Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seriously, does Hillary C have a death wish with her new campaign manager?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:29 PM
Original message
Seriously, does Hillary C have a death wish with her new campaign manager?
Seems like a very stupid move.

WASHINGTON (March 5) -- Democratic fund-raiser Johnny Chung has agreed to plead guilty to election law violations and cooperate in the ongoing Justice Department investigation into illegal campaign fund-raising in the 1996 elections.

Chung's attorney Brian Sun said in a statement released to CNN, "Mr. Chung has reached an agreement with the government. Mr. Chung wants to put this matter behind him as quickly as possible. He and his family are looking forward to getting on with their lives."

Chung became a major figure in the Democratic fund-raising scandal when it was learned he made almost 50 visits to the White House. During one visit, Chung gave first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton's then-chief of staff, Maggie Williams, a $50,000 check for the Democratic National Committee (DNC). The check was delivered inside the White House.

Two days later Chung was able to bring a group of Chinese businessmen to watch President Bill Clinton deliver a radio address in the Oval Office. They then had their picture taken with the president.

The DNC returned more than $300,000 that Chung raised because of questions about the source of the money.
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/03/05/chung.pleads /


January 08, 2008 8:46 PM

ABC News' Kate Snow reports that Maggie Williams, the former chief of staff for then-First Lady Hillary Clinton, will take control of Clinton's presidential campaign.

Not to cast aspersions at what I'm sure will prove to be an astute hire....but I can't be the only one who remembers that Williams had a role in those late-90s campaign finance scandals.

She's the one who took the $50,000 donation from Johnny Chung. And Chung claimed she solicited the contribution at the White House (which the White House denied.)

Moreover, last November, Williams was cited in a New York Times story about the huge figure -- $30 million -- Clinton spent on being re-elected to the US Senate while facing nominal opposition. Many donors were concerned that the campaign had become a way for consultants to become wealthy.

Wrote the Times: "A close friend of Mrs. Clinton, Maggie Williams, received a $37,500 consulting fee, paid to her firm, Griffin Williams Critical Point Management, at the end of July.

"Asked what the payment was for, Mrs. Clinton's campaign aides checked and subsequently responded that the payment had been a mistake. They said it should have been for less than $5,000 to reimburse Ms. Williams, who served as chief of staff to Mrs. Clinton in the White House, for travel costs. They said Ms. Williams would return the extra money. Ms. Williams, who was said by Mrs. Clinton's aides to be traveling, did not return a call to her office."


http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/01/welcome...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting.
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nothing to see here...
move along folks.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. I will be watching to see if anyone else picks this up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow.
Not very smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I have to say that I am STUNNED by this move. She really isn't as savvy as they say.
Edited on Sun Feb-10-08 09:40 PM by Windy
I guess my serious concerns regarding her judgment are once again supported by the evidence.
Even it the allegations are untrue, which based upon everything I've read, isn't the case, she personally put that speck of dirt out there that reminds people of all the allegations of corruption that surrounded the Clinton presidency.

I am truly aghast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Meet Maggie Williams, Hillary Clinton's New Campaign Manager -Here"
Forum Name General Discussion: Primaries
Topic subject Meet Maggie Williams, Hillary Clinton's New Campaign Manager
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4528912#4528912
4528912, Meet Maggie Williams, Hillary Clinton's New Campaign Manager
Posted by bigtree on Sun Feb-10-08 07:27 PM



Born and reared in Kansas City, MO, Williams graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Trinity College in Washington in 1977 and received a master's degree at the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg School for Communications. She has worked for the Children's Defense Fund and once served as press secretary for Sen. Robert Torricelli (D-NJ).

As the first Black woman to direct the operations of the first lady in the White House, Maggie Williams quickly found herself smack in the middle of the republican war on the Clintons.

from Ruth Marcus' 1994 article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/08/AR2008010803378_pf.html

"I had been saying to anyone who would listen that I believed Whitewater was a distraction from the president's agenda, and I did not understand how 17 years of Arkansas history was related to feeding people, clothing people, giving people health care," Williams said. "I was outspoken; I said that; I said it over and over."

In a White House with a different and more powerful First Lady, Williams (was) a different and more powerful chief of staff. She (held) the title of assistant to the president -- on a par with other senior staffers and, in the title-conscious White House, a significant notch higher than her predecessors in the job.

"Her job is huge," said one official, pointing to Williams's three-part role as a major player on health reform, administrator of the First Lady's staff and overseer of White House social functions. "No First Lady's chief of staff has ever had this kind of job."

While a sizable share of Williams's power derives from the importance of her boss, she also plays a wider role than the specific issues facing the First Lady because of what numerous White House officials describe(d) as her overall good judgment, particularly on communications issues.

Williams, at then-White House Chief of Staff Thomas F. "Mack" McLarty's direction, was the principal author earlier (that) summer of a major memorandum on White House reorganization. McLarty said he and his successor as chief of staff, Leon E. Panetta, (had) asked Williams to prepare periodic reviews of the 30-, 60- and 90-day outlooks for the White House.

"The best way to describe her is her title," said communications director Mark Gearan. "She is both assistant to the president and chief of staff to the First Lady."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Nice resume, yes, but if you dont think this past scandal won't come to light, you're nuts! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. and this isn't the first time I've thought this too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bright Eyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's not the best choice.
Not by a long shot. Even if the allegations are untrue, the GOP is sure to tear into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Another day - another smear by the media as they promote Obama and tear down Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. facts are facts Paupau and noone forced her to chose this women this far into the campaign!
Not a good move on Clinton's part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-10-08 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sometimes I wonder if the Clintons are just in public service to build
themselves and their hangers-on a giant money machine. Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC