Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Amazingly stupid, sexist column in WaPo today!! ("How Dumb Can We Get?")

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 12:56 PM
Original message
Amazingly stupid, sexist column in WaPo today!! ("How Dumb Can We Get?")
I'm posting this here, because it does discuss women's behavior re: the candidates -- basically, that women who support Obama act like Beatles fans, and that Clinton has run a terrible campaign cuz women just are "kind of dim."

The final paragraph:

So I don't understand why more women don't relax, enjoy the innate abilities most of us possess (as well as the ones fewer of us possess) and revel in the things most important to life at which nearly all of us excel: tenderness toward children and men and the weak and the ability to make a house a home. (Even I, who inherited my interior-decorating skills from my Bronx Irish paternal grandmother, whose idea of upgrading the living-room sofa was to throw a blanket over it, can make a house a home.) Then we could shriek and swoon and gossip and read chick lit to our hearts' content and not mind the fact that way down deep, we are . . . kind of dim.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022902992.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Or perhaps her "problems" are related to this:
I read this today, over at Talking Points Memo:

"Granted, Hillary entered the game confronting some intrinsic challenges. One is that she's a woman. There are those who would argue that this creates an unfair and impossible obstacle for her. How can any woman display the toughness that makes a credible Commander in Chief without also being pegged as an abrasive shrew?

Before long, a woman will come along who is equipped to use her gender as a point of strength. A woman who taps naturally into all the positive feelings people have towards the powerful and influential women in their lives. Voters will defend this woman when she's attacked as if their own sister were under assault. And they will bend to her will to avoid disappointing her, out of an almost holy respect, as they do for their mothers. Such a woman will come along, but it appears her name will not be Hillary Clinton. "

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/hillarys-cards-obamas-deal.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caoimhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clap trap that I'm sure appeals to the Ann Coulter crowd
I think Gloria Steinem was the one who said "If you aren't a feminist, you're a masochist"

We have come so far and yet at the same time, things haven't changed in the minds of self-loathing women.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh my God, where did they FIND this Phyllis Schlafly wannabe throwback?
This "You know, we women are all pretty damn stupid. Except me" person.

Even arguing the evo-psych crap and the "men's brains are bigger than women's" stuff to support her argument that females, with the exception of a few "outliers," are all featherheaded flibbertigibbets who would rather do nothing all day but sit around watching Oprah, eating bonbons, listening to Celine Dion, reading bodice-ripper novels, and swooning over politicians (because Lord knows, when they say a politician inspires them and makes them feel hopeful, it really just means they Got a Crush On Obama, right?).

Send this one back to the nineteenth century! And hurry! :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Incredible, isn't it?
Loved the part about how women faint at Obama rallies from something akin to Beatlemania. People faint at all sorts of rallies and other public events, including other candidates' speeches -- but that didn't fit in with the theme. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let me see if I get this:
Women are less intelligent than men, and women faint when the male candidate talks, so we should vote for the female candidate because she doesn't make women faint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I didn't read it that way at all.
I thought it was about not worrying our dim little heads about such things as politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's the impression I got.
Terrible opinion piece.

As for Hillary -- well, I think her failed campaign is due largely to boobs like Mark Penn, not boobs as in "the gender with breasts."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC