|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:30 AM Original message |
Did the Teamsters not endorse Hillary Clinton because she's a woman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:34 AM Response to Original message |
1. If they endorsed Clinton, would they not have endorsed Obama because he is black? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. he's a man first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:34 AM Response to Reply #3 |
98. Says who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:41 AM Response to Reply #3 |
102. Where do you get off saying a person's gender is "first" over their race? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #102 |
140. And you're right, people are voting for him because he is black |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #140 |
145. You'd like to be able to criticize blacks for it, but you can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:43 AM Response to Reply #3 |
129. I don't agree at all. He's a BLACK man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
143. Sexism "matters more" than Racism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raydawg1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
146. hahahahahahahahahahahahahah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. The mysogeny in this primary race is far from subtle. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:52 AM Response to Reply #2 |
29. That's becoming more obvious n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:44 AM Response to Reply #2 |
70. Um... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xmas74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:26 AM Response to Reply #70 |
124. And that was rather rude. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:41 AM Response to Reply #124 |
127. Because faux intellectuals spouting fauxminism... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #127 |
150. If people cared about the meaning of words they should've studied Latin or etymology |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:22 AM Response to Reply #2 |
93. This is a joke, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:41 AM Response to Reply #2 |
103. Sp. correction: misogyny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:04 AM Response to Reply #103 |
119. Now, if only Hillary would correct the mis-spelling of her IWR vote. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:37 AM Response to Original message |
4. How did it look to you when they endorsed Ronald Reagan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:40 AM Response to Reply #4 |
9. That they just endorse the man regardless of his principles or lack thereof? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hollowdweller (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:57 AM Response to Reply #9 |
82. No they endorse the one that they think might win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
5. What codswalllop. You provide nothing in the way of evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:40 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Codswallop?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:51 AM Response to Reply #8 |
27. I AM NOT A CLINTONITE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:55 AM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Did you do any research into whether or not the Teamsters have endorsed women in other races? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sendero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:31 AM Response to Reply #27 |
56. Are you going to vote for HRC.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. You have your opinions, I have mine You don't like it ignore me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:48 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. I was going to start my first daily "Sheer Absurdity K&R" award... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:58 AM Original message |
lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:05 AM Response to Original message |
41. I came for the absurdity, and stayed for the codswallop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:50 AM Response to Reply #13 |
77. Create your own forum and let yourself be the only member. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #5 |
131. Stop stealing my catch phrases! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #131 |
132. Are you the attribution-worthy source? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #132 |
142. Um...no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:38 AM Response to Original message |
6. Supporting Obama, then making a signing statement that they totally disagree with Oabma's platform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thesubstanceofdreams (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:40 AM Response to Original message |
7. Saying that anytime someone doesn't favor Hillary is because of misogyny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:47 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. I DON'T DO IT EVERYTIME |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:41 AM Response to Original message |
10. Way to hate unions! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:45 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. You're the one that is injecting the hate pomp here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:52 AM Response to Reply #10 |
28. Way to not contribute to the thread! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:24 AM Response to Reply #28 |
51. A thread that starts by accusing a union of being either bigots or of disenfranchising people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:31 AM Response to Reply #51 |
57. Yup, there was no attempt at objectivity whatsoever here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ObamaFan (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:11 AM Response to Reply #51 |
86. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
11. Oh my god. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. God had nothing to do with it. Please lay your crap to rest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:01 AM Response to Reply #17 |
117. Plagiarizing my lines now are we? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
33. I think you need to change you avatar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:40 AM Response to Reply #33 |
67. Swept under the rug? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:55 AM Response to Reply #33 |
114. This endorsement had absolutely nothing to do with misogyny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:42 AM Response to Reply #11 |
69. No, it's good. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:44 AM Response to Original message |
12. Just maybe they endorsed Pres. Clinton, Gore and Kerry because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goddess40 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
14. It might be the union buster that's running her campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:56 AM Response to Reply #14 |
134. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:45 AM Response to Original message |
16. Or it simply could be that Clinton's support of NAFTA and allowing Mexican trucks to operate here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:47 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Did you even pay attention to the Teamster's signing statement? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:53 AM Response to Reply #21 |
30. No, it would be nice if you had a link though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadHound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:19 AM Response to Reply #21 |
50. I guess you don't have a link to back yourself up with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rjx (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:46 AM Response to Original message |
18. Maybe because Hillary has a dark past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shaniqua6392 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
20. My husband is a Teamster; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maribelle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:54 AM Response to Reply #20 |
31. With all due respect to you and your husband... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:58 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:52 AM Response to Reply #31 |
80. link please. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:20 AM Response to Reply #31 |
92. Seriously, this is some bizarre conspiracy-theory crap you're writing now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 12:56 PM Response to Reply #92 |
139. Or the Illuminati!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:53 AM Response to Reply #31 |
112. OMG ! I second the call for LINK ! LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JustABozoOnThisBus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:29 AM Response to Reply #20 |
55. Self-serving? Our union? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #20 |
141. Wow, thanks for that n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:48 AM Response to Original message |
23. Like SEIU, I think they just want to be seen as backing the winner. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:50 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. I which case they are also evil according to the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:59 AM Response to Reply #25 |
35. No, it's not evil. Just practical. I wish women would stop this misogyny BS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:01 AM Response to Reply #35 |
38. If it's a non issue then you have no problem moving on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:02 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Nope. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:14 AM Response to Reply #35 |
47. Several weeks ago, I posted a link to a story about unions holding back their endorsements this ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:25 AM Response to Reply #47 |
52. My own union, the NEA has yet to endorse a candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:27 AM Response to Reply #52 |
53. The article was a top-tier outlet, and really delved into why union leaders... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:28 AM Response to Reply #52 |
54. See #48 below: Teamsters endorsed Gov. Jennifer Granholm of Michigan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:54 AM Response to Reply #35 |
113. They won't stop, unfortunately. Its one of the only things they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:17 AM Response to Reply #113 |
120. This is the GREAT BIG SILVER LINING of Hillary's stubborn losing campaign... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:00 AM Response to Reply #23 |
36. Well, I think that's a part of it too.Thanks at least for a civil adult response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:49 AM Response to Reply #36 |
76. Do you think Jennifer Granholm looked their endorsement in the mouth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DiverDave (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
24. oh, bullshit, so they didn't endorse her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goddess40 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 06:51 AM Response to Original message |
26. Or it could be that Terry McAuliffe threw that last two Presidents under the bus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GumboYaYa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:00 AM Response to Original message |
37. No, it was because she is losing badly and it is almost a certainy that she will lose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:01 AM Response to Original message |
39. I don't get the disenfranchisement factor in a union endorsement, who are the victims? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
42. IMO, no. The endorsement was not gender-specific. The Teamsters also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JTFrog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:06 AM Response to Original message |
43. JFC. She is a horrible politician and is running a horrible and nasty campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
44. I don't see anything about NAFTA here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:09 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Policy concerns? No way! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:32 AM Response to Reply #46 |
58. I hope that is sarcasm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:35 AM Response to Reply #58 |
62. I have no fight with the Teamsters, but some here do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal N proud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:52 AM Response to Reply #62 |
79. I don't think they were either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
45. They didn't endorse her because she isn't a viable candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:17 AM Response to Original message |
48. Teamsters ENDORSE Jennifer Granholm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:33 AM Response to Reply #48 |
59. You beat me to it -- Yes they have endorsed many women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:34 AM Response to Reply #59 |
60. - - - - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Armstead (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:35 AM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Back at ya |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:37 AM Response to Reply #59 |
65. See #32 upthread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texas_indy (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:58 AM Response to Reply #59 |
83. Much easier to play the "victim/sexism" card than to do actual research and fact finding. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:11 AM Response to Reply #83 |
87. Scientific Method. Not just for dead white guys anymore. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ObamaFan (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:16 AM Response to Reply #48 |
89. Oh my...Imagine that.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:25 AM Response to Reply #89 |
94. Yeah. Facts. Inconvenient truths. You know. Orthodoxy exploders. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
49. It's a legitimate question worthy of legitimate discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #49 |
138. Thank you for your response, and I will definitely be taking your advice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:34 AM Response to Original message |
61. No, here's why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:46 AM Response to Reply #61 |
72. But doesn't Hoffa moonlight as the Master Mason Misogynist on Mondays? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
64. Or perhaps Hill has no where near the charisma or likeability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:47 AM Response to Reply #64 |
74. Or maybe the Teamsters felt they were "more than square" with the Clintons already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:52 AM Response to Reply #74 |
81. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:15 AM Response to Reply #81 |
88. No. No. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BoneDaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:45 AM Response to Reply #88 |
108. Hehe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
66. Another Candidate for Stupidest GDP Post Of the Day! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:41 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. But it sure has its value, nevertheless. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:45 AM Response to Original message |
71. The Teamsters' endorsement is here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
73. To answer your question, probably. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrah_G (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:47 AM Response to Original message |
75. I don't think so. I think they simply preffered Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent-Voter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
78. HRC - always the victim. Maybe they didn't endose b/c she lost the last 10 states by 17% or more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:42 AM Response to Reply #78 |
105. If they give her a "Participant" ribbon, will it all be OK? Milk and cookies for everybody! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
84. Did the Teamsters endorse Barack Obama because they're gay? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
85. It is sexist to say that anyone not endorsing HRC is sexist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:17 AM Response to Reply #85 |
90. Thank you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent-Voter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:33 AM Response to Reply #90 |
97. It's not. A few shrill old-school feminists do not a movement make. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:40 AM Response to Reply #97 |
100. Agreed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:45 AM Response to Reply #97 |
107. Oh Ouch !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:55 PM Response to Reply #97 |
152. Nope, no misogyny around here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RestoreGore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #85 |
137. Did I say ANYONE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
91. That depends on what you mean I guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
95. Another day... another post claiming sexism for the reason that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:33 AM Response to Original message |
96. O you artists, you workers of oil and watercolor, you sculptors of stone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:46 AM Response to Reply #96 |
109. I have this from a thread where she's compared to jesus. not much, but a start |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:48 AM Response to Reply #109 |
110. the "INRI" overtop, as the British joke goes, stands for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rndmprsn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
99. more likely becase she's a boring loser... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
101. 30% of teamsters are women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:42 AM Response to Reply #101 |
104. ...and only 15% of Teamsters are black |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ObamaFan (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:00 AM Response to Reply #104 |
116. James Hoffa and Bill Clinton: The Dinner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:43 AM Response to Reply #101 |
106. Yeah, but those women are only kept by the Teamsters for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:52 AM Response to Original message |
111. New Defense: If you don't endorse Hillary - it's because you're sexist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 08:56 AM Response to Reply #111 |
115. Oh, that's been the Meme all along. I'm surprised you haven't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:27 AM Response to Reply #115 |
125. Ironic, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
118. You guys are getting desperate in the playing of the sex card. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ObamaFan (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:22 AM Response to Reply #118 |
121. Clinton campaign to be studied for years to come... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #118 |
130. So true. It really is pathetic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thatsrightimirish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
122. They didn't endorse Kerry in the primary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:25 AM Response to Reply #122 |
123. John Kerry was a woman? Who knew? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
126. They joined the Obama bandwagon. Hoffa preferred Edwards but didn't endorse him because of poll #'s |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yurem2008 (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:42 AM Response to Reply #126 |
128. No, because she is a LOSER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 11:46 AM Response to Reply #128 |
136. What principle! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoxFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
133. Damn misogynists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EndElectoral (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
135. N-A-F-T-A....ask any trucker how they feel about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LadyVT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
144. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
COFoothills (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
147. Has nothing to do with her plumbing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
148. Wow, you're wrong on so many levels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raydawg1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
149. Heres why...................... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
151. What a silly argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doni_georgia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-21-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
153. They didn't endorse Clinton because of NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC