Edwards knows he's the LOGICAL second contender in 2 way race so he's going for it.

Proud2BAmurkin

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-21-08 08:53 PM
Original message

Edwards knows he's the LOGICAL second contender in 2 way race so he's going for it.

Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 08:53 PM by Proud2BAmurkin

good for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ursi

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-21-08 08:56 PM
Response to Original message

1. he's doing great and getting issues that would be ignored if he wasn't up there

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

OneGrassRoot

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-21-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message

2. The Clinton-Obama battle is intense...

and in this day and age - right or wrong - any campaign can implode for reasons no one could anticipate at this moment.

John IS RELEVANT. Like it or not. Tonight shows it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

haroldgiowa

(218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-21-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message

3. Edwards is strong in a two person race.

If either Clinton or Obama were to drop out, highly doubtful, then Edwards picks up the roll as an alternative candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

all.of.me

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-21-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message

4. I just noticed...

So far, in every debate, Edwards has been off to the side. Hillary was in the middle last time, this time it is Obama. This is a psychological play. I don't like it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

VolcanoJen

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-21-08 09:02 PM
Response to Original message

5. Looks like Edwards has made some kind of choice here.

He's also showing off his mad skillz and earning some style points. But honestly, it would be nice if he wouldn't interrupt the other two candidates every turn.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

haroldgiowa

(218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-21-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5

6. It is the only way he gets a turn.

If time was equal at the end of the debate then I would agree that interuption is a bad thing. If the media would give him his fair time the race as we see it now may or may not have a different appearance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

midlife_mo_Jo

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-21-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #5

7. Interrupt them every turn?

If you were listening by radio and walked off every now and then, you might not even know he's in the debate!

He has to FIGHT for his chance to speak - FOR US!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

stravu9

(945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Mon Jan-21-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message

8. FIGHT JOHN FIGHT!!

YEAH!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:29 AM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.