Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama-Clinton Or Clinton-Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:17 PM
Original message
Obama-Clinton Or Clinton-Obama
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 05:18 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
I think those are the only tickets that can unite the entire party... Whoever wins should at least offer the vice presidency to the other...

It might be too much change and risky but it's not as risky as going in to the election with a fractured party...

" A house divided can not stand."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll go for Edwards-Obama (or Obama-Edwards)
just my take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Respectfully, He's Not Going To Be Close To The Other Two In Delegate Count*


*Unless he somehow miraclously changes the dynamic of this race...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I don't think he has to to become a vp....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 05:24 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
But then that defeats the purpose of a unity ticket...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fair Election In Nevada
How about we start there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. It won't happen. Obama won't agree to be VP, and neither will she.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Then Neither Side Can Complain
Problem solved...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where is the change in either of those scenarios?
Please highlight how Iraq/Iran and government for the people instead of for the corp. will change in any way? Oh well I am glad that you are happy. Someone should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Sure. I'll just address Obama
Obama has been a long time advocate for gov't reform. He's written and sponsored legislation limiting lobbyist influence. He has specific policies for both gov't and corporate transparency. He plans to get troops out of Iraq within 16 months. He has taken no lobbyist money in this campaign. He was the first major candidate to say he'd talk with high level Iranians. What else would you like to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:44 PM
Original message
His position on Iraq seems to change from debate to debate.
At one point Hillary, Obama and Edwards came out with the exact same stance. Thank you for your information. Peace, Kim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. That is an impossible ticket now
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 05:21 PM by antiimperialist
an Obama-Clinton ticket would lead reporters to ask the question, "Mrs. Clinton. Didn't your husband say that Obama's candidacy is a fairy tale"? How did that change now that you are trying to become the Vice-president?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Bill Clinton Said Obama's Anti-War Stance Was A "Fairy Tale" Not His Candidacy
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. It remains an unfair criticism of Senator Obama.
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 05:34 PM by Big Blue Marble
Bill's statement was misleading and insulting. And was meant to blunt
the difference between Hillary's Iraq vote and Obama's position on Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. That Can Be Debated
But it's unfair to say Bill Clinton dissed the very notion of his candidacy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. No that remains the subtle undertone of Bill's fairy tale remark.
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 05:55 PM by Big Blue Marble
Bill and Hillary were both out to prove that Obama was unfit to be president.
She tearing up at the thought that an Obama presidency would take us backward.
And Bill calling Obama, a sitting senator, Constitutional scholar, and proven legislative
activist, a kid.

They were both dissing Obama's campaign every chance they had, including the fairy tale insult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Hillary's Iraq vote and Obama's not there to vote
Let's get all the facts... Obama was in Illinois at the time of the Iraq vote... and what was he doing in Illinois?

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html

"It’s Not Just ‘Ayes’ and ‘Nays’: Obama’s Votes in Illinois Echo

In 1999, Barack Obama was faced with a difficult vote in the Illinois legislature — to support a bill that would let some juveniles be tried as adults, a position that risked drawing fire from African-Americans, or to oppose it, possibly undermining his image as a tough-on-crime moderate.

In the end, Mr. Obama chose neither to vote for nor against the bill. He voted “present,” effectively sidestepping the issue, an option he invoked nearly 130 times as a state senator."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Obama's Not Perfect... Neither Is Hill
We are trying to elect a pres not annoint a Pope...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Your point is well taken...
but then Popes are not perfect either.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cd3dem Donating Member (927 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. there is only one person who we know of that never makes a mistake...
W ........................not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Antiimp, you know that's not what was said - why board the Swiftboat?
Haven't we learned *anything* since Bush swiftboated Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. My bad
...but with the Iraq war being so important it would hurt the candidacy in that particular issue, and that's not good for the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Hardly impossible. See "voodoo economics". nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. And Bush Pere Had To Abandon His Pro Choice Stand Too
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Won't happen, IMO, but I appreciate your concern
and I'm NOT being sarcastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Lets extend this out some and you can presume but I know HRC
will be the nominee....Now all this going on about the clintons being mean to obama and all this foolhearted attempt to paint them both as racists will have passed and HRC will have received a good majority of the black vote and this will be good as she goes into the general election against the republican.....Now follow along here....Hrc does not need obama to carry all the blue states that Gore and Kerry did in 00, and 04, nor will she need obama to carry Illinois....and she might need a good vp choice to carry, oh say Tennessee. Now if HRC were to chose Harold Ford Jr. then Iwould say HRC will carry Tenn. and you can forego Florida as we all know if gore had won tenn. in 00 he would be president irregardless of the florida recount. hell, there would have been no reason for a recount.
So, I do not say HRC will choose Harold Ford Jr. but just a thought....HRC can pick up a few states and win the presidency and those would be West Virgina and New Mexico and there my friends is the election.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. The Race Stuff Sickens Me: From All Sides-The Racism And The Racialism
African Americans have been a loyal constituency... Their feelings need to be taken into account for reasons of prudence and respect...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. I concur with your statement and I am sure both Clintons will
meet with whomever needs be and resolve this misunderstanding and to me that is exactly what it was, but you got to keep the hotheads like Jesse Jackson Jr to hold his misguided fire and bombard faux news for splicing the tape on Bill Clintons speech wherein he says "fairy tale" and if one views and hears the speech one will know it was addressed to the media......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Agreed. It will happen.
One way or another.

Bookmark this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. You Agree With Me
It has to be at least offered or the party will be split...

Hillary needs all the African American voters she can get and Obama needs all the working class white, high school educated voters , older women,and Hispanics he can get...

It is risky though but the MSM would think twice before attacking a black man or a white woman...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. DSB...
My heart and soul are with Obama but my head tells me it will be a hard uphill slog and to not get my hopes up. So I prepare for the worst and hope for the best.

Bottom line: I will not be suprised if the ticket is Clinton-Obama 2008. In my view, there's no way in hell she can deny him the second slot if he wants it. To put it bluntly, "that shit won't fly." Given the qualities he would bring to the ticket - in terms of personal attributes and skills as well as a fine-tuned political operation and millions of supporters - it would also be the smart choice.

So...embrace history. As someone said, "Shake hands with tomorrow. It's here."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
16. Stop the hemorrhaging now by raising the discourse and eliminating the rancor.
Edited on Sat Jan-12-08 05:31 PM by Big Blue Marble
Sadly, I know that is not likely or easy, but it is the only way that the party reunites around the eventual nominee. Let each candidate and all their surrogates focus on what they offer us. Stop all negative attacks. I understand that especially for the Clintons, this would be very hard. They have spent so much of their political lives under intense
fire. And they have survived brilliantly by fighting back even harder. This is the only way they know to how win. The problem is the fight they took to the Republicans, the only fight they know, is not the fight they can take to this race with Obama. The party will implode. It has already begun. The only way is to pull back from the abyss and go positive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. No thank you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kucinich4America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. Neither.
No ticket with Hillary on it is acceptable. And the more I hear about Obama and who is endorsing him, the less I like him.

How about Edwards-Kucinich? Or Kucinich-Edwards?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. Obama-Clinton would be a bad ticket
Clinton would be a drag on Barack's message, and it's hard to imagine her taking the job anyway.

Clinton-Obama would be a great unity ticket, and a great preparation for Barack 2016, but I fear their individual electoral handicaps might be additive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. If They Lost He Still Gets His Chance In 2012 Or 2016
The Democratic establishment to the extent that it could would clear the field for him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
33. JEDNE.....N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tokenlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
35. Foreign policy will rule VP?
I think foreign policy will be the criteria for Clinton or Obama. Watch it be Richardson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy_Dem_Defender Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-12-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
36. not in a
million years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
38. Clinton will divide the party if she's on the ticket.
Edited on Mon Jan-14-08 02:49 PM by Radical Activist
She is a divisive figure with the general public and within the party. There are much better choices for an Obama running mate. Its time to make a clean break from the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
39. No, there will be enough time for the nominee to get the party in line without this
Campaigns are longer and they have a long period to appeal to their base before the convention. That really takes out the necessity of picking a VP to unite the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
40. Jesus-Lucifer or Lucifer-Jesus
Although I am certain that Hillary were to lose the nomination, Bill Clinton will be pushing to put her on the VP spot.

There are better women than Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
41. Edwards !
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
42. The next president will be a Republican
The ignorance and stupidity of the last few weeks has me convinced that the Democratic Party is over. We were once a great coalition party. Now we are a sniping pack of special interests. We don't deserve to govern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stop Cornyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
43. Triangulator-Centrist '08 or Centrist-Triangulator '08? Neither, thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC