|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
MojoMojoMojo (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 02:51 PM Original message |
Care to explain why Obama had no oversight on Afghanistan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's rich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
2. another senate committee has that task, not his. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudythescribbler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:10 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Actually, it's another SUBcommittee -- chaired by Kerry nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wayjose (74 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Yes, John Kerry has already explained it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudythescribbler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. Sure -- but how widely known is that -- even among wonks on DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
3. Because he's the head of the Europe subcommittee, and Afghanistan is not in Europe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. But of course, you know that Europe is Europe, Right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ellenfl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
5. sure. as i have heard it explained, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Actually they can - though on the biggest issues the oversight will be in the full committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malta blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
6. Well, for one, something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. For the same reason I haven't had any oversight on Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnarchoFreeThinker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:11 PM Response to Original message |
9. attention fellow billy goats: do not cross the bridge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
here_is_to_hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
10. If your cheap ass would donate, you could search out the answer...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MojoMojoMojo (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
11. So NATO has nothing to do with Afghanistan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Of course they do - but Obama would be a complete showboater |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democrattotheend (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. They need to put Kerry out there explaining that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. I quite agree - Kerry has been exceptionally good simply stating the truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
beachmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 04:23 PM Response to Original message |
14. Why did Hillary miss the Armed Services Committe hearings on Afghanistan? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 04:35 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Too busy running her campaign? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mags (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 04:33 PM Response to Original message |
16. he said he hasn't had time because he is running for President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monty__ (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
18. Because he's not on the subcommittee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indimuse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
20. I've read the drug |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC