |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
49. I have to say that I am really astonished that John Edwards didn't say something when this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Maybe he agreed with the people who are concerned that Obama's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-15-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. he could have even said that but silence is astonishing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC