Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FUCK YOU NY POST!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 PM
Original message
FUCK YOU NY POST!!!
Endorsing Obama, Fucking Bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. You're weird. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. No, Obama supporters just lost one of their favorite anti-Hillary talking points
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 04:36 PM by Tom Rinaldo
That's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. It was good for me. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. It's true....when they pull that knife, Clinton's supporters can pull that endorsement GUN! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Fresh from the field, just for you...


Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #30
55. I see this particular endorsement as a BLESSING, actually.
It has no downside at all. For CLINTON, that is.

If you think the Senator from New York is going to lose NY, you may as well dry those grapes up into raisins and smoke them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Dupe. sorry
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM by MADem
It IS funny enough to say twice, but I didn't intend it!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maximusveritas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
61. How's that? Murdoch knows this will hurt Obama
The NY Post is hated among those most likely to vote in the Democratic primary. So this endorsement will hurt Obama and help Hillary. Murdoch is smart enough to know this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
65. It's not an Obama endorsement and you are smart enough to
realize that. It's just more manipulative crap from the Clinton/Murdoch Machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #65
74. You seem to be the only smart one around...is it lonely for you?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
73. Dang! They need to make another one. Or no, this is a reverse psychology endorsement!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nimrod2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 PM
Original message
Why is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why is that a problem for you?? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Seal of approval from Murdoch and Company. THat Rag endorsing Obama helps nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
41. Is that how the campaign sees it??
Haven't heard anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
52. Sorry, Murdoch supports Hillary.
Not much doubt about that


<---"thanks a lot, suckers!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. Not any more....she's too far to the left for Rupert, apparently!!!
He's found himself a new love, closer to his philosophies.....

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
60. Not true
First of all, Hillary would give her right arm for this endorsement. Second, the working class vote in New York is owned by Hillary and this gives Obama an entry. Get a grip. We're talking about VOTES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nedsdag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow!
Is this true?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why are you surprised?
The rethugs love Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. No kidding...
I thought that was considered a big bonus, his appeal to right-wingers...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. He is constantly inviting Republicans to vote for him
and his surragates explain how he will seek unity with Republicans. Why shouldn't Murdoch endorse him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yup
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 04:41 PM by jackson_dem
Obama is someone looking to cut a deal first with the rethugs for the sake of unity. Hillary is more of a fighter. If there is going to be a Democrat in the White House Obama is the best bet for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. Great endorsement!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. lol n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
37. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
47. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rolleitreks Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
53. It goes a little easy on the Clintons, but makes the right choice. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. Brilliant
Are they really? lol I bet it's going to be like that Reno Journal endorsement. "We endorse Obama because Hillary is a nightmare."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Who cares?
They're just trying to be different from the NYT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
14. They're probably only doing because the NY Times endorsed HRC
And you know what Murdoch thinks of the NYT,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. Deliciously ironic considering the Obama supporters' talking point that Hillary is Murdoch's
candidate of choice. I guess now we know who the right REALLY wants to take on in November (well that was the argument the Obama supporters made when they though Murdoch was behind Hillary).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
67. She is his candidate. This is not an Obama endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
17. David Shuster just said it's a slap in the face to the Clinton campaign
because she'd been courting them. :shrug: I'll take any endorsement, thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Strong Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:47 PM
Original message
If THAT'S the Post's idea of a slap in Hillary's face...
...I'd sure like to see them PISS in it.

lol

Barack Obama: NY POST APPROVED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
68. Then David Shuster is a shill for the Clinton campaign or a complete
idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Strong Donating Member (334 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. In the words of McDonald's latest ad campaign: "I'm lovin' it." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. It would be different if Obama hadn't gotten the backing of every major newspaper
in the country save the New York Times.

When comparing Hillary to Obama, they all come to the same conclusion.

That's a plus.

Me thinks that the Post in underestimating the skinny guy with the funny name who, by all calculation, should not be standing where he is.

Let them all continue to underestimate the power of this man and his message to the generation of the 21st Century....who have been waiting since the year 2000 to actually enter into the current century.

NY Post can do as it did....it doesn't delute the actual life and work and words of this man. period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
39. Jesus, you really DON'T read at ALL, do you? The POST endorsed your FELLAH!!!
They are IN YOUR CORNER....FAUX SNOOZE's Rupert Murdoch and Company have endorsed Obama!! So why are you whining NOW????

    Me thinks that the Post in underestimating the skinny guy with the funny name who, by all calculation, should not be standing where he is.

    Let them all continue to underestimate the power of this man and his message to the generation of the 21st Century....who have been waiting since the year 2000 to actually enter into the current century.

    NY Post can do as it did....it doesn't delute the actual life and work and words of this man. period.

    :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #39
50. No, you didn't get what I was saying......
Which is, whether the NY Post is attempting psyche op, it doesn't matter.....as whether they are endorsing Obama and why (some will say its because they want him to win so that he can then lose)doesn't compute. Obama will not lose in the GE....which is the part in where they are underestimating OBama....if they think so.

You see, we can all appeal to the worse in us, and continue to believe that Obama cannot win in the GE because he is Black and branded "inexperienced".....but I believe that he can....and I have a "case" made to back my shit up.

SO keep laughing....till you are crying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. No, they MEAN it. He's got the corporate attitude they like, apparently.
He's not for health care for ALL, just for 'most.'

If they're playing a mind game, this is a new trick, because they've never so done before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #50
71. You are spinning this to favor your guy.
It's a pathetic spin at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. And this suprises you how?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. i saw that and had a good belly laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
24. Who gives a rats ass
every paper will endorse one from each side. A rag like the post, honestly, who gives a shit what it's got to say. Even the sports section sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Well, I'm glad
That's the paper people read on the subways and buses and ferry on the way to work. I was more hoping for the Daily News, but this isn't bad, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. Shuster just said Hillary was heavily courting the paper for their endorsement. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Probably, but she was too much of a leftist for them
"Finally, Sen. Clinton stands philosophically far to the left of her husband, and is much more disciplined in pursuit of her agenda."

Can't have any of that. She never stood a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. Of course she was
The Post readership is her blue collar vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
54. I did not know that!
Thanks for the info. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #38
56. I did not know that!
Thanks for the info. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
27. Chill, bro.
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 04:43 PM by jefferson_dem
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

This endorsement may help in NY. I'll take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. Where's that goon that always posts the Murdoch/Clinton pic?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. I think we'll be seeing a lot less of that picture
giggle.

This has been a good week to be a Clinton supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
43. Heh, heh...the retort is Murdoch's endorsement! Gotta LOVE it! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
31. Whatever.
They'll endorse the repuke in the fall, and regardless of who his paper endorsed, Murdoch still donated to HRC's campaign.

http://www.newsmeat.com/billionaire_political_donations/Rupert_Murdoch.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
33. Could be worse. Could have been the NY Sun
Ever seen that litter box liner? They'll probably endorse Guiliani. Even after he dropped out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
34. He earned it honestly. Congrats!!!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :pals: :pals: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
35. now for the national enquirer - what say you? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
40. lol
This is so funny seeing NY's rightwing rag, the Post, going for Obama. Poetic justice :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. It is delicious, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #44
57. sluuurp, yes, very much so. It's more funny than anything, though
hnmnf's reaction to the big news is priceless. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. i know. almost makes me cry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
62. Hilarious. Politics can be such entertaining theater!
lol :D

DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
42. Bwahahahahahaha! I think it's hilarious. That's who the repukes want to run against.
:rofl::rofl::rofl: This endorsement is the funniest thing I've seen all day.:rofl: They deserve each other...Obama and the Post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #42
75. No, they want to run against Clinton.
The Repukes are really afraid of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. LOL...that's funny. They are foaming at the mouth to run against Barack. Mark my words.
They-can't-wait. Too bad they'll never get the chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
45. hnmnf, tone it down a bit.
You're making me worried about you.

Deep breaths, it's all good. Our guy's gonna make it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
46. K & R Did you read it? It's an AWESOME endorsement. GoBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
49. And I can just imagine your reaction if they'd endorsed
the Queen and someone posted a thread just like this one about it. Jesus H. Christ, people, it's time to grow the fuck up and act like adults instead of turning on each other and tearing each other apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
51. OUCH! Is this reverse Murdoch strategery? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scriptor Ignotus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
63. NY POST = National Enquirer
it's trash. might have a marginal positive effect for Obama, but I wouldn't read too much into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
64. Why is that bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
66. CONGRADULATIONS OBAMA SUPPORTERS!
This is truely a GREAT DAY for all of you!
I want to send you my most sincere regards on this wonderful endorsement. We at the Hillary camp know that Obama has earned this endorsement! Good luck!

:toast: :party::toast: :party::toast: :party::toast: :party::toast: :party::toast: :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. Thank you
I know Hillary wanted it, but alas..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
70. Bwahahahahahahaha
couldn't happen to a nicer Obamaton, hmnnf. Aren't you the people who always push "bi-partisanship".

Glad to see Obama's bi-partisanship has reached out and found the Rethug scum CORPORATE base. It's no surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
72. hnmnf, I give you my most sincere regards on this wonderful endorsement.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
77. Well, well, well, wonders never cease!!!!
Murdoch's rag endorsed Obama? That's way too funny for words!!!!! What do the Obama fans, who repeatedly bashed Hillary for her Murdoch fundraiser, think of this turn of events?????

Karma is a bitch......


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

P.S. I think Hillary still prefers the Times' endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC