|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:37 PM Original message |
Cui Bono? OBAMA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Clinton's entire campaign must be a clever plot orchestrated by Obama then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. Wrong. It is a Republican stunt... a double-hit on Clinton and Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. then why hasnt the clinton campaign denied it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Because the Clinton campaign hasn't had time to do an internal investigation! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. The Clinton Campaign HAS denied it, you MORON |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Their second statement on the affair was less incompetent than the first, yes. The first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Yeah, the Clinton campaign was caught a little off-guard by Obama-ites playing the race card |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:02 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. It realistically shouldn't take six hours to figure out how to respond to a staffer's fuckup. I'm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. 6 hours is pretty good to get to the bottom of something |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. But they didn't; they just said they can't get to the bottom of it. That should have been their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:14 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Then it's politics as usual with Obama. Caveat emptor. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Not at all. He, unlike Clinton and unlike many Republicans, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:17 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. But he needs to rise above these divisive tactics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. I have no problem with a candidate defending himself against smears. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:24 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. OK, "shameful, offensive fear-mongering" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. WHERE IS THE DENIAL??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. Bwahahahaha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. If it's all a conservative dirty trick, why accuse Hillary of the smear? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Because that way, you make Clinton look like a gutter politician, of course... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. No, why are Democrats accusing Clinton of the smear??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. If it's false, why did she not deny it in her response this morning? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. Because then it becomes a gotcha game (could have been low-level & unauthorized) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Oh, so now the Republicans ARE behind this? But you just said in your OP it was Obama... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I said Obama is benefiting from the controversy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
5. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
6. LMAO. Most everything Clinton says benefits Obama. Therefore, he's behind her campaign! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. How do you know Clinton is really behind this??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Apparently Hillary hired good ol' Overzealous Staffer after DeLay stepped down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BobbyVan (502 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #15 |
35. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thoughtcrime1984 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
8. The only thing I see is someone trying to create division |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
10. Cui bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monmouth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
19. How silly and absurd this discussion is...n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
intaglio (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
34. Reaching, yes, that's the word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC