Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login

CAN PRESS: Officials Only Got Briefing From Obama Campaign- KO, Randi, et al...BIASED 4 Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 07:16 PM
Original message
CAN PRESS: Officials Only Got Briefing From Obama Campaign- KO, Randi, et al...BIASED 4 Obama

Canadian Press: Canadian officials only got briefing from Obama campaign - not Clinton

3/7/2008 6:21:47 PM

The Canada Press reports:

Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton never gave Canada any secret assurances about the future of NAFTA such as those allegedly offered by Barack Obama's campaign, Prime Minister Stephen Harper's office said Friday.

With the NAFTA affair swirling over the U.S. election and Canadian officials skittish about saying anything else that might influence the race, it took the PMO two days to deliver the information.

After being asked whether Canadian officials asked for - or received - any briefings from a Clinton campaign representative outlining her plans on NAFTA, a spokeswoman for the prime minister offered a response Friday.

"The answer is no, they did not," said Harper spokeswoman Sandra Buckler.

More from Bloomberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-08-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Toronto Star doesn't agree : The truth has been lost in the storm.
To quote some other objective fellow DUer's, it's basicially FUBAR'd with Canadian officials and press now backpeddling and printing disputing accounts all over the place.

Truth has been lost in the storm
Mar 08, 2008 04:30 AM
Thomas Walkom


"None of this has stopped the Brodie-NAFTA story from dominating the Commons. But in the process, much of what happened or didn't happen has been lost.


First, remember that the basis of this whole saga is a Democratic critique of NAFTA that few believed was sincere. Both Clinton and Obama talk tough. But their remedies are modest (both want unspecified labour and environmental standards) and achievable (Canada and Mexico are desperate to keep NAFTA alive).

Second, there was not one leak but three. Brodie did tell some reporters on Feb. 26 that Clinton had assured Ottawa she was kidding about NAFTA. But it seems he was either wrong or fibbing. Her campaign denied talking to Canadian officials and dared Ottawa to prove otherwise.

The second leak occurred the next day when CTV reported that Obama's camp had told Canada their candidate's NAFTA attacks weren't serious.

The third and most damaging leak happened the day before the March 4 Ohio primary, when The Associated Press got hold of a Canadian diplomatic memo citing a senior Obama staffer as saying that the Illinois senator's NAFTA critique was just political posturing.

Now it may be Harper planned the entire caper. But it's not clear why he would mastermind an operation fated to result in his own embarrassment (unlike off-the-record comments, written memos cannot be plausibly denied).

As for the hapless Brodie, it seems he was just using his don't-quote-me status to tell mistruths to the press which is one of the things political aides are paid to do.

(bold-face mine)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Sep 24th 2017, 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC