Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If it weren't for Edwards, I'd be so out of this whole election cycle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sjdnb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 11:54 PM
Original message
If it weren't for Edwards, I'd be so out of this whole election cycle
The Obama/Clinton 'war' has, at this point, gone from ridiculous to absurd to vicious and, now, is just too plain ugly to look at.

I don't think I could bring myself to get within 10 miles of either of their campaigns.

When mudslinging, one should make sure the mud is not shaped like a boomerang. (from a Digg comment I saw, author unknown)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. I couldn't agree more. Edwards stayed above the ugliness between the Clinton and Obama camps
Edwards earned alot of respect from many people for that. He was the only looking like a president.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. You Are So Right!
the other 2 sicken me!
John is the only Grown up1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. I am there also. Clinton and Obama have turned me completely
off. I have not been enthused at any time by either of them, but their childish bickering is the last straw. I don't think I can bring myself to vote for either of them no matter what. I am hoping Edwards gets the nomination at this point, cause he is the only Democrat running for Pres. that will get my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Sooo childish!
I expect them to stick their tongues out at each other!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. I have to say, nothing that matters to me is being debated by Clinton and Obama. Glad Edwards is in
there talking about giving power back to the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. How is that done? He repeats lines over and over again
but what exactly does "giving power back to the people" mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. It means that political and economic power shifts away from people who donate $130,000 to pols and
goes to people who work for a living.

And it happens by fixing the tax code, labor laws, and all the laws that have tilted the playing field to the disadvantage of small business people, employees, students...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That's what I mean. .."fixing the tax code, labor laws, and all the laws that have tilted
the playing field to the disadvantage of small business people, employees, students..."

I hear that too, but fix them how? And how radically? He still has to go through Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Are you saying you'd rather vote for someone who doesn't want to do those things because Congress is
not going to pass them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. What things!!!! Geebuss, what is the plan to give power
back to the people and take it away from the corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
39. Let's take one example. In 2004, all the Dems proposed their college plans.
Every one of them, except Edwards, proposed a plan for more student loans.

Only Edwards proposed a plan that reduced the principal.

That shifts power from Wall St to people trying to get into and stay in the middle class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #13
40. A second example.
Edwards was the only candidate I heard in 2004 to propose a higher cap gains tax on higher levels of capital gains. (In 2008, I have no idea if O and C even care about this issue -- if they do, they're not foregrounding it).

Our tax code burdens people who work for a living, and it makes sure that people who buy and sell things do pretty well by taxing income from work twice as much as income from long term capital gains and dividends. Edwards's plan adds a little bit of progressivity to the tax code.

That would shift power away from Wall St and to people who work for a living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. The power you exude over the congress
from the Oval Office is enormous because it's so tough to override a veto. We have to assume because it's pretty likely that we will have an even larger majority in both houses.

Once "good" bills shown to be beneficial to the middle class languish because of republican obstruction, the public will start demanding action and the pressure will get huge for the republicans to come to the table.

Remember Bill Clinton was ready to let the republicans shut down the government instead of caving on the budget he wanted? And at the last minute they backed down. That's what Edwards would do.

Not only that, a president can go right directly to the people with "fireside chats" if he wants to. Reagan was a master at that.

You only have to right man who doesn't take a backward step to those repuke slugs and the train will start to move. Edwards is that man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. go directly to the people with what?? I still haven't
heard one piece of legislation that would do what Edwards claims to want to do. Take away corporate "personhood"? Make private health insurance companies illegal? Raise taxes on the rich and send checks to the poor? What??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I'll start with 3
1) He is going to repeal Bush's tax cuts and use 120 billion of that to give every American health coverage.

If you can't afford it as in you don't pay taxes now, you will get it free.
People making up to 100k will receive help paying for it.
No pre-existing conditions crap
Dental and Eyecare included
You can keep the ins you have now if you want to.

Its the best deal us 90%-ers will ever get.

2)Public financing of campaigns: We just aren't going to get that from Obama or Hillary because they are already addicted to corporate cash.

3) Ending BS trade deals like NAFTA: Hillary sure as hell loves her some free trade and outsourcing, and Obama is too green not to get swindled, if he doesn't sellout anyway for another few hundred million in campaign contributions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. I don't know enough about #1, but Public financing for campaigns will never pass
And end Nafta, there is still a majority in Congress that support it in principle and only talk about tweaking it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. understood, but here is the rub:

Obama and Hillary can go on all day about "experience", "hope", "change". Its all dogcrap if they are sitting on a mountain of corporate bribes. Who is more trustworthy if not the guy who isn't taking any?

John Edwards is making specific promises he will be held to. Hillary and Obama have the smoke machine going so later on we can't hold them to anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. While Lady clinton sings a song to the
Silicon Valley Computer entrepreneurs telling them how she will secure more HB 1 foreign worker visas.

SHe does that in one breath, and then in the very next,is saying that we need to address our children's declining interest in math and science.

Huh? HELLO:

If you see one or both parents shut out of the job market while the research facilities go to Singapore, and the H B 1 visa crowd designs the new hardware and software, why would any kid in their right mind want to study hard?

Study hard today so you can be unemployed tomorrow.

Compliments of the new Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. What does Hope and One America mean? Those are the Obama mantras!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. Excuse me, what exactly does change/hope mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. It seems the mud has slowed down a lot
there was a long time with it mostly being Hillary(unless you think Obama was subtly playing the race card), then Obama vs. Hillary in/around the debate, then the radio ads were pulled and it's been over. Except maybe for the media, and not as aggressive, legit(?) remarks by all camps, of course....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. I have to agree.
I'd be working on a local congressional race if it wasn't for Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I will be Gone If Edwards Goes!
To me it will signal the end of the Democratic party which I have held as an ideal from childhood and might just truly require to , like some drug addict, have to hit ROCK BOTTOM before it can get better.
To crash and burn before it can be a phoenix rising from the ashes!

I will not be a Democratic Party Enabler!
If the Party is hell-bent on destroying itself, far be it from me to stand in it's way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDittie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah, me too.
I'm barely hanging in there with the whole Democratic Party as it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Same here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. Sad but true!
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iris5426 Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Ditto...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. I so agree.. I actually jumped ships from Kucinich because he was
going after John.. John is similar in convictions... he may not have always done things the same, but he does care... that threw me off Kucinich.. too bitter and negative... that's when I really looked at the policies.. they are good, well thought out.. and if the two top keep stealing his ideas, then they must be something worth noting.. so, why not vote for the one who spurned them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. I'm with Edwards now, but I haven't forgotten that it was John who went after Dennis
--colluding with Clinton to eliminate him from the debates. And you expect Kucinich not to be mad at that? Not that I approve of how that clouded his strategic thinking though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
25. I feel the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stravu9 Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. I think this might it for me. I may have to opt out .
No Black voters for John?! None?
This Party is so messed up now.
I can't do this anymore.
I think on Monday I'll change my Party affiliation to Green.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjdnb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. I don't understand how anyone sees the divides and hostilities
that have developed among the camps of the two 'spotlighted' candidates, as a result of this primary season, as a good sign.

It is clear that some campaigns, party representatives, and the media have opportunistically driven wedges between groups of people (race, gender, sexual preference, religious affiliation, etc.) for political gain. And, with each primary, the divide grows.

So much mud has been slung already, it is hard to imagine it will be cleared away, anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
28. I'd be done with the Democratic party.
Republican vs Democrats has become free-trade fascists -vs- free-trade social moderates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. I understand your frustration.
The DLC Democrats are crap. But overall the Democrats are light years ahead of the Rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
30. R&K because I would by tuned out this primary season. [n\t]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeStateDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
31. The way the other two are acting it will be tough to win in November. Polarizing behaviors.
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 08:05 PM by FreeStateDemocrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
32. I share your feelings
And this may be the last one for me for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. It will be the last one for me! I am done after this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cybergata Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
35. I agree! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
37. Same here. I am just
sick that people think Obama is a Dem when he is nothing more than a repugnant-lite.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC