Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michigan Dems allocate delegates to Clinton, uncommitted

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:45 PM
Original message
Michigan Dems allocate delegates to Clinton, uncommitted
by The Associated Press
Friday February 08, 2008, 4:50 PM

LANSING — Hillary Rodham Clinton will get the lion's share of Democratic national convention delegates after winning the state's Jan. 15 presidential primary.

The Michigan Democratic Party said Friday that Clinton will get 73 pledged delegates after winning 55 percent of the statewide vote.

Another 55 delegates will be uncommitted since 40 percent of the Democratic voters chose uncommitted. Because Barack Obama and John Edwards had taken their names off the ballot, many of their supporters voted for uncommitted.

The state also has 28 superdelegates, many of whom remain uncommitted, for a total of 156.

Michigan has been stripped of its delegates for moving up its primary, but party leaders expect the delegates to be seated at the national convention.


http://www.mlive.com/elections/index.ssf/2008/02/michigan_dems_allocated_delega.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds fair
Its up to them and it sounds like they made a fair decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. So it looks like the superdelegates aren't even buying the 'HIllary won' argument.
They'd be pledging to her if they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, but their seats are in Nebraska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. that's not right. Hers was the only name on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Not true
four names were on the ballot. Those that weren't on it CHOSE to withdraw their names.

But don't let facts get in the way of making shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. a show of solidarity with your party is a bad thing?

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/02/08/michigans_missed_moment_as_cli.html?hpid=topnews

"Clinton won both Michigan and Florida handily. She won Michigan in part because Obama and other Democrats took their names off the ballot in solidarity with the DNC and as part of a pledge made to Iowa, New Hampshire and other early states not to participate in unsanctioned contests."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I didn't say it was good or bad
I said Clinton wasn't the only name on the MI ballot, which is an indisputable fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. You implied that they should not have done what the DNC said /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Once wind of this catches fire...
It may work against Hillary in a big way.

Many. many will see this as unfair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. If they seat those delegates without rerunning the election, and she wins
the nomination because of it, SHE WILL LOSE THE GENERAL ELECTION

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes, and - the Dems would lose many Dems
Edited on Fri Feb-08-08 09:30 PM by RiverStone
who would say fuck it to the party establishment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. They chose it because the DNC told them to. You will see a whole bunch of people NOT vote
in the general election for President if they seat MI and FL

The ONLY acceptable solution is to rerun the primary or don't seat the delegates

If she wins the nomination without having the election rerun, they WILL lose the general election


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndieLeft Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Those delegates will not be seated.
the DNC has said no, and last I checked, the MDP did not have authority over the DNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. If they want me to vote in the Presidential Election they better not
The only other acceptable solution for me would be to re-run the primary


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. They will not count toward picking a nominee.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamaniac Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Look, this won't happen
No amount of Clintonian crying will change that.

For this to happen, we will essentially be punishing Obama for playing by the rules and rewarding Clinton for breaking them.

NO. FUCKING. WAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. If that happens, and she wins the nomination because of that, she loses the general election
They had better think hard and clear on that. The ONLY acceptable solution is to re-run the primary or not seat them

If they don't do one of those choices, and she wins the nomination because the other candidates were told NOT to run in MI and Florida, here is one person who WILL NOT VOTE IN THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE IN THE GENERAL ELECTION

and I don't think I will be alone


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I feel the same way it would be an unfair race
and i wouldn't vote for her either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. I Will be at home with the rest of you if they seat them without do over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. The solution is so DAMN SIMPLE, just rerun the election, then there is no problem /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC