This is merely my opinion.
Mrs. Clinton is showing us beyond the shadow of doubt that she intends to take this to the convention floor, regardless of her opponent's lead in pledged delegates, his lead in the popular vote and his lead in number of states he has won.
It is a very ugly turn of events for our party. Her campaign's choice to take this vindictive, self-serving approach also diminishes Mrs. Clinton's standing as a Senator from NY.
But most critically, Clinton's actions guarantee a bitter, protracted and expensive fight over superdelegates' loyalty and threaten to splinter the Democratic Party, notwithstanding the powder kegs called Florida and Michigan.
The radical right uses Hillary Clinton as a battering ram against our Party.
Limbaugh ramps up his 'vote Hillary' campaign because 'nobody hates Obama yet', March 4, 2008
Here's the plan, according to conservative radio show giant Rush Limbaugh:
"Vote Hillary!"
"The strategy is to continue the chaos in this party," Limbaugh said on his show yesterday, adding to the pitch he made Friday on Fox News Channel. "Look, there's a reason for this. Our side isn't going to do this. Obama needs to be bloodied up. Look, half the country already hates Hillary. That's good. But nobody hates Obama yet. Hillary is going to be the one to have to bloody him up politically because our side isn't going to do it. Mark my words. It's about winning, folks!"
And John McCain waits, just like a spider.
Mrs. Clinton is a weak candidate against McCain. She cannot distinguish herself from McCain/Bush in her Iraq War vote, her Patriot Act vote or her vote to declare Iran's Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. She cannot separate herself from McCain on the iron grip that corporate lobbyists have on her.
She cannot separate herself on her approval of NAFTA when her husband signed it into law. Ross Perot was right. NAFTA is the giant sucking sound of our jobs permanently leaving this country. What happened, Ohio?
To use the old adage... why vote for Republican Lite when you can vote for The Maverick?
Instead of telling us how she will lead us out of this colossal Bush destructiveness, she, instead, insists on incinerating her opponents, feeding a raw ambition arising from a sense of entitlement to the office the presidency, and fueled by the win-at-all-costs of her conservative DLC roots.
We already know the Republican battle we face.
Now we see the more immediate battle, which is the bloody onslaught of the last throes of the DLC. This is why she fights so ruthlessly against Obama.Obama represents the people in a way she, steeped in the DLC, will never genuinely master.
I continue to support Albert Gore in a presidential run, but until then, Obama is the best candidate to address the serious trouble that we face now in this country.
Howard Dean, it's time to plan primaries/caucuses for Florida and Michigan.