The leader, Clinton, has an Edwards tribute up on the website. Has Obama followed her lead yet?

[Proud2BAmurkin]

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/

[RL3AO]

1. The only guy that knows HTML probably called in sick.

:)

[Proud2BAmurkin]

4. or he's out giving campaign speeches

[DUyellow]

40. It was nice that Obama waited until John was done with his speech... one way to look at it...

Give me a break, you guys are all full of it. Who is the first to do this... who is the first to do that... grow up

[MrCoffee]

2. The campaign's body isn't even cold, and she's already dancing on the grave?

Fuckin' excellent.

Don't ask me to support her. I won't do it.

[maddezmom]

8. both campaign have a tribute

http://www.barackobama.com/index.php

[Proud2BAmurkin]

I won't. There are a certain number of "anybody but Clinton" in the Edwards ranks

That's cool

[MrCoffee]

They both suck equally.

[Occam Bandage]

12. I think "OMG HIS SUPPORT IS HILLARY'S NOW" threads are grave-dancing.

[emilyg]

21. Obama has one, too. Kiss my grits.

[maddezmom]

3. yes he has put something similar up now

http://www.barackobama.com/index.php

[MonkeyFunk]

5. yes he has

grow up

[Occam Bandage]

6. Were you unable to type "barackobama.com" yourself?

[aein]

7. Obama is really bad at HTML!

[tabatha]

9. It is very classy - it looks as though it took more than 5 mins to put up.

http://www.barackobama.com/index.php

[Proud2BAmurkin]

11. They're photoshoped in front of Obama's color scheme. Tacky.

[Occam Bandage]

15. Obama took down the splash. Classy. Hillary left her fundraising splash up.

And Hillary just has a stock photo of the two with some "we salute" in a generic font. Obama made it look nice.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

25. what are you talking about? There wasn't a fundraising pitch and the first thing at Obama's is

a black and white picture of him and sign up pitch

[Occam Bandage]

28. Clear your cache and delete cookies. You probably missed it the first time.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

30. I saw it after I clicked through. They pasted The Edwards's on to an Obama logo

[Occam Bandage]

31. So the color blue is now "an Obama logo?" LOL.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

34. No it's a light Obama blue with a flag at the bottom like your avatar

[Occam Bandage]

37. It's blue, and there's a flag on it. Like the rest of his site. OMG COHESIVE WEB DESIGN IS EVIL.

[eleny]

17. You have to get past Hillary's "support" screen first. Tacky comes to mind.

[calmblueocean]

18. Haha... I gotta admit, your pettiness makes me laugh sometimes. You sure are dedicated to Hil.

It's not enough that Obama has a tribute up, you have to say that the *color scheme* is tacky!

That is just too funny! That's the best meaningless criticism I've heard this entire campaign.

Thanks for the giggle.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

35. But really if you think about it, pasting him on an Obama logo says something doesn't it

not earth shattering but it does say something don't you think

[Occam Bandage]

39. It's not a logo (again, misusing terminology) and all it says is Obama has competent web designers.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

41. It's not competent if it looks like they are vulturing by trying to meld Edwards with Obama's logo

[Occam Bandage]

43. The color blue is not a logo. It's basic web design.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

46. It's Obama blue with a WAVY FLAG at the bottom. Like your avatar.

[Occam Bandage]

48. Yes, like the rest of his site. That is called "web design." It makes everything look cohesive.

You're only digging yourself deeper.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

54. Even if that was all there was to it, which I don't agree it is, why would they

try to make sure the Edwards look "pretty" instead of just posting the damn picture

[Occam Bandage]

56. I can't imagine why they would want their site to be visually appealing, no.

:eyes:

[Proud2BAmurkin]

60. You don't like the photo on the Clinton page?

[Occam Bandage]

65. It's fine. I prefer the Obama layout, but that's just a matter of preference.

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

19. You're compassion for Edwards is tangible.

You're a real class act.

[goodhue]

10. did you look?

It was up there about half an hour ago when I last looked

[rodeodance]

13. yes, saw it a few hours already. Lovely photo

[cali]

14. clueless and pathetic

but I hope you keep it up. you do wonderful work against your candidate.

Do you really think anyone gives a flying fuck about this puerile shit?

[Proud2BAmurkin]

20. why did they photoshop them in front of Obama's colors and logo? Tasteless and not as subtle

as they thought

[Occam Bandage]

23. So it didn't look as visually jarring as Clinton's 5-minute hackjob. It's good web design.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

27. It sucks. "Edwards is with us." The Edwardses look fine without being photoshopped

[Occam Bandage]

29. That isn't "photoshopping." It's cropping. You're ignorant.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

32. What is it. They cut and pasted a cut out of J and E on to an Obama logo.

[Occam Bandage]

36. Cropping. Photoshopping refers to editing the picture, which was not done.

Also, the color blue is not an Obama logo.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

38. What do you call pasting a cut out photo onto a candidates logo then

[Occam Bandage]

42. Cropping and placing on a blue background. You know, good web design. Hillary

didn't even bother using the same font she used elsewhere.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

47. Hillary used an unembellished photo of J and E. Looks nice and honest.

[Occam Bandage]

50. In that "we obviously slapped this together in five minutes" way.

[calmblueocean]

52. Keep it up. I'm enjoying this! Who will win the shocking Battle of the Color Schemes!?

Who cares about policy, this is what matters!

[Proud2BAmurkin]

59. lol but it's symbolic of Obama, too slick by half

[calmblueocean]

64. Man, you need a hug. Pick your battles! This is silly.

(Although I prefer silly to hateful.)

Seriously, I don't know what you think you're accomplishing, but I'll watch you go just the same.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

68. lol

To me it's "symbolic" of a larger truth but admit it probably looks and maybe is trivial.

[Maribelle]

49. In order to crop a picture you have to edit it. You can do exactly that in Photoshop.

Say honest, now.

[Occam Bandage]

53. Cropping is removing information from a picture. Photoshopping is editing visible information.

Glad I could clear that up.

[Maribelle]

57. Photoshop is a brand name by Adobe. In Photoshop you can crop.

I am a computer expert.

[Occam Bandage]

62. Okay, let me give you a nice analogy.

"Xeroxing" something means to make photocopies of it. Xerox office stations can also staple documents. When you say something is stapled, you do not say it is "xeroxed."

Photoshop, as a verb, has a very specific meaning outside the brand name. It's a meaning, in fact, that Adobe is somewhat upset about; they frequently file complaints with media outlets for using "photoshop" other than to refer to their program.

[Maribelle]

67. Sorry, that's a poor analogy. Removing staples is not using software.

if you do not want to use Photo shop to crop a picture, that's fine. Use another brand. Use CorelDraw, which I use. (I told you I was an expert, remember)

you cannot crop a picture on a computer without using some brand of computer software

the term photoshopping has come to generically define the pallet of features and functions that are available within a software package, of which one is cropping

it's truly not up to you to try to define what photoshopping means or does not mean when it is cut and dried and means exactly what i said.

[hezekkia]

26. we get it already, you hate Barack and LOVE Hillary.

[cali]

44. my dear merkysmirk,

I didn't go to either site. I douldn't care less about this petty nonsense, and nor do other people who have a lick of sense.\

And I hate to sound like my rather snobby mother, but you exeplify tastelessness.

[jenmito]

16. She'll do and say anything to get elected. I don't believe she does/says anything out of sincerity.

[emilyg]

22. No pleasing you, eh?

[jenmito]

70. Not if it's Hillary.

[John Q. Citizen]

24. Obama is leading in delegates. That makes him the leader. Clinton leads in pandering.

She's already hovering over the still warm body of his campaign, hoping to suck it dry.

If she was such a big fan of Edwards, why didn't she say so before?

Why didn't she speak out about the media black-out?

She's in it to spin it, and she will say anthing to win.

Truely disgusting.

[Alexander]

33. .

[LittleClarkie]

45. I look forward to the day when you decide to post something substancial like your candidate's issues

Instead of pronouncements of gloom meant to demoralize if they weren't so damn transparent, or big deals made of small things that your average voter could give to figs about.

What will your candidate do for the average voter. You think you could talk about that for once?

[Proud2BAmurkin]

51. What my candidate will do

1. Get elected

2. repair the economy and the US relationships around the world, like they already did once, keep the US secure, reform health care

3. Bury the influence of the PUKE right and the MSM.

[Occam Bandage]

55. So, nothing after November, other than that you have hope that she'll change things.

[Proud2BAmurkin]

61. Right, hope and change plus belief she would win which is key to getting change.

[Occam Bandage]

63. So how does that differ from your mocking portrayal of Obama supporters?

[Proud2BAmurkin]

66. Because Obama has one year in the Senate before running and

The Clintons have been "working with" other side for 12 years as governor, 8 years in WH, 2 terms in the US Senate. They know how it's done and they know how to beat the MSM (did it three times)

Experience and electability, and the ability to communicate DETAILS of a policy to win over the public no matter what kind of MSM or GOP opposition we're facing with our agenda is what it comes down to for me.

I'm glad my candidate is under fair and UNFAIR attacks by the MSM because that's what they will do in the GE and it's better if it's old news by then, and better to see a candidate prove they can go past it to the voters.

The fact that they haven't hit Obama yet is :scared: because in my view they will finish him off a week after nomination.

They will find the usual bullshit but the opponent will also have "experience" to bludgeon him with. They will paint him as nothing else except being a good platitude speaker and he'll end up looking "weak." They made a war hero "weak"so you don't have to wonder what they will do to an inexperienced neophyte who never gets specific.

My "attacks" are nothing compared to what he's in for. Sludge, Tucker, Will Kristol and other PUKES are promoting the hell out of him. Part of it is Clinton hate but most of it is licking their chops over the possibility of an Obama nomination

[Occam Bandage]

69. But it isn't different, you're just giving a justification for why you think she'll win.

I can give justifications for my opinion that she's less likely than Obama. The basic "hope and change" mantra is still the same.

[LSK]

58. these type of bullshit worthless posts are why I do not come to GDP anymore

What a fucking petty waste of bandwidth.