Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton: Delay the Delegate Count (Because I'll Lose)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:38 PM
Original message
Clinton: Delay the Delegate Count (Because I'll Lose)
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 01:41 PM by lamprey
Dallas News: Sat, Mar 15, 2008

Clinton: Delay the Delegate Count (Because I'll Lose)

The Hillary Clinton camp has tried every avenue to delay reporting on the delegates from the Texas primary. They tried to intimidate the Texas Democratic Party prior to the primary. That failed. On election night, they threw up a duststorm of objections about irregularities. Now, the Clinton camp us urging the state party to delay the March 29 county and senate conventions, where details of how 67 delegates picked in the county caucuses will be announced. @Mad Milly and the Monster by Wayne Slater

Why are they doing this? Because they are losing.

CNN projects that Barack Obama won the Texas caucuses with 38 convention delegates, compared to 29 for Clinton. The Texas primary is a complicated, two-step process. Clinton won more delegates than Obama in the popular-vote portion, 65 to 61. With his likely caucus-delegate haul, looks like Obama won the overall statewide delegate lead, 99 to 94 -- or once superdelegate endorsements are factored in, 109 to 106.

Hillary Clinton declared victory in Texas and moved on. As for these pesky details, like delegates, that's the last thing the Clinton campaign wants to talk about.

http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2008/03/clinton-delay-the-delegate-cou.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. But it all depends on what the definition of LOSING is.
triangulate that : - )))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lose the Texas caucuses
and overall Texas delegate count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. it's a joke son : - )))
like what the definition of is.. is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I said, Whats the big idea of bashin me on the noggin?
I love me some Foghorn Leghorn :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. We need some more Foghorn Leghorn around here to make things right
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:50 PM
Original message
Foghorn/Bush: That boy's as sharp as a billiard ball.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. A couple of sandwiches short of a picnic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. 'The boy's like taxes, he just don't know when to stop'
I'm no chicken, I'm a Rooster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let me see, fight voting irregularities, or not?
What would Al Gore, John Kerry or John Edwards do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. All bush votes were highly irregular
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dempartisan23 Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. hillary is taking us down with her
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good grief - what next??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Clinton Campaign keeps trying to scrabble up that slippery slope
It won't be long until the overarching theme of Sen. Clinton's campaign will be Sisyphean defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC