Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is it true that Clinton gave China most favored nation status?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:45 PM
Original message
Is it true that Clinton gave China most favored nation status?

If that is true, then it puts Hillary's service to WalMart in an entirely new light.

huh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I do believe he did.
Just after NAFTA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Not only that, he signed a 2% tariff on Chinese goods in US but a 40% TARIFF ON US GOODS IN CHINA!!!
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 07:16 PM by Dems Will Win
That fucker.

That's why all of us are feeling the jobs slip from beneath our feet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yup
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes he did, and rammed it down Congress's throat in the process. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mathewsleep Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. they're a big fan of lead. hrmm.... lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Bill was thinking about lead in his pencil. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. This issue isn't going away ... PA may be closer than she thinks
It's suffered under NAFTA and if Obama is smart, he'll keep reminding
voters of how we ended up with this terrible deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. He's going to start a 5 day bus tour it seems
in PA. I envy the DUers who will get to see him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. They are also HUGE friends to Indian business
It's a shame the Obama press release included that "Punjab" remark because the rest of it is true and would be of interest to working class voters. The Clintons laid the groundwork for all the global outsourcing and are still buddies with the biggest outsourcers, even the ones who have been convicted of monetary crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I am coming to that realization, having been fairly ignorant of trade issues
until recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue State Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. He re-affirmed it.
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 06:59 PM by ingin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. yes, and *sigh* I defended them
even though I thought it sucked beyone belief, from a Human Rights standpoint.

I did the whole, "well, they are an imortant trade partner for us, yadayadayada..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. There's a right way and a wrong way
And if she got her ass on the teevee to slam the bad side of trade the way she does when she wants to slam Democrats, I might give her some slack on the issue. She wants to say she's against all this stuff, but why can she never get 5 Sunday shows when it's about an important issue like war or import standards or US companies polluting foreign countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-25-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yes he did, and it's the single worst thing he did. Keep in mind, this was only
Edited on Tue Mar-25-08 07:15 PM by ChimpersMcSmirkers
a few years after Tiananmen..

"Various legislation introduced in the 102nd Congress to withdraw or severely restrict China's MFN status failed to be enacted, in two instances for failure of overriding the President's veto. In mid-1993, the President set additional human rights conditions for the renewal of China's MFN status in mid-1994, but this policy was reversed in 1994, by delinking the MFN renewal from human rights and other conditions except the freedom-of-emigration requirement, triggering new legislative measures to restrict China's MFN status, none of which was enacted. "

http://www.fas.org/man/crs/92-094.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC