Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking (Novak)!?! - Attorney Gen Edwards?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:22 PM
Original message
Breaking (Novak)!?! - Attorney Gen Edwards?
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 04:23 PM by kpete
Breaking! Attorney Gen Edwards
by maxnyc
Fri Jan 25, 2008 at 01:15:17 PM PST

In an article published in Rasmussen Reports, our old friend Robert Novak
is reporting that the Obama campaign will offer John Edwards the position of Attorney General.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/...
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_commentary/commentary_by_robert_d_novak/attorney_general_edwards


WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Illinois Democrats close to Sen. Barack Obama are quietly passing the word that John Edwards will be named attorney general in an Obama administration.

Installation at the Justice Department of multimillionaire trial lawyer Edwards would please not only the union leaders supporting him for president but organized labor in general. The unions relish the prospect of an unequivocal labor partisan as the nation's top legal officer.

In public debates, Obama and Edwards often seem to bond together in alliance against front-running Sen. Hillary Clinton. While running a poor third, Edwards could collect a substantial bag of delegates under the Democratic Party's proportional representation. Edwards then could try to turn his delegates over to Obama in the still unlikely event of a deadlocked Democratic National Convention.

more at:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/25/16519/5981/298/443124
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bingo was his nameo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Attorney General? That doesn't even make sense. Is that supposed to win over Edwards people?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Hey, works for me
He could do a lot of good for the country in such a position, pushing back against corporate power (the essence of his campaign at the moment).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. But how would you know that Obama made the promise? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. cause Novak said so
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
55. Yep that cinches it. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
69. I don't -- I'm just saying if it were so, it'd work for me (as an Edwards fan)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monty__ Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
65. He could do more work
for the nation in the White House
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't be picking out the carpet and drapes just yet, Barack.
You still have a few gauntlets to pass before it comes to this.

Really!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. a few?
how about the 19 States out of the 22 voting on February 5th where he's still polling lower than Hillary -- out of the margin of error -- and has a lot of ground to make up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. I was trying to be nice.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #37
54. okay, then I'll give it to ya
he does have "a few" gauntlets -- the women vote, the white vote, the high school graduate vote, the hispanic vote, the latino vote, the cuban vote, the vote from our older citizens, the staunchly Democrat vote and (in Alabama, at least) the Undecided vote which he's currently trailing -- to overcome before that happens.

Piece of cake. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mathewsleep Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. what position would edwards
offer barack if elected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Obama already has a job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
39. And you're asking me because......?
How would I know? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mathewsleep Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. i wasn't seriusly asking.
i was rhetorical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. choosing his Administration
before even getting close to the Nomination? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
35. Edwards pledged to have Repubs. in HIS admin.
Is that ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. I don't paint with as broad a brush.
There are some decent Republicans out there just as there are -- according to DU, at least -- some pretty noxious Democrats. Having the best people for the toughest job is a prerequisite if you're going to have a successful Administration, regardless of their Party Affiliation.

I just found it hilarious that Barack is already choosing his Cabinet before he's even CLOSE to getting the Nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. I don't think that Obama is asking
Edwards to be Attorney General. Robert Novak is a shit stirrer and a trouble maker. If Edwards can get to be power broker he should ask for more. Maybe he might be the candidate then he can make up his own cabinet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. If true (I hope it is) there goes Hillary's national lead
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
23. Pretty presumptuous of Obama
Heads would explode here if Hillary did the same. Hypocrites - they names are Obama supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:24 PM
Original message
Apparently Novak gets his info from some very ironic sources
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Take any thing the republicans say with a grain of salt
They already have their hands in our candidates, and are laughing their ssa off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would LOVE to see this !!
USAG John Edwards!

He could do more to restore real democracy there than anywhere else in the government.

Easy Senate confirmation, too, as a former Senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tennessee Gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Quite presumptuous!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. That's how we'll win this election -- put out our TEAM
Bush got a lot of votes in 2000 because he'd been vocal about appointing Colin Powell as SOS. I don't think we can be TOO presumptuous in letting the country know who will be running things if we're in charge. Hillary's entitled to do the same (but something tells me her choices would look a lot like W's -- all retreads from the last family admin).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
57. Oh yes let Obama put
a lot more inexperienced people in place just like him. That is reassuring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #57
68. If you've seen who's advising him, that's hardly the case
He has people from Carter's administration, even from Bill C.'s, supporting him. Obama is smart enough to know that he DOESN'T know it all, and from what I've seen in his choice of advisers, the intelligence to surround himself with people who may have that knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. But Obama supporters hated the idea when it was floated that Hillary was going to give him AG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Doesn't Obama have to get the nomination first?
This smells to me like a Novak is taking orders from the Clinton camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Yeah - cuz Novak just loves Hillary
What a stupid post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
41. i was wondering how this would be blamed on Hillary
cute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think Obama presumes waaay too much..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:30 PM
Original message
He always has...
from the start, he's acted like it was all his...very arrogant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunonmars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. Theres a reason you dont give away information about the cabinet
before an election.

Its so your opponent does not batter you over head with it.

If he says he'll make Edwards AG, you can be sure every big business in this country will take Obama down quicker than lightening.

His big business backers would never allow it, you can be guaranteed on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Great, irritate the Edwards people some more...
This is only going to piss them off. This story is total GARBAGE. Novak is an asshole! The Obama campaign has been a bit too busy to waste time dreaming about a cabinet. I think Feb 5th and tomorrow are a bit more pressing. This is worthless delusional rambling right now..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. But Bob, didn't Clinton offer Edwards the AG spot when they met for 20 mins. after the last debate?
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 04:30 PM by flpoljunkie
Bob Novak wouldn't make sh*t up, would he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm wondering why anybody listens to Novak anymore.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 04:30 PM by AtomicKitten
But, if true, I think that would be great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oviedodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. Stop killing Obama on this, it is normal for candidates to start
conceptualizing their cabinet and appointees. They all are doing it and you will hear more reports from others, ala Leiberman being involved with a McCain ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
21. Did Obama win already?
This is what I hate about him. His arrogance is breathtaking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. JE would be an ace Atty General. I like.
Harkens back to --->
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. AG? That means Edwards is done in a few years. VP is the only worthwhile post
If he is VP he can run for president again and would have a good chance of winning in 2016. If he is AG he would serve for a couple of years and then be done politically. What backhanded offer from Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
53. RFK was JFK's AG. n/t (is it too late to buy a vowel here?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #53
77. RFK had not run for president twice before becoming AG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
27. Well, if Novak says it it must be-
Hey, wait a minute. Did you say Novak? Robert Novak? Never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. While I'd prefer to see JRE as president,
if he doesn't win the nomination, I would love to see him as AG. He'd kick some serious ass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
29. THIS makes the Greatest Page?
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

The "Greatest Page" is anything BUT, (these days at least).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:31 PM
Original message
No matter what - he would be an interesting AG
I certainly would trust him a whole lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. That would make one HELL of a consolation prize. IMO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogmarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
31. Novak is blowing smoke out his ass. nt
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 04:32 PM by frogmarch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
32. Could they do this w/o Edwards' approval? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. damn talk about putting the cart before the horse
Its not over yet Mr. Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edgewater_Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. That May Mean Obama/Richardson or Obama/Napolitano
And a deal to get Edwards' delegates, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
40. Seems like a poor attempt to deflate the Edwards campaign. Fuck Novakula with a Silver crucifix (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #40
59. That's what it sounds like to me, too, FreepFryer.
I live in DC, and rumors are rampant here 24/7.

Some more DC rumors: Bloomberg will announce his candidacy before March 31st;
Republican staffers are being warned NOT to put their condos and houses
on the market before November (it could cause a worse real estate collapse
and backfire against Republicans on election day); Rudy has pissed off his
money base, who started giving him cash 2 years ago, by spending it all like a
drunken sailor, and the Rudy well is now dry; Mary Matalin is called The Kiss Of Death
Lady because every campaign she signs onto has failed... and her consultin biz
is suffering, too; and the list goes on.

This is a rumor mill town, and Novakula knows it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #59
66. Excellent insight. Of course these GOP criminals are too greedy to forestall the 'crunch' on Nov 5.
They'll each list their condos thinking that they are 'under the radar' and their greed will cause their (and their GOP massas) undoing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #40
63. More importanttly, to help Obama's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #63
80. I don't think helping any Democrat is a concept Novak can understand. He's pure negativity. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
42. Robert Novak???
This Robert Novak???



Yeah, his credibility level is lower than the sea level of the Dead Sea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. I totally agree. Why doesn't Edwards pass the word he "might' name Obama AG?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. I don't think Edwards would waste time with such a juvenile move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
75. Guess you needed the sarcasm thingy to know what I meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. Oops! It gets a little confusing around here sometimes!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
43. I'd be down with that
It would be easier to get him confirmed as that, then Supreme Court justice, which is where I'd like to see him ultimately end up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
44. John Edwards would make an excellent Attorney General
But, at this moment in time, I happen to believe he would make a better President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clinton Crusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
46. Holy crap! How long was my nap? I missed the inauguration????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
49. Boy they REALLY want John to quit, huh?
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 04:44 PM by redqueen
Don't listen, John!

GO, Johnny, GO!

"our old friend Robert Novak"

:rofl:

Yeah, he only has all our best interests at heart! :rofl:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. It's a testament to the power he holds in this election.
And Obama's own personal regard for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
50. Edwards would make a superlative Attorney General
Just my humble opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #50
64. agree
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #50
83. I don't buy Novak has any inside info still
I'd love to see Edwards as AG! I said that in some thread on DU recently. Imagine Edwards being able to go after corporations as AG. And after crooked Repubs and their lobbyist friends. Also the Halliburtons, Blackwaters, etc. Hell I'd sic him on Bush and Cheney. Can still prosecute them after they are out of office.

And I'm not getting into to the Obama/Clinton feud here now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
58. AG as a stepping stone to
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 05:11 PM by southern_dem
the Supreme Court? However, I'd prefer that Edwards be the one making a cabinet. :)

edit: Oh and Novak has jumped the shark. Even the Republicans don't take him seriously anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. Hi there southern_dem...
did I already say welcome to DU?

Cause if not... welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
60. Edwards would make a fantastic AG, though I thought Clinton would be offering the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
62. Novak is trying to get Edwards voters in SC to vote for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #62
78. Let's hope they remember Novakula's history.
This guy is scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loveangelc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
67. wow.
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 05:44 PM by loveangelc
well, like i've been saying....edwards is going to give his delegates to obama if this goes to the convention. thats why he's staying in until the convention imo. i think his internals show that edwards people will go more to clinton than to obama, which also may be a factor in his staying in until the convention. even though theyre going at eachother during the debates, i think theyre doing that because edwards has to look like he's competing against them both. they can't seem too obvious. good job, edwards. good job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
70. Is this why when Edwards was asked who would be in his ...
cabinet he said he would not tell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
71. Robert Novak said it so I'm supposed to believe it? Tell me another.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
72. Always Obama rumors before each primary
Remember in Iowa that the rumors were that Dodd, Biden, et al were supposedly telling their supporters to pick Obama as second choice. They denied it, but by then people were already on way to caucus.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
73. BREAKING11!!!!1!!1 Robert Novak to be SG in my administration.
If elected president, I promise to appoint Robert Novak to be the Shithead General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
74. If true, would this impact John's plan to stay in till the convention?
I like it, but only as a default position once John is unequivocally out of the race mathematically.

I don't want John to do anything which could lessen the number of delegates he could bring to the convention.

But should Obama prevail (a far better end game than Clinton) - Edwards as AG would rock, that is, assuming he does not want the VP slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
79. Novak of the Plame fame is Edwards confident now? Attempt to stir voters to Obama
from Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. More accurately "Attempt to sic Democrats on Democrats" and "Attempt to weaken populist Democrat"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
82. Isn't it presumptuous to select a cabinet before one even gets the nomination?
Not cool for him to do this. For all Obama knows, it could indeed be Edwards making those cabinet selections in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC