Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Absolutely Can't Stand Bush!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:02 AM
Original message
I Absolutely Can't Stand Bush!
Edited on Wed Jan-23-08 06:02 AM by Kablooie
It's easy for me to stand Hillary, Obama, or Edwards.
Any of them.

Who's with me on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. You obviously suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome.
You hate Bush so much it's driven you around the bend, you poor soul.

Gosh, I can't imagine what could have caused THAT to happen. :sarcasm:

Yeah, I'm with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hillary and Edwards, YES!
obama, NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm with you all the way.
Even a lump on a log would be better than bush. The Rs want to give us bush 2.0 with their front runners spouting things like "the Iraq war is going great", "Torture is an American value" and "The government's only function is to funnel money to the uber wealthy".

Yet the Dem candidates are all articulate, intelligent and passionate. Our party has been blessed with three very capable candidates. I think the Rs have been cursed with warmed over bushes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary? You can't stand bu$h, but Hillary is ok?
Hillary is a DINO! A place holder till 2012. We need someone to stop bu$h's war and she on record for not doing that. We need the insurance companies out of the health care decisions making business, Her plan will do nothing of the sort. And that is just 2 of the many reasons not to support her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bodhi Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Fascism
I love the discussions here on DU about which Democratic candidate can win the '08 election when there's a good chance there won't BE an election ....oh look jim, see that plane flying into that building over there ... BAM ... before you can say “L’État, c’est moi” Bush will be president for LIFE!
Get use to having Bush around - he ain't going nowhere ...

here's why:

The United States Military Commissions Act of 2006, (Senate Bill 3930<1>) approved by Congress and signed into law by Bush last October, specifically says that the president can federalize the National Guard to "suppress public disorder" in the event of "national disorder, epidemic, other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, or incident." That determination, the act states, is solely the president's to make. Congress is not involved. The Military Commissions Act creates the category of "unlawful enemy combatants," who lack the right of habeas corpus, and traditional protections from torture under the Geneva Conventions. Furthermore, the Act avoids any clear language ensuring that U.S. citizens will not be classified as a "terrorist". The New York Times stated that the legislation introduced, "A dangerously broad definition of "illegal enemy combatant" in the bill that could subject legal residents of the United States, as well as foreign citizens living in their own countries, to summary arrest and indefinite detention with no hope of appeal. The president could give the power to apply this label to anyone he wanted."

The John Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR) signed on the same day, allows the President to “...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to... 1. restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when... the President determines that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; 2. suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy...Keep in mind the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385) helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those prohibitions

The National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD 51), and the Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD-20), signed on May 9, 2007, gives special powers to the President in the event of a "Catastrophic Emergency," which means "any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions." In such situations, "The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government." The scope of the program is so secretive that even Homeland Security Committee member and Congressman Peter DeFazio was denied access to view the classified portion of the documents.

A presidential Executive Order issued on July 17th, entitled Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq provides the President with the authority to confiscate the assets of "certain persons" who oppose the US led war in Iraq. It states that any American citizen who "threatens the peace and stability of Iraq and undermines efforts to promote reconstruction and reform" there may have all their property and interests seized by the Treasury department without warning. The executive order violates the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments of the US Constitution. It repeals one of the fundamental tenets of US democracy, which is the right to free expression and dissent.

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed HR 1955 titled the Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007. This bill is one of the most blatant attacks against the Constitution yet and actually defines "thought crimes" as homegrown terrorism. Unlike previous anti-terror legislation, this bill specifically targets the civilian population of the United States and uses vague language to define homegrown terrorism. Amazingly, 404 of our elected representatives from both the Democrat and Republican parties voted in favor of this bill.
http://psychedelictourist.blogspot.com/2007/07/were-just-one-planted-bomb-away-from.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beezlebum Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "he" ain't going nowhere
well, "he" as in "they," as in the ceo's of this corporation we call murica.

why make one dood a permanent dictator when they could continue with the charade demockrazy? it seems successful enough...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. I am! And how come this thread doesn't have more posts?
Come on, let's count the ways we hate him!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-23-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. what is the point of hating a lame duck?
He's history. We don't need to run against him anymore. Now his policies, which are the reasons behind the hate, those we apparently have to run against. Also Giuliani, he scares me since he clearly wants to be fuehrer, rather than President. Mr. slick-rich smiling Romney just disgusts me viscerally even if I thought he gave a crap about working class America, which he clearly does not. Which makes him even more revolting. Huckabee seems like a nice guy and he's running as a populist, but unfortunately is pushing the same UnFairTax nonsense as Gravel.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/hfojvt/55

So, it would be nice to see McCain get the nod, if only because Limbaugh is against him and that might help to fracture the Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC