Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UK Labour MP: Blair would vote for Kerry!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 08:50 AM
Original message
UK Labour MP: Blair would vote for Kerry!
Too little too late, Mr. Blair.

PAYBACK TIME OVER IRAQ, BLAIR TELLS BUSH

Apr 16 2004

By Bob Roberts, Political Correspondent


TONY Blair will today tell George Bush in crisis talks on Iraq: "It's payback time."

snip

A Downing Street official denied tensions were growing between the US and UK. He said: "This is not a negotiation. This is a chance to talk through the serious issues we are both facing."

Earlier Mr Blair held talks with UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan. They hope to produce a draft resolution which can be put to Mr Bush.

LABOUR MP Sir Clive Soley said yesterday Mr Blair would vote for Democrat John Kerry to be President if he was a US citizen.

He denied a reported ban on the PM's aides helping Democrats meant he wanted a Bush win.

more from the UK Mirror:
http://tinyurl.com/2c54z
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL Kick
:kick: priceless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Shock and Ahhhh
Another European leader who wants to see * gone?

It just can't be true... /sarcasm

O
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe Blair relishes REAL intellectual conversations. . .
which is what he had with Clinton. . .
which is what he'd get from Kerry. . .
which he knows, in his heart, he'll NEVER ever get from *

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-16-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. It only makes sense
"New Labour" in the UK is little different from the DLC "New Democrats" in the US. Instead of focusing on their core constituencies (workers, minorities, disadvantaged), they both remade themselves in the 1990s to become more like the Tories/Republicans: appealling to big business (and big money), suburban middle-class voters with upper-class pretensions, and abandoning all pretexts of being for "the little guy".

At least Blair is hopefully starting to see the light-- especially after Labour has had its arse handed to it in several by-elections, where long-time Labour districts have gone to the (3rd Party) Liberal Democrats.

Good for Tony. Maybe he and the rest of "New Labour" will see the light and start worrying about their natural constituency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-04 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bullshit
Bullshit designed to placate those in "new" labour who are worried that Blair is a neo-con in disguise. This is pure speculation by Soley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. The guy practically campaigned for Gore. Of course he's going to like...
...Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-17-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. By the way, what kind of sentence is this:
"He denied a reported ban on the PM's aides helping Democrats meant he wanted a Bush win."

I believe the idea that there's a ban is bullshit, and this statement doesn't clear that up. What's a "reported ban" and why didn't they simply quote what this guy said rather than characterize it?

Could it be that he said there is no ban? Is the Mirror extending the life-expectancy of that lie by calling it a "reported ban" after Sorley denied there was ban, and do they not give the quote because that would have shown that the ban doesn't exist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC