|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:46 AM Original message |
John Kerry looking most closely at John Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seventhson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
1. I am Jiggy with Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StephNW4Clark (547 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
2. I love Wes Clark, and I like John Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. i think both have a place even if none of them are picked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:51 AM Original message |
My gut feeling is and has been for about 6 weeks that Edwards is 'the one' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doosh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:51 AM Response to Original message |
3. no surprise here, the only reason Gep, Clark, Vilsack etc were vetted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:29 PM Response to Reply #3 |
24. "Clark only being vetted out of politeness" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kira (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. I agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 09:01 PM Response to Reply #3 |
40. Douche. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoopie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 09:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
41. God, I hope not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
5. Every legit poll I've seen shows Edwards the clear choice among voters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
27. Edwards is only the clear choice because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sirveri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
6. I personally think Clark would be better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
7. Where has Edwards been lately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doosh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:56 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. meeting with Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 02:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
36. Clark Has Been More Visible, Why??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 07:36 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. Edwards is working for Kerry. The article outlines that quite clearly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoopie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 09:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
42. When? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:19 PM Response to Reply #7 |
19. "At the Kerry campaign’s request, the North Carolinian is doing four major |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Finch (487 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
23. Read the article... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkamber (507 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 02:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
32. NC for Bowles MINN at the DFL convention and more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 02:14 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. yup,most of it is things Kerry himself asked Edwards to do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darkamber (507 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 02:30 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. I love that He's going to Key Speaker at the TX convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 02:39 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. many in the south are pushing for Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoopie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 09:30 PM Response to Reply #35 |
43. I'm Southern AND in a swing state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
9. Kerry doesn't need a trial lawyer (and their bad name) on his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doosh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:00 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Kerry is the military guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
25. Not too much military on the ticket with Clark. Kerry was a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Tit for tat response: he doesn't need a lobbyist either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emulatorloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:02 PM Response to Original message |
11. Clark is my first choice - but an Edwards/Cheney debate would ROCK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TNDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
12. Kerry needs somebody strong on foreign policy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Padraig18 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:12 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. *Kerry himself* will have to mend the relationships, not his VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TNDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:14 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. It's going to take both of them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoopie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 09:33 PM Response to Reply #12 |
47. See! See! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cspiguy (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:08 PM Response to Original message |
13. edwards seems like such a lightweight compared to JFK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doosh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. in whose eyes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 01:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. That's because they were the only two viable candidates in the race. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doosh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 01:06 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. whether one likes Edwards (and Kerry) or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auntie Bush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 01:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
29. You are right...he is no Dan Quail...he couldn't spell and Edwards can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scoopie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 09:37 PM Response to Reply #29 |
49. Well, they are both considered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Edwards was a better lawyer than Kerry was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aldian159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 01:52 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. Edwards is a better lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 09:31 PM Response to Reply #21 |
45. By what standards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 09:36 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. By standards set by his peers, for one. Both were in private practice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:38 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. I read that he received this award because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 11:46 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. Edwards was the fourth most liberal senator in 2003. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
17. Edwards on the ticket... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
22. read the article and the part about bob graham vs john edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trogdor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 12:40 PM Response to Original message |
26. Edwards will be WAY ready to be President in 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
37. I'm very excited about JRE being out there working for Kerry and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Endangered Specie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 09:30 PM Response to Original message |
44. John squared |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salonghorn70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-26-04 09:33 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. HA HA HA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC