Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC: Obama flip flops on Drudge photo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:45 AM
Original message
ABC: Obama flip flops on Drudge photo
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/obama-flips-on.html

Obama Flips on Whether Clinton Leaked that Photo

March 11, 2008

Obama: "I take Senator Clinton at her word that she knew nothing about the photo. So I think that's something that we can set aside."

- Cleveland debate, February 26, 2008

Obama: "When in the midst of a campaign you decide to throw the kitchen sink at your opponent because you're behind, and you start, your campaign starts leaking photos of me when I'm traveling overseas wearing native clothes of those folks, to make people afraid, then you run an ad talking about who's going to answer the phone at three in the morning, an ad straight out of the Republican playbook, that's not real change. That's not real change. That's the same old thing."

-- Jackson, Mississippi, March 10, 2008



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. You know, the new politics of "change"
...looks an awful lot like the politics that I've been seeing since the 1980s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:17 AM
Original message
meet the new boss same as the old boss...Obama pulled the same shit in IL
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:18 AM by ElsewheresDaughter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
39. That doesn't surprise me.
It doesn't make him a bad person or even a bad candidate. Pretty typical, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #39
73. The problem is he claims to be atypical and a saint
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #73
87. Oh, that's just a selling point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
81. Or maybe Obama's just coming around with the rest of America ...
... as Hillary Clinton makes a fool of herself, so very publicly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. LOL !!! - He's Flip-Flopped On Taking Hillary At Her Word ???
I'd say that's very good and sound judgment.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
36. Yes, indeed. Very good judgment.
You give Hillary an inch and she'll take a mile and lie all the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
77. a play on words!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
80. Exactly!! She's flip-flopping on the reality of her campaign's VP talk ...
... she's flip-flopping on earlier agreements on FL & MI delegates,
... she obfuscates and qualifies her comments on Obama's Christianity,


... so Obama's learned that Clinton's word isn't to be taken seriously, and he understands that her protestations of innocence mean nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
85. *snap*
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. bbbbbut
it's the "new politics."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. Wasn't Your God Supposed To Be Above Lies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. talk to Jake Tapper/ABC
btw, would you like to provide us with proof the photo came from the Clinton camp?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #27
44. Churning up the ol' chum bucket. Here...Rezko, "present", flipflop on war...that should hold you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Uuugh, maybe he found new evidence to support that the Photos came from her days later.
This post is pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
74. If he had such evidence it would have "leaked" to the press a long time ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
75. Ditto. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Gee big scandal
I have yet to see Hillary make any efforts to find that leaker in her campaign. She may not have known about it, but I don't sense that she was bothered by it being leaked. She should conduct a top to bottom review of her whole campaign, a full investigation, to find the leaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WDIM Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thats not a "flip flop" (nice use of neo-con terminology)
He says he takes "Senator Clinton at her word that SHE knew nothing about the photo."

Then the second quote "your CAMPAIGN starts leaking photos of me"

Candidates do not know everything that is going on in their massive campaigns.

There is nothing "flip flop" about it. But it shows how pathetic our system is when Democrats start using Neo-Con jargon to bring down other democrats. Rove is very proud of you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. flip flop didn't come from Hillary
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 07:55 AM by ccpup
it came from ABC. But nice way to smear Hillary with your Rove Brush while missing the fact that she didn't write the headline.

edited to correct AP to ABC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WDIM Donating Member (267 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. No the original poster used "flip flop"
The article just says "flips"
I was talking to the original poster using right wing jargon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. gotcha
I still struggle using my English to Right Wing Jargon dictionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. "As far as [you] know"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Talk to ABC
and explain how "that's something we can set aside" becomes that's something we'll use in Jackson, Mississippi even though we have no proof it ever happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. "of those folks"
If Hillary (or anyone on DU) had said "native clothes of those folks", she (and they) would be attacked mercilessly as racist.

Of course the charge would be b.s., but the Obama Supporters would be Up In Arms over it! Repeatedly! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. Where's the flip-flop?
On February 26, Obama said he believed that Hillary knew nothing about the photo.

On March 10, Obama suggested that her "campaign" leaked the photo.

Especially given how poorly Hillary has managed her campaign this season, it's perfectly understandable that she would not know what her henchmen were up to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. "that's something we can set aside"
for two weeks. Until we pick it up again.

Btw, where's the proof the Clinton campaign leaked it? The only person who has claimed they did is Drudge, who never provided any proof at all.

Noone else has ever corroborated it. Ever.

So Obama now takes Drudge at his word?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. The fact that none of Drudge's story has been proved has come up before
and has never been answered. The motives of the RW shill who accused Hillary's campaign have never been questioned. The fact that the picture had already been distributed in a supermarket tabloid was discounted. All of a sudden Drudge is considered a credible source of information about a Democratic candidate. It defies all explanation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. They can't answer it. There's no proof. It's just an unsubstantiated bit of slander
which the "new politics" candidate is now using in his stump speech. Two weeks after he said on national television he wanted to "set it aside."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
46. BO believe that slimeball Drudge!!--BO is now part of the RW slime machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #46
53. "stop spreading dangerous concocted rumor you just made up please."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. Its BO making the Statements!!---Drudge has NEVER produced the email!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. Tapper is an inside DC MSM whore
Never take anything he says seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abacus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. He never said that her campaign wasn't involved,
just that he trusted that she did not know anything about it. As I said in another post, the statements are not mutually exclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
41.  "I take Sen. Clinton at her word that she knows nothing about the photo," he said.
Clinton denied any knowledge of the photo coming from one of her staff.

"So far as I know, it did not," she said. "That's not the kind of behavior that I condone or expect from the people working in my campaign."

Obama, a senator from Illinois, said he believes her.

"I take Sen. Clinton at her word that she knows nothing about the photo," he said.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/26/dems.debate/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debatepro Donating Member (683 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
65. Good point
That "she knew nothing about the photo." and someone from her campaign leaked the photo to drudge are not a controdiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #65
83. "So I think that's something that we can set aside." said BO. But he LIED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. "CLINTON VAGUE ABOUT CONTROVERSIAL OBAMA PHOTO"
http://wcbstv.com/campaign08/barack.obama.hillary.2.662447.html

CLINTON CAMP HAS NEVER DENIED USING THE PHOTO, even when directly asked.

Clinton, who has worn native dress herself, like during a trip to Jordan in 1999, responded through a campaign manager Maggie Williams.

"If Barack Obama's campaign wants to suggest that a photo of him wearing Somali dress is divisive, they should be ashamed," Williams said.

Team Clinton never actually admitted they had anything to do with the photo but …

"No, no … it's unlikely that it came up by accident," political expert David Birdsell said.

And it could end up backfiring on Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
14. Meet the new bullshit from ruggerson, same as the old bullshit
You are such a bore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. DING. DING. DING. We have a winner.
But the same applies to most of the Hillary posters here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Obama playbook rule #1: attack the messenger whenever there is no other defense
I know you're frustrated. You have my sympathy. Truly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #22
26. You lead this board in substance-free irrelevancies
I know it sucks to be you. You have my sympathy. Truly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. I bow down to you in that regard
the crown prince of ad hom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #22
71. no defense? why does he need a defense?
For a photo of him wearing cloths of the people he was visiting. All politicians do it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. Well, before he blames her for this one, which is all over the RW blogosphere......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
43. seems now BO=RW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. Hillary flip flops on MI... likes states where her opponets name isn't on the ballot
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:03 AM by mckeown1128
NHPR's Laura Knoy: "So, if you value the DNC calendar, why not just pull out of Michigan? Why not just say, Hey Michigan, I'm off the ballot?"

Hillary Clinton: "Well, you know, It's clear, this election they're having is not going to count for anything"


http://www.nhpr.org/node/13858


After elections where many stayed home because they were told that they weren't going to recieve any delegates...


Clinton told Smith that she had promised not to campaign in either state, and had kept her word – but that she had never said she would not ask for the results of those contests to be made official, a request her campaign made public on the eve of Florida’s January vote.


http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/22/clinton-says-again-florida-and-michigan-votes-should-count/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. States where the supers support her. If the state's delegates don't count the supers don't count
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:12 AM by Windy
That is why she is so eager to have primaries now in MI and Florida!

Its about the supers. She may not win Michigan. I live her. Not a lot of Hillary love in this state. However, Granholm, Levin, Stabenow, Dingle et all are HRC supporters.

Its not about the people. Its about the supers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
23. I read this as he believes Clinton herself knew nothing of this...
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:06 AM by Zueda
but someone in her campaign did. Which is what I happen to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. "that's something we can set aside"
until we use it two weeks later at a campaign rally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
24. Flip Flop?
I think it is evidence that he was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt until a pattern emerged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
33. Not Sure Why He's Saying Stupid Stuff Like That, When There's No Reason To Believe She Had Anything
to do with it. Amazingly enough, his supporters here are defending it of course, even though he's using the same deceitful and dirty tactics she's accused of using.

Pretty sad to see him doing that, since he's supposed to be above using lies and all, but we obviously see that isn't true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #33
40. BO dis-hononed himself yesterday for the World to see: see this comment from him.


Clinton denied any knowledge of the photo coming from one of her staff.

"So far as I know, it did not," she said. "That's not the kind of behavior that I condone or expect from the people working in my campaign."

Obama, a senator from Illinois, said he believes her.

"I take Sen. Clinton at her word that she knows nothing about the photo," he said.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/26/dems.debate/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #40
48. I'm Actually Really Disappointed In Him For That. He's Supposed To Be Better Than That. He Isn't.
I hope she hits him back on his lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #48
62. So, do I. He has proven with this incident (many more)--that he will play Racial politics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
34. Yeah nothing could have happened in twelve days to make him change his mind.
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:21 AM by LoZoccolo
Especially since Hillary still won't deny it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. Clinton denied any knowledge of the photo coming from one of her staff.
Clinton denied any knowledge of the photo coming from one of her staff.

"So far as I know, it did not," she said. "That's not the kind of behavior that I condone or expect from the people working in my campaign."

Obama, a senator from Illinois, said he believes her.

"I take Sen. Clinton at her word that she knows nothing about the photo," he said.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/26/dems.debate/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
38. REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
45. Is there any proof that this came from Clinton's staff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
47. Flip-flop? I don't see any flip-flop there.
Sen. Clinton didn't know about the photo. Sen. Clinton's campaign did. Where's the disconnect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. "that's something we can set aside"
until we drag it out two weeks later at a campaign rally?

And, where's the proof of what Obama claims? Where's the proof it came from the Clinton camp? The only person who has claimed that is Drudge, who never provided any proof at all. It's never been corroborated by anyone ever.

So Obama is now using uncorroborated Matt Drudge=floated rumors in his campaign speeches?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #50
51. You'll note that her campaign never denied any involvement with the leak.
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:49 AM by Occam Bandage
(And you're angry Obama didn't "set it aside?" He offered to. Clinton continued to take the low road. He's firing back.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #51
52. where's the proof?
If a man running for president states something as fact, shouldn't there be proof other than taking Matt Drudge at his word?

And why the flip? Why is it something we'll "set aside" one week and then turn around and use it the next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #52
55. Silly.
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:57 AM by Occam Bandage
When a campaign faces a high-profile rumor, they deny it if it's untrue, and talk around it if it's true. (If it's true and they outright deny it, Drudge releases the email and they look even worse.) Seriously, this whole story has been damaging to Clinton's campaign. You recognize that it has been damaging, because you're starting threads on it. So, if the story's false, isn't she an idiot for never denying it, despite multiple statements on the affair?

And the reason for "the flip" is obvious: he offered to set it aside. Clinton continued to play gutter politics. He's calling her on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. you're giving me opinion
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 09:00 AM by ruggerson
not fact or evidence. That's because there are no facts or evidence to reference. Personally, I think this has been far more damaging to Obama than Clinton, which is why I'm kind of puzzled he brought it up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #56
67. "Personally, I think this has been far more damaging to Obama than Clinton"
Ahaha. Which is why Clinton supporters get frothy each time someone mentions it, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
49. Oh, but, but, but, but....that's DIFFERENT...
...he can lie about this and lie about when he'll end the war, but that Kool-Aid is so powerful it doesn't matter to the True Believers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
54. There is a difference between attacking the campaign and attacking HRC in this instance
He can legitmately say He take Hillary at her word that she knew nothing about it but knocking her campaign for leaking it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. Same effect and BO knows it as do you. BO would not have brought it up if he
thought it had no negative effects on Clinton.

Get a grip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
58. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
59. "I take Senator Clinton at her word that she knew nothing about the photo." She's clueless, but that
doesn't mean her campaign didn't do it. Is she investigating?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
61. Foolish. Those are totally consistent statements.
Looks like ABC is throwing logic aside in their quest for dirt.

Statement one: Obama is referring specifically to Hillary and what she knows. He doesn't believe that she was personally involved.

Statement two: Obama references Hillary's CAMPAIGN and what Drudge claims they did. Could Hillary's campaign have sent this photo without her knowledge? Absolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #61
63. Silly comment: BO has proved he will play the RACE card yesterday. He brought
up an issue that he knew would cause trouble.

your distinction sucks and you know it as he knew it.

He Dishonored himself yesterday and is in the sewer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Infinite Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
64. "When your CAMPAIGN starts leaking photos..." These quotes mesh just fine. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
66. Well, it's not real change
Now, is it? It's more of the same old crap. And people are tired of it. It doesn't solve anything. It doesn't get anything done. It's divisive. It's cheap. It leaves also-rans lost in the limbo of history, forever saddled with ridiculous nicknames and slogans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
68. I'd like to see the context of the 3/11 statement
Was he asked about it? Did he bring it up himself? I'm trying to give him the benefit of the doubt and think it was the former. If he brought it up himself, that's a very different story, and would show Obama as someone trying to dredge up an unproven Drudge story.

Either, way, the fact that this is even still being discussed (A Drudge story!!) is puzzling in itself. First, the photo wasn't "leaked." It had already been published by a tabloid and widely distributed. Second, Drudge, as usual, offered no proof that the Clinton campaign disseminated it in any way. Are we taking Drudge's word now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
69. The crux of the issue is that he waited two weeks before bringing this up again.
And he does it on the eve of an important election. In other words, it's a sucker punch.

Obama is within his rights to do it, but let's please get rid of the notion that he takes the ethical high road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
70. Maybe his team has gathered more intel
All I'm saying is maybe at the time he believed her, but now he has more info on the matter


Do HRC supporters really suggest that you can not change your mind after gathering more information

You know like voting for a WAR, do you really think she would vote that same way today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
72. So that's where the Obamanuts here get that "kitchen sink" talking point from.
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 11:01 AM by cat_girl25
Parrots!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
76. Well Hill flip flops on being a democrat. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
78. A lot of people have a hard time understanding satire.
But by know the satire in the first comment should be obvious to anybody who hasn't got his or her head shoved firmly up her ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not the Only One Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
79. He probably has learned more about this since then
He probably has learned more about this since then that suggests he was giving Hillary too much credit in February.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. Lame---. also you can bet it would be in press
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
84. Which makes Obama like any other...
politician. As a matter of fact, he is worse because he pretends to be better than all others even though he is just a political type like all the others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
86. Obama flip flops on Nafta, the Iraq war, Iraqui withdrawl, just about everything
except where he doesn't vote

or votes present
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
88. From February 26 to March 10 he probably realized that Hillary's dirty tactics
made it impossible not to believe the truth of her campaign's involvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
89. Can't Say Anything About This, So I'll Just Give A Simple K & R (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC