Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Edwards endorses HRC, it means he's sold out the workers and the poor.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 03:06 AM
Original message
If Edwards endorses HRC, it means he's sold out the workers and the poor.
Edwards cannot endorse the candidate of Corporate America and the health care industry and still claim he was ever fighting for the people who were left out in the cold.

There is no way to be a "pro-business" populist.

He should just not endorse anybody and then introduce populist platform positions at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, it means that's his genuine opinion
I supported Edwards the whole way. I now back Obama. But just because someone disagrees with me on something doesn't
make them a demon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. I don't see Edwards making an impulsive decision.
He appears to be taking his time to think long and hard at his options. Who knows, he may not endorse anyone.:shrug:

Where is this Edwards endorsement coming from anyways? The water cooler chatter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. He isn't going to endorse anyone - I was just responding to the idea
He will definitely NOT endorse Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. I wouldn't rule it out.
It'll be a weighty endorsement, and Edwards sees a different side of each candidate than we do.

Edwards was my first pick, so it'll be especially interesting for me to see if he offers his support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Imo, it would against everything I supported
and still support in John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doyourealize1 Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. HRC's healthcare issue is most important to Edwards
To say that Obama's plan for the healthcare industry caters less to corporate interests than HRC's is foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It will be possible to influence an Obama Adminstration from outside and below.
It can't be possible to influence a DLC-HRC adminstration through organizing and protest. Once you've taken that much corporate money, you can't be on the side of the workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. And You believe Obama, who "guarantees a seat at the table to
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 04:18 AM by saracat
corporations and insurance companies" hasn't taken corporate money? What about previous elections and what about current bundling in this race? Obama isn't on the side of the workers.And Hillary has Edwards health care plan. Obama doesn't support universal health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. As Krugman pointed out, because Obama is against a mandate, it will be impossible...
...politically for him to get one. Thus making his health care plan nothing more than something to line the pockets of health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Back it up.
Have you actually read her plan? Read this: http://hillaryclinton.com/issues/healthcare/summary.aspx

Insurance and Drug Companies: insurance companies will end discrimination based on pre-existing conditions or expectations of illness and ensure high value for every premium dollar; while drug companies will offer fair prices and accurate information.

Does anyone actually believe this has a shot in hell of passing? I have a hard time reading this sentence without laughing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. 100% true... Edwards even attacked Obama on this point...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. I woudl agree. If Edwards endorses Hillary it will be on the basis of her healthcare plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hillary has a tremendous amount of support from unions. Have they sold out?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 03:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Actually, some of them have.
As a union man, I've often seen the leadership of the labor movement settle for little if anything.

The unions endorsed Bill in '92 even though he gave them nothing at all and even though he wouldn't allow the WORD "union" to be used in the "Democratic" platform he stood on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. Nearly all of the major unions have already endorsed Obama
I guess I don't see what you are getting at here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
39. 1. Not true. 2. Even so, the members vote for Hillary... so who sold out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Can you please provide some stats on this?
I would like to see them. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
54. Good Point : ) (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Edwards probably thinks Hillary can win and Obama can't
That is the goal, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Edwards, like Gore and many others, sees that it's best to let the voters sort this out.
The superdelegates will get their turn, and I doubt Edwards wants to interfere in the process. Like everyone else, he is in wait and see mode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. That is the latest Clinton campaign meme Edwards will mimic,
b/c since he's left the race that's all he's been doing.

It was obvious that the Clintons and Edwards were together from the beginning. As they say, birds of a feather flock together. Both members of the DLC, both voted for a war to further their political career.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. Edwards is smarter than that and he knows
Obama will win so why would he backer a Loser like hilary, lies her head off, clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah Hillary


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hillary is a Democrat; Lieberman isn't; this is childish and inaccurate
It looks like you don't like mommy and daddy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Kinda like hilary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. I thought it was hilary/mccain? They're both gross but hilary likes 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VeraAgnes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. That is really awful.
The Primaries are still active and alive informing you that either Senator Obama or Senator Clinton will be our nominee. I don't have any respect for such hatefulness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
14. Edwards is Bill Clinton, Part II.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
16. I don't care what he does
Nothing from him surprises me after his 2004 campaign for VP. Shit or get off the pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
17. Has it ever occurred to you that Edwards could possibly endorse
someone because he thinks they are the best person for the job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Only if it's Obama around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zee Miller Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. No doubt...
And elsewhere on the I'm such a leftist MAN blogosphere.

Goddess protect EDWARDS if he endorses the truest Democrat, Hillary Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
18. "the moral test of our generation"-speech from edwards
<http://www.johnedwards.com/news/speeches/20071029-moral-test/>
here's an excerpt

"And a few weeks ago, around the sixth anniversary of 9/11, a leading presidential candidate held a fundraiser that was billed as a Homeland Security themed event in Washington, D.C. targeted to homeland security lobbyists and contractors for $1,000 a plate. These lobbyists, for the price of a ticket, would get a special "treat" -- the opportunity to participate in small, hour long breakout sessions with key Democratic lawmakers, many of whom chair important sub committees of the homeland security committee. That presidential candidate was Senator Clinton.

Senator Clinton's road to the middle class takes a major detour right through the deep canyon of corporate lobbyists and the hidden bidding of K Street in Washington -- and history tells us that when that bus stops there it is the middle class that loses.

When I asked Hillary Clinton to join me in not taking money from Washington lobbyists -- she refused. Not only did she say that she would continue to take their money, she defended them.

Today Hillary Clinton has taken more money from Washington lobbyists than any candidate from either party -- more money than any Republican candidate.

She has taken more money from the defense industry than any other candidate from either party as well.

She took more money from Wall Street last quarter than Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, and Barack Obama combined.

The long slow slide of our democracy into the corporate abyss continues unabated regardless of party, regardless of the best interests of America.

We have a duty -- a duty to end this."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
19. I've no doubt he'll be offered an appointment in an Obama admin. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
20. What nonsense. Bush/mccain want to keep stealing from your paycheck. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
21. Huh??? Wasn't Obama EXPOSED on his NAFTA doublespeak?
Sorry, "hope" isn't worth a damn when the Obama, Clinton, and McCain administrations have a labor policy that is substantially the same...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
22. yes of course because anyone that does not
support Obama aka JFK, aka MLK, aka Savior of the free world, aka best thing since the hula hoop, aka God walking on water, then we are delusional, a freeper, a baby killer, a racist, or scum sucking corporate whores. Yes that's it. Never mind that some us us just DO NOT BELIEVE what comes out of his mouth, and can see that he has NEVER put his words to action unless it was expedient to further the illusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedShoesBlueState Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Succinctly and well-put
Thank you. If it seems too good to be true, then it probably isn't. That's what MY grandma taught me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. so I guess his bill to require the videotaping of interrogations
was just to further the illusion, as was his support for an EIC in Illinois. And his speeches against the war weren't really efforts to stop the war any more than my renting a car and driving to a pre-war protest were "actions".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. Oh that LANDMARK legislation that
many other states had done already. Yeah that was earth shattering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. so now we are comparing "earth shattering" legislation?
Perhaps Hillary has a list of earth shattering accomplishments? She certainly helped to shatter Iraq, but I wasn't aware of how she shattered the rest of the world. It's easy to say somebody has done nothing if you are prepared to minimize everything they've done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. No need to minimize
the already minuscule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
25.  Then he should not endorse Obama either. Personally I hope he doesn't endorse either corprat
Edited on Wed Mar-19-08 01:55 PM by Blue State Native
candidate. They sold him out and stole his ideas and message. Fuck em both!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. Edwards knows Obama is as corporate as Clinton so that isn't a factor in a rational person's decisio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. John Edwards would not only sell out
the workers and the poor he would be selling his soul. And, I can't even believe were having to anticipate this!

I just don't how he would do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zee Miller Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
46. Go to Hollywood and join
the Giant Clam in the Sky Scientologists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
34. Edwards is a politician.
Despite his speeches, IMO he is nothing more than that. He will do what is politically expedient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. They are both pretty corporate :(
I support Obama, but that's just the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foxer Donating Member (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
42. He's giving them both "time out"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
45. sorry to say, I always found something a bit insincere about him
and a bit calculated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
50. why are people being so histrionic. he hasn't even come close to...
endorsing her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-19-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
51. Obama is not anti-corporation person either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-20-08 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
53. I am a strong Edwars supporter and yet I totally agree with your post. You said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC