|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 PM Original message |
FUCK YOU NY POST!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. You're weird. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. No, Obama supporters just lost one of their favorite anti-Hillary talking points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. It was good for me. :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
18. It's true....when they pull that knife, Clinton's supporters can pull that endorsement GUN! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duke Newcombe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
30. Fresh from the field, just for you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
55. I see this particular endorsement as a BLESSING, actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. Dupe. sorry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maximusveritas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
61. How's that? Murdoch knows this will hurt Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
65. It's not an Obama endorsement and you are smart enough to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:50 PM Response to Reply #65 |
74. You seem to be the only smart one around...is it lonely for you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
73. Dang! They need to make another one. Or no, this is a reverse psychology endorsement! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nimrod2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 PM Original message |
Why is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why is that a problem for you?? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Seal of approval from Murdoch and Company. THat Rag endorsing Obama helps nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
41. Is that how the campaign sees it?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
52. Sorry, Murdoch supports Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:02 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. Not any more....she's too far to the left for Rupert, apparently!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
60. Not true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nedsdag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. Why are you surprised? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:37 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. No kidding... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. He is constantly inviting Republicans to vote for him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. Great endorsement! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. lol n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
37. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #7 |
47. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rolleitreks (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #7 |
53. It goes a little easy on the Clintons, but makes the right choice. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
9. Brilliant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southern_dem (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:38 PM Response to Original message |
11. Who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rox63 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
14. They're probably only doing because the NY Times endorsed HRC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:39 PM Response to Original message |
15. Deliciously ironic considering the Obama supporters' talking point that Hillary is Murdoch's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:16 PM Response to Reply #15 |
67. She is his candidate. This is not an Obama endorsement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. David Shuster just said it's a slap in the face to the Clinton campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Strong (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:47 PM Original message |
If THAT'S the Post's idea of a slap in Hillary's face... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #17 |
68. Then David Shuster is a shill for the Clinton campaign or a complete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Strong (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
20. In the words of McDonald's latest ad campaign: "I'm lovin' it." n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
21. It would be different if Obama hadn't gotten the backing of every major newspaper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
39. Jesus, you really DON'T read at ALL, do you? The POST endorsed your FELLAH!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #39 |
50. No, you didn't get what I was saying...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. No, they MEAN it. He's got the corporate attitude they like, apparently. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #50 |
71. You are spinning this to favor your guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
22. And this suprises you how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
23. i saw that and had a good belly laugh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
24. Who gives a rats ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
25. Well, I'm glad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
26. Shuster just said Hillary was heavily courting the paper for their endorsement. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Rinaldo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:47 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Probably, but she was too much of a leftist for them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:50 PM Response to Reply #26 |
38. Of course she was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #38 |
54. I did not know that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:00 PM Response to Reply #38 |
56. I did not know that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
27. Chill, bro. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
28. k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catherine Vincent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
29. Where's that goon that always posts the Murdoch/Clinton pic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. I think we'll be seeing a lot less of that picture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #29 |
43. Heh, heh...the retort is Murdoch's endorsement! Gotta LOVE it! NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:47 PM Response to Original message |
31. Whatever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
33. Could be worse. Could have been the NY Sun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
34. He earned it honestly. Congrats!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandem5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
35. now for the national enquirer - what say you? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
40. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. It is delicious, isn't it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #44 |
57. sluuurp, yes, very much so. It's more funny than anything, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:53 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. i know. almost makes me cry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemExpat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #40 |
62. Hilarious. Politics can be such entertaining theater! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
42. Bwahahahahahaha! I think it's hilarious. That's who the repukes want to run against. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
totodeinhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #42 |
75. No, they want to run against Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
in_cog_ni_to (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. LOL...that's funny. They are foaming at the mouth to run against Barack. Mark my words. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
45. hnmnf, tone it down a bit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goldcanyonaz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM Response to Original message |
46. K & R Did you read it? It's an AWESOME endorsement. GoBAMA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
49. And I can just imagine your reaction if they'd endorsed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
51. OUCH! Is this reverse Murdoch strategery? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scriptor Ignotus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
63. NY POST = National Enquirer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dorian Gray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
64. Why is that bullshit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
66. CONGRADULATIONS OBAMA SUPPORTERS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:17 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClericJohnPreston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:20 PM Response to Original message |
70. Bwahahahahahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
72. hnmnf, I give you my most sincere regards on this wonderful endorsement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beacool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-31-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
77. Well, well, well, wonders never cease!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC