Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who is the (corporate owned) media endorsing?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:27 PM
Original message
Who is the (corporate owned) media endorsing?
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 09:28 PM by jackson_dem
Whether coverage of the candidates was positive or negative.

Obama: 47% positive, 16% negative.
Clinton: 27% positive, 38% negative.
McCain: 12% positive, 48% negative
Giuliani: 28% positive, 37% negative
JDNE

Net numbers

Obama +31
Giuliani -9
Clinton -11
McCain -36

http://www.journalism.org/node/8187

These are from the first five months of the campaign. If anyone has a newer study post it. There is little reason to believe the tenor of reporting changed from that point until Iowa. Since then as the sniping has escalating the positive numbers for each candidate must have dropped, with the brief exception of the media orgasm for Obama after Iowa and McCain's favorable coverage since New Hampshire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. they must have some really bad shit on Obama... simmering till after the nomination...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. That's what I am afraid of too. MSM has given him the kid glove treatment.
That makes me extremely suspicious that something is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yet listen to the squealing
of his supporters.

Funny, they can't handle ANY heat; what about their candidate? Seems he is folding and angry already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why don't you ask Murdoch who he is endorsing.
There is your answer.

Those McCain numbers are total horseshit, in my professional analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Judging by what his network does apparently Obama
So Murdoch agrees with the rest of the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Judging by who he gives money to apparently Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. So are the Hillary numbers.
Unless it's "negative" to promote her as the "inevitable nominee" since 2 minutes after Chimpy took the second invalid oath of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Hillary has been attacked a zillion times
Why didn't we hear about Rezko until a year after Obama's campaign began? It took Hillary mentioning Rezko for the media to pick it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I think Hillary
Ruined the "surprise" they were holding on to till after the nomination!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. For the first five months, the McCain numbers sound about right
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 09:37 PM by jpgray
He got his major media-darling mojo back only recently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. It looks like Obama to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. I've got a bad, bad feeling about all this, and so, apparently, does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zueda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. You do realize that there could be a valid explanation don't ya?
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 10:30 PM by Zueda
on edit: Here is just one reason why.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVuMYKs8iJs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC