Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cui Bono? OBAMA!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:37 PM
Original message
Cui Bono? OBAMA!
Obama clearly benefits from the whole Somali garb controversy - and this fits perfectly with the "desperate Clinton campaign" theme.

Maggie Williams couldn't deny that ANYONE on Clinton's staff sent the photo... It's been online for months, and Williams just couldn't in good faith prove the negative. But I'd be shocked if this were something that was sanctioned from on high. Prove that, Obamaniacs.

Meanwhile, Obama gets a full news cycle to call Hillary an anti-Muslim racist. That's what's disgusting about the whole thing.

This is clearly a case of Drudge allying with Obama to sink Hillary. You've got to wonder about Obama and Drudge joining forces, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clinton's entire campaign must be a clever plot orchestrated by Obama then
Because everything she does seems to benefit him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wrong. It is a Republican stunt... a double-hit on Clinton and Obama
The Drudge piece hurts Clinton in the primaries in a way that divides the party (racist, negative) and hurts Obama in the general (foreign, muslim).

It's as effective as anything I've seen the Republicans pull lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. then why hasnt the clinton campaign denied it?
stop blaming drudge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Because the Clinton campaign hasn't had time to do an internal investigation!
Geez, it just broke this morning. If it turns out that some low level twerp sent a link to the photo to someone, the Clinton campaign would be righteously accused by Obama disciples of lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. The Clinton Campaign HAS denied it, you MORON
The Clinton Campaign has denied that it was a Clinton Campaign action.

They are unable to say whether any of 700 staffers have ever sent an email with that photo to anyone, but if an individual did, it was not a sanctioned campaign action.

That is a denial, and the only denial that could possibly be offered under the circumstances.

Very simple stuff for people who care about truth, which you clearly do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Their second statement on the affair was less incompetent than the first, yes. The first
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 03:58 PM by Occam Bandage
was only a clumsy attempt to turn this into an attack on Obama; that played to the Taylor Marsh crowd but was otherwise unconvincing. "Yeah, this probably came from us, but we have no idea who or why or how and we totally don't support it" is the line they should have stuck with from the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yeah, the Clinton campaign was caught a little off-guard by Obama-ites playing the race card
Something pops up on Drudge and the Obama-ites fall in line and call Hillary a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It realistically shouldn't take six hours to figure out how to respond to a staffer's fuckup. I'm
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 04:03 PM by Occam Bandage
glad they did, but this was a bad morning for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. 6 hours is pretty good to get to the bottom of something
Conversely, Obama's supporters should have waited before pouncing on Hillary. Bad form.

And I thought Obama was all into unity? Is that all window dressing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. But they didn't; they just said they can't get to the bottom of it. That should have been their
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 04:13 PM by Occam Bandage
first response.

Obama never said he was in favor of treating his political opponents with kid gloves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Then it's politics as usual with Obama. Caveat emptor. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Not at all. He, unlike Clinton and unlike many Republicans,
recognizes that the large group of people who aren't hardcore Republicans or hardcore Democrats also exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. But he needs to rise above these divisive tactics
By smearing Hillary as a racist today, he really hurt the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. I have no problem with a candidate defending himself against smears.
He never called Hillary a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. OK, "shameful, offensive fear-mongering"
Plouffe said in a statement: “On the very day that Senator Clinton is giving a speech about restoring respect for America in the world, her campaign has engaged in the most shameful, offensive fear-mongering we’ve seen from either party in this election. This is part of a disturbing pattern that led her county chairs to resign in Iowa, her campaign chairman to resign in New Hampshire, and it’s exactly the kind of divisive politics that turns away Americans of all parties and diminishes respect for America in the world," said Plouffe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. WHERE IS THE DENIAL???
Link please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bwahahahaha!
You can't be serious! :rofl:


Look, even if Obama were the type to do this sort of thing, given past precedent in the Democratic Party (see: Dukakis in a tank, Kerry windsurfing), the results of the photo are such an unknown that releasing it isn't a politically viable move on the part of the Obama campaign because the fallout cannot be controlled.

Here's another take, though: Conservative ops leak the photo to Drudge, and say they're from Clinton's camp. That way, they win regardless of where the fallout occurs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If it's all a conservative dirty trick, why accuse Hillary of the smear? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Because that way, you make Clinton look like a gutter politician, of course...
while at the same time making Obama look like ... well, like that guy in the photo. You kill two birds with one stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. No, why are Democrats accusing Clinton of the smear???
Unity goes both ways people.

So this is how Obama wants to start? By trashing Hillary Clinton as an anti-Muslim racist? Can't you see that the Republicans are behind this, and the Obama people are falling for it hook, line and sinker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. If it's false, why did she not deny it in her response this morning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Because then it becomes a gotcha game (could have been low-level & unauthorized)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Oh, so now the Republicans ARE behind this? But you just said in your OP it was Obama...
so, which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I said Obama is benefiting from the controversy
By accusing Hillary of being an anti-Muslim racist, he's the one being divisive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. LMAO. Most everything Clinton says benefits Obama. Therefore, he's behind her campaign!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. How do you know Clinton is really behind this???
It could have been an overzealous stamp licker in El Paso sending this thing around!

Why would Clinton associate her campaign with an ugly RW e-mail rumor campaign??? (Answer, she didn't, but Obama wants you to think she did.)

Wake up people!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Apparently Hillary hired good ol' Overzealous Staffer after DeLay stepped down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. !
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyVan Donating Member (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. The only thing I see is someone trying to create division
in the party. Neither campaign trusts the other, and they shouldn't, but the situation makes it easy for a Repub or an outsider to start shit and create infighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Cui bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. How silly and absurd this discussion is...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
34. Reaching, yes, that's the word
Reaching,

Whereas reading this I am ...

Retching :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC